Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adjustable Autonomy and Human-Agent Teamwork in Practice: An Interim Report on Space Applications

  • Chapter
Agent Autonomy

Abstract

We give a preliminary perspective on the basic principles and pitfalls of adjustable autonomy and human-centered teamwork. We then summarize the interim results of our study on the problem of work practice modeling and human-agent collaboration in space applications, the development of a broad model of human-agent teamwork grounded in practice, and the integration of the Brahms, KAoS, and NOMADS agent frameworks We hope our work will benefit those who plan and participate in work activities in a wide variety of space applications, as well as those who are interested in design and execution tools for teams of robots that can function as effective assistants to humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Acquisti, A., Sierhuis, M., Clancey, W. J., & Bradshaw, J. M. (2002). Agent-based modeling of collaboration and work practices onboard the International Space Station. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior Representation. Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agnew, N. M, & Brown, J. L. (1989). Foundations for a theory of knowing: II. Fallible but functional knowledge. Canadian Psychology, 30, 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allsopp, D., Beautement, P., Bradshaw, J. M., Durfee, E., Kirton, M., Knoblock, C, Suri, N., Tate, A., & Thompson, C. (2002). Coalition Agents eXperiement (CoAX): Multi-agent cooperation in an international coalition setting. A. Tate, J. Bradshaw, and M. Pechoucek (Eds.), Special issue of IEEE Intelligent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almond, R. G., Bradshaw, J. M., & Madigan, D. (1994). Reuse and sharing of graphical belief network components. In P. Cheeseman & R. W. Oldford (Ed.), Selecting Models from Data: AI and Statistics IV. (pp. 113–122). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrose, R., Gilbert, C, & Rehnmark, F. (2001). An experimental investigation of dexterous robots using Eva tools and interfaces. A1AA, 4593.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barber, K. S., Gamba, M., & Martin, C. E. (2002). Representing and analyzing adaptive decision-making frameworks. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 23–42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barber, K. S., & Martin, C. E. (1999). Agent autonomy: Specification, measurement, and dynamic adjustment. Proceedings of the Workshop on Autonomy Control Software, International Conference on Autonomous Agents. Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billings, C. E. (1997). Issues concerning human-centered intelligence systems: What’s ‘human-centered’ and what’s the problem? National Science Foundation Workshop on Human-Centered Systems: Information, Interactivity, and Intelligence. Arlington, VA, http://www.ifp/uiuc.edu.

  9. Boella, G. (2002). Obligations and cooperation: Two sides of social rationality. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 57–78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boy, G. (1998). Cognitive Function Analysis. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boy, G. (2002). Human-centered design of artificial agents: A cognitive function analysis approach. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Handbook of Software Agents, (pp. in press). Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bradshaw, J. M., Beautement, P., Kulkarni, S., Suri, N., & Raj, A. (2002). Toward a deliberative and reactive agent architecture for augmented cognition. DARPA Augmented Cognition Program White Paper., Pensacola, FL: Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, University of West Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bradshaw, J. M., Boy, G., Durfee, E., Gruninger, M., Hexmoor, H., Suri, N., Tambe, M., Uschold, M., & Vitek, J. (Ed.). (2002). Software Agents for the Warfighter. ITAC Consortium Report. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bradshaw, J. M., Chapman, C. R., Sullivan, K. M., Almond, R. G., Madigan, D., Zarley, D., Gavrin, J., Nims, J., & Bush, N. (1993). KS-3000: An application of DDUCKS to bone-marrow transplant patient support. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Florida AI Research Symposium (FLAIRS ′93), (pp. 89–95). Ft. Lauderdale, FL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bradshaw, J. M., Covington, S. P., Russo, P. J., & Boose, J. H. (1990). Knowledge acquisition for intelligent decision systems: integrating Aquinas and Axotl in DDUCKS. In M. Henrion, R. Shachter, L. N. Kanal, & J. Lemmer (Ed.), Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 255–270). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bradshaw, J. M., Dutfield, S., Benoit, P., & Woolley, J. D. (1997). KAoS: Toward an industrial-strength generic agent architecture. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software Agents. (pp. 375–418). Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bradshaw, J. M., Ford, K. M., Adams-Webber, J. R., & Boose, J. H. (1993). Beyond the repertory grid: New approaches to constructivist knowledge acquisition tool development. In K. M. Ford & J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Knowledge Acquisition as Modeling, (pp. 287–333). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bradshaw, J. M., Greaves, M., Holmback, H., Jansen, W., Karygiannis, T., Silverman, B., Suri, N., & Wong, A. (1999). Agents for the masses: Is it possible to make development of sophisticated agents simple enough to be practical? IEEE Intelligent Systems(March- April), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bradshaw, J. M., Suri, N., Canas, A., Davis, R., Ford, K. M., Hoffman, R., Jeffers, R., & Reichherzer, T. (2001). Terraforming cyberspace. IEEE Computer(July), 49–56. An expanded and updated version of this article is available in D. Marinescu and C. Lee (Eds.), Process Coordination and Ubiquitous Computing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2002, 165-185.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brainov, S., & Hexmoor, H. (2002). Quantifying autonomy. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 43–56). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burrough, B. (1998). Dragonfly: NASA and the Crisis Aboard Mir. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burstein, M. H., & McDermott, D. V. (1996). Issues in the development of human-computer mixed-initiative planning. In B. Gorayska & J. L. Mey (Ed.), Cognitive Technology: In Search of a Humane Interface. Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chernoff, H. (1973). The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(June), 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Christofferson, K., & Woods, D. D. (2002). How to make automated systems team players. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge, England:ElsevierCambridget University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clancey, W. J. (2002). Simulating activities: Relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination. Cognitive Systems Review, special issue on Situated and Embodied Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, P. R., & Levesque, H. J. (1991). Teamwork. Technote 504. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, March.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen, P. R., Levesque, H. R., & Smith, I. (1997). On team formation. In J. Hintikka & R. Tuomela (Ed.), Contemporary Action Theory. Synthese.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen, R., Allaby, C, Cumbaa, C, Fitzgerald, M., Ho, K., Hui, B., Latulipe, C, Lu, F., Moussa, N., Pooley, D., Qian, A., & Siddiqi, S. (1998). What is initiative? User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8(3-4), 171–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen, R., & Fleming, M. (2002). Adjusting the autonomy in mixed-initiative systems by reasoning about interaction. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cypher, A. (Ed.). (1993). Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Damianou, N., Dulay, N., Lupu, E. C, & Sloman, M. S. (2000). Ponder: A Language for Specifying Security and Management Policies for Distributed Systems, Version 2.3. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Computing, 20 October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dorais, G., Bonasso, R. P., Kortenkamp, D., Pell, B., & Schrekenghost, D. (1999). Adjustable autonomy for human-centered autonomous systems on Mars. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agents with Adjustable Autonomy. AAA1 Technical Report SS-99-06. Menlo Park, CA, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  34. Erickson, T. (1997). Designing agents as if people mattered. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software Agents, (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, MA: The AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Falcone, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (2002). From automaticity to autonomy: The frontier of artificial agents. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy. (pp. 79–103). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Feltovich, P., Spiro, R. R., & Coulson, R.L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. Hoffman (Ed.), Expertise in Context: Human and Machine, (pp. 125–146). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferguson, G., Allen, J., & Miller, B. (1996). TRAINS-95: Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-96), (pp. 70–77). Edinburgh, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fitts, P. M. (Ed.). (1951). Human Engineering for an Effective Air Navigation and Traffic Control System. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ford, K. M., Bradshaw, J. M., Adams-Webber, J. R., & Agnew, N. M. (1993). Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity. In K. M. Ford & J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Knowledge Acquisition as Modeling, (pp. 9–32). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ford, K. M., Glymour, C, & Hayes, P. (1997). Cognitive prostheses. AI Magazine, 18(3), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ford, K. M., & Hayes, P. (1998). On computational wings: Rethinking the goals of Artificial Intelligence. Scientific American. Special issue on “Exploring Intelligence”, 9(4), 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gawdiak, Y., Bradshaw, J. M., Williams, B., & Thomas, H. (2000). R2D2 in a Softball: The Personal Satellite Assistant. H. Lieberman (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2000), (pp. 125–128). New Orleans, LA, New York: ACM Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Gelernter, D. (1992). Mirror Worlds. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gershenfeld, N. A. (1999). When Things Start to Think. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H., & Chandrasekaran, B. (Ed.). (1995). Diagrammatic Reasoning: Computational and Cognitive Perspectives. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Goodrich, M. A., Olsen Jr., D. R., Crandall, J. W., & Palmer, T. J. (2001). Experiments in adjustable autonomy. Proceedings of the IJCAI_01 Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: Interacting with Autonomous Agents. Seattle, WA, Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  47. Grosz, B.J. (1996). Collaborative systems. AI Magazine, 17(2), 67–85.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Hamilton, S. (2001). Thinking outside the box at IHMC. IEEE Computer, 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hancock, P. A., & Scallen, S. F. (1998). Allocating functions in human-machine systems. In R. Hoffman, M. F. Sherrick, & J. S. Warm (Ed.), Viewing Psychology as a Whole, (pp. 509–540). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffman, R. (1997). How to doom yourself to repeat the past: Some reflections on the history of cognitive technology. Cognitive Technology, 2(2), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hoffman, R., Feltovich, P., Ford, K. M., Woods, D. D., Klein, G., & Feltovich, A. (2002). A rose by any other name... would probably be given an acronym. IEEE Intelligent Systems,, July-August, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Holtzman, S. H. (1989). Intelligent Decision Systems. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCH1 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ′99). Pittsburgh, PA, New York: ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  54. Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., & Hovel, D. (1999). Attention-sensitive alerting. Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence (UAI ′99), (pp. 305–313). Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  55. Howard, R. A., & Matheson, J. E. (1984). Influence diagrams. In R. A. Howard & J. E. Matheson (Ed.), Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. (pp. 719–762). Menlo Park, California: Strategic Decisions Group.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kahle, B. (1993). Interview of Brewster Kahle. Intertek, 4,15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions in Electronics. New York: Institute of Radio Engineers., 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lieberman, H. (Ed.). (2001). Your Wish is My Command: Programming By Example. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lieberman, H., & Selker, T. (2002). Agents for the user interface. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Handbook of Software Agents. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Luck, M., D’Inverno, M., & Munroe, S. (2002). Autonomy: Variable and generative. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 9–22). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lupu, E. C, & Sloman, M.S. (1999). Conflicts in policy-based distributed systems management. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering-Special Issue on Inconsistency Management.

    Google Scholar 

  63. McDermott, D. (1976). Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity. SIGART Newsletter(57), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Milewski, A. E., & Lewis, S. H. (1994). Design of intelligent agent user interfaces: Delegation issues. AT&T Corporate Information Technologies Services Advanced Technology Planning, October 20.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Muscettola, N., Dorais, G., Fry, C, Levinson, R., & Plaunt, C. (2002). IDEA: Planning at the core of autonomous reactive agents. Proceedings of the Workshop on Online Planning and Scheduling, Sixth International Conference on AI Planning and Scheduling. Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  66. Myers, K., & Morley, D. (2002). Directing agents. In H. Hexmoor, C. Castelfranchi, & R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 143–162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  67. National_Aeronautics_and_Space_Administration (1999). International Space Station Operations and Planned Training Manual. ISS OPS and PL TM 21109, TD 9711, Rev. A. Houston, TX: Johnson Space Center.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Norman, D.A. (1992). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Norman, D. A. (1997). How might people interact with agents? In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software Agents, (pp. 49–55). Cambridge, MA: The AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Peacock, B., Rajulu, S., & Novak, J. (2001). Human factors and the International Space Station. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rich, G, Sidner, C, & Lesh, N. (2001). COLLAGEN: Applying collaborative discourse theory. Al Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Rich, C, & Waters, R. C. (1988). Automatic programming: Myths and prospects. IEEE Computer, 21(8), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sarter, N., Woods, D.D., & Billings, C. E. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human factors/Ergonomics, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Scerri, P., Pynadath, D., & Tambe, M. (2002). Adjustable autonomy for the real world. In R. Falcone (Ed.), Agent Autonomy, (pp. 163–190). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sierhuis, M. (2001) Brahms: A Multi-Agent Modeling and Simulation Language for Work System Analysis and Design. Doctoral, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Smith, D. C, Cypher, A., & Spohrer, J. (1997). KidSim: Programming Agents without a Programming Language. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software Agents, (pp. 165–190). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sowa, J. F. (1989). Knowledge acquisition by teachable systems. In J. P. Martins & E. M. Morgado (Ed.), EPIA 89, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 381–396). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Still, D. L., & Temme, L. A. (2001). OZ: A human-centered cockpit display. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference. Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  79. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Suri, N., Bradshaw, J. M., Breedy, M. R., Groth, P. T., Hill, G. A., & Jeffers, R. (2000). Strong Mobility and Fine-Grained Resource Control in NOMADS. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Agents Systems and Applications and the 4th International Symposium on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA 2000). Zurich, Switzerland, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tambe, M., Pynadath, D., Chauvat, C, Das, A., & Kaminka, G. (2000). Adaptive agent architectures for heterogeneous team members. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tambe, M., Shen, W., Mataric, M., Pynadath, D. V., Goldberg, D., Modi, P. J., Qiu, Z., & Salemi, B. (1999). Teamwork in cyberspace: Using TEAMCORE to make agents team-ready. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agents in Cyberspace. Menlo Park, CA, Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wiener, E. L. (1989). Human Factors of Advanced Technology, “Glass Cockpit” Transport Aircraft. NASA Contractor Report No. 177528. NASA Ames Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  84. Woods, D. D. (2002). Steering the reverbereations of technology change on fields of practice: Laws that govern cognitive work. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Woods, D. D., & Sarter, N. (2000). Learning from automation surprises and going sour accidents. In N. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Ed.), Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC), University of West Florida, 40 S. Alcaniz, Pensacola, FL, 32501

    Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Paul Feltovich, Robert Hoffman, Renia Jeffers, Niranjan Suri & Andrzej Uszok

  2. RIACS and QSS, NASA Ames, MS T35B-1, Moffett Field, CA, 94035

    Maarten Sierhuis & Ron Van Hoof

  3. SIMS, UC Berkeley, 102 South Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720

    Alessandro Acquisti

  4. The Boeing Company, 499 Boeing Blvd. MS JW-75, P.O. Box 240002, Huntsville, AL, 35824

    Debbie Prescott

Authors
  1. Jeffrey M. Bradshaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maarten Sierhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Acquisti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Feltovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Renia Jeffers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Debbie Prescott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Niranjan Suri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andrzej Uszok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ron Van Hoof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arkansas, Italy

    Henry Hexmoor

  2. National Research Council, Italy

    Cristiano Castelfranchi  & Rino Falcone  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradshaw, J.M. et al. (2003). Adjustable Autonomy and Human-Agent Teamwork in Practice: An Interim Report on Space Applications. In: Hexmoor, H., Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (eds) Agent Autonomy. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol 7. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9198-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9198-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4833-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9198-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation