Skip to main content

Playing with PANDA: The CybOrg and the Rhizome

  • Chapter
Community Operational Research

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

We have introduced elsewhere (Taket and White, 2000), a framework that we have developed, called PANDA (participatory appraisal of needs and development of action), which we use as we plan and implement group working and group decision-making in the multi-agency setting. We devel-oped PANDA in the process of critically reflecting on our own practice and that of others. Much of our own practice (both individually and together) has been in the field of community operational research. Underlying PANDA are a number of theoretical principles, which we label pragmatic pluralism. PANDA is based on a theoretical stance that we unashamedly label post-structuralist or postmodernist (Taket and White, 1993), and as such, makes no grand claims for being uniquely justifiable, or for devel-oped success in application. PANDA represents one particular type of multimethodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, W.R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1956). The impact of cybernetics on the concept of industrial organization. Reprinted in How Many Grapes went into the Wine: Stafford Beer on the Art and Science of Holistic Management. Harnden, R. and Leonard, A. (eds.). Chichester, Wiley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1962). Towards the cybernetic factory. Reprinted in How Many Grapes went into the Wine: Stafford Beer on the Art and Science of Holistic Management. Harnden, R. and Leonard, A. (eds.). Chichester, Wiley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1995). Beyond Dispute. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. (1993). Supporting management teams: AIDA, groupware and computer group decision support systems. OR Insight, 6(3), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. London, Heinnemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C.B. (1992). My two cents worth on how OR should develop. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43(7), 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Tr. B. Massumi. London, Athlone, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1990). The unfolding nature of group decision support-two dimensions of skill. In Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support, pp. 48–52, Eden, C. and Radford, J. (eds.). London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L. (1981). Sociotechnical Systems. Sytsems Behaviour (ed.). Open Systems Group, Open University, Chapman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R.L. and Jackson, M.C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, J. and Hickling, A. (1987). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London, Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. (1991). Operational research in organizations: A metaphorical analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42(6), 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. and Mattelart, M. (1992). Rethinking Media Theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Revised edition. Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. (1965). Embodiments of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organisation. Sage, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, H. (1992). Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide. Abbott, Potomac, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1979). Illness as Metaphor. Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1989). AIDS and its Metaphors. Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1994). The man versus the state. In Herbert Spencer: Political Writings, Offer, J. (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A.R. and White, L.A. (1993). After OR: An agenda for postmodernism and post structuralism in OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44(9), 867–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A.R. and White, L.A. (1994). Doing community operational research with multicultural groups. Omega: International Journal of Management Science, 22(6), 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A.R. and White, L.A. (1996). Pragmatic pluralism-an explication. Systems Practice, 9(6), 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A.R. and White, L.A. (2000). Partnership and Participation: Decision-making in the Multiagency Setting. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (1991). Organisational metaphors and information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and Machine. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Blue and Brown Books. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taket, A., White, L. (2004). Playing with PANDA: The CybOrg and the Rhizome. In: Midgley, G., Ochoa-Arias, A. (eds) Community Operational Research. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8911-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8911-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4716-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8911-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics