Skip to main content

Assessment of Biotic Patterns in Freshwater Ecosystems

  • Chapter
A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments

Abstract

Whether curse or blessing, scientists and managers have developed a multitude of approaches to the assessment of patterns in the biota of freshwater ecosystems. Several rather independent traditions in aquatic ecology have focused on the relationship of ecological pattern to physical pattern and process. Approaches that focus on broad-scale, regional patterns may completely miss aspects of the ecosystem that are critical to the survival of rare taxa in special habitats, just as approaches that focus on rare species or endangered populations may provide little information about the broader biotic community and its response to an ecological change (Table 26.1). Today’s natural resource laws, societal expectations, limited fiscal resources, and declining biotic resources demand that these once separate strands converge in a more holistic approach to ecological assessment. This brief review cannot aspire to map a clear path toward meeting that major challenge, but is intended only to till the ground for future synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, J. D.; Flecker, A. S. 1993. Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience43:32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. D.; Erickson, D. L.; Fay, J. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol.37:149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, F. W.; Bayles, D.; Bottom, D. L.; Currens, K. P.; Frissell, C. A.; Hankin, D.; Lichatowich, J. A.; Nehlsen, W.; Trotter, P. C.; Williams, T. H. 1997. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conserv.Biol. 11:140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoros, C.; Rostan, J. C.; Pautou, G.; Bravard, J. P. 1987a. The reversible process concept applied to the environmental management of fluvial hydrosystems. Environ. Manage.11:607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoros, C.; Roux, L.; Reygrobellet, J. L.; Bravard, J. P.; Pautou, G. 1987b. A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regul. River. 1:17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, C. V.; Frissell, C. A.; Hauer, F. R. 1999. Geomorphology, logging roads, and the distribution of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning in a forested river basin: implications for management and conservation. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.128(5):854–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. J. F. 1995. The contribution of flood disturbance, catchment geology, and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol.33:419–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravard, J. P.; Amoros, C.; Pautou, G. 1986. Impact of civil engineering works on the successions of communities in a fluvial system. Oikis47:92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, S. A.; Clarke, S. E. 1997. Landscape-level ecological regions: linking state-level ecological frameworks with stream habitat. Environ. Manage.20:297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R.; Kitchell, J. F.; Hodgson, J. R. 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience35:634–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corkum, L. D. 1989. Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North America. Freshwater Biol.21:191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corkum, L. D. 1990. Intrabiome distributional patterns of lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.47:2147–2157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp, J. M.; Davies, R. W. 1982. Analysis of longitudinal zonation and the River Continuum Concept in the Oldman-South Saskatchewan River system. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.39:1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decamps, H.; Fortuné, M.; Gazelle, F.; Pautou, G. 1988. Historical influence of man on the riparian dynamics of a fluvial landscape. Landscape Ecol.1:163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, B.; Scurlock, M.; Frissell, C.; Karr, J. 1993. Entering the watershed: a new approach to save America’s river ecosystems.Covelo, CA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M.; Nilsson, C. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science266:753–762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole, J. L.; Liss, W. J.; Frissell, C. A. 1997. Restoration of stream habitats in the western United States: restoration as re-expression of habitat capacity. Environ. Manage.21(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. O.; Nicholls, K. H.; Allen, Y. C.; McMurtry, M. J. 1996. Historical land use, phosphorus loading, and loss of fish habitat in Lake Simcoe, Canada. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Supplement 1):194–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D.; Karr, J. R.; Yant, P. R. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc. 113:39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fore, S.; Karr, J. R.; Wisseman, R. W. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.15: 212–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A. 1993. Topology of extinction and endangerment of fishes in the Pacific Northwest and California. Conserv. Biol.7:342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A.; Bayles, D. 1996. Ecosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity. Water Resour. Bull.32:229–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A.; Liss, W. J.; Warren, C. E.; Hurley, M. D. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ. Manage.10:199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A.; Liss, W. J.; Gresswell, R. E.; Nawa, R. K.; Ebersole, J. L. 1997. A resource in crisis: changing the measure of salmon management. In: Stouder, D. J.; Bisson, P. A.; Naiman, R. J., eds. Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options.New York: Chapman and Hall: 411–444.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M. 1985. Use of watershed characteristics to select control streams for estimating effects of metal mining wastes on extensively disturbed streams. Environ. Manage.9:253–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M.; Larsen, D. P.; Omernik, J. M. 1986. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potential. Environ. Manage.10:629–635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, C. T.; Levine, D. A. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. BioScience 45:193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C. 1994. River expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: patterns and causes. Ecol. Monogr.64:45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1:61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R.; Chu, E. W. 1997. Biological monitoring and assessment: using multimetric indices effectively.EPA 235-R97-001. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. R. M.; Minns, C. K. 1996. Is fish species richness at sites in the Canadian Great Lakes the result of local or regional factors? Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 53(Supplement 1):175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. R. M.; Steedman, R. J.; Stoddart, S. 1996. Historical causes of change in Great Lakes fish stocks and the implications for ecosystem rehabilitation. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Supplement 1):10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H.; Lindström, J.; Ranta, E. 1997. Risk analysis of hunting of seal populations in the Baltic. Conserv. Biol.11:917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratz, T. K.; Webster, K. E.; Bowser, C. J.; Magnuson, J. J.; Benson, B. J. 1997. The influence of landscape position on lakes in northern Wisconsin. Freshwater Biol.37:209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck, R. J. 1997. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol.11:849–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. A.; Lester, N. P.; Bradshaw, A. D.; Fitzgibbon J.; Fuller, K.; Hakanson, L.; Richards, C. 1996. Considerations of scale in habitat conservation and restoration. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Supplement l): 440–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, F. K.; Dietrich, W. E.; Trush, W. J. 1995. Downstream ecological effects of dams: a geomorphic perspective. BioScience45:183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnuson, J. J.; Benson, B.; Kratz, T. 1990. Temporal coherence in the limnology of a suite of lakes in Wisconsin, U.S.A. Freshwater Biol.23:145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Master, L. 1990. The imperiled status of North American aquatic animals. The Nature Conservancy: Biodiversity Network News3:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusek, J. E. 1978. Empirical predictions of fish yields of large North American lakes. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.107:385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minns, C. K.; Kelso, J. R. M.; Randall, R. G. 1996. Detecting the response of fish to habitat alterations in freshwater ecosystems. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 53(Supplement l):403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W. 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: a global perspective. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.7:263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R.; Grant, G. E.; Sullivan, K. 1995. Watershed analysis as a framework for implementing ecosystem management. Water Resour. Bull.31:369-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B. 1986. Fish introductions into North America: patterns and ecological impact. In: Mooney, H.; Drake, J. A., eds. Biological invasions in North America. New York: Springer-Verlag: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B.; Randall, P. J. 1998. Evaluating biotic integrity of watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, California. Conserv. Biol.12:1318–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P. B.; Sato, G. M. 1991. On the design of preserves to protect native fishes. In: Minckley, W. L.; Deacon, J. E., eds. Battle against extinction: native fish management in the American West.Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntkittrick, K. R.; Dixon, D. G. 1989. A holistic approach to ecosystem health assessment using fish population characteristics. Hydrobiologia188/189:123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. J.; Rorslett, B.; Springuel, I. 1990. Strategy analysis of submerged lake macrophyte communities: an international example. Aquat. Bot.36:303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J.; Lozarich, D. G.; Beechie, T. J.; Ralph, S. C. 1992. General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential. In: Boon, P. J.; Calow, P.; Petts, G. E., eds. River conservation and management.New York: John Wiley & Sons: 93–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J.; Magnuson, J. J.; McKnight, D. M.; Stanford, J. A., editors. 1995. Freshwater imperative: a research agenda.Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehlsen, W.; Lichatowich, J. A.; Williams, J. E. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr.77:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M.; Bailey, R. G. 1997. Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc.33:935–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plante, C.; Downing, J. A. 1993. Relationship of salmonine production to lake trophic status and temperature. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.50:1324–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. 1996. A hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale-dependence in some hydrological descriptors. Freshwater Biol.36:606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.16:391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L.; Allan, J. D. 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology76:606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L.; Ward, J. V. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.46:1805–1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L.; Ward, J. V. 1990. The physical habitat template of lotic ecosystems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Environ. Manage.14:629–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L.; Allan, J. D.; Bain, M. B.; Karr, J. R.; Prestegaard, K. L.; Richter, B. D.; Sparks, R. E.; Stromberg, J. C. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience47: 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, G. C.; Frissell, C. A.; Ralph, S. C. 1997. In-stream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc.33:879–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E.; Tilman, D.; Estes, J. A.; Menge, B. A.; Bond, W. J.; Mills, L. S.; Daily, G.; Castilla, U. C.; Lubchenco, J.; Paine, R. T. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience46:609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, C. M. 1997. Exploring how disturbance is transmitted upstream: going against the flow. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.16:425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, C. M.; Naiman, R. J.; Bretschko, G.; Karr, J. R.; Oswood, M. W.; Webster, J. R.; Welcomme, R. L.; Winterbourne, M. J. 1988. Patch dynamics in lotie ecosystems: the stream as mosaic. 7. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc.7:411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M.; Hickey, C. W. 1990. Magnitude of effects of substrate particle size, recent flooding, and watershed development on benthic invertebrates in 88 New Zealand rivers. N. Z. J. Freshwater Mar. Res.24:411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, S.; Lande, R.; Roper, B. B. 1997. Population viability analysis of spring Chinook salmon in the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Conserv. Biol.11:879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reavie, E. D.; Smol, J. P.; Carmichael, N. B. 1995. Post-settlement eutrophication of six British Columbia (Canada) lakes. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.52:2388–2401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C.; Johnson, L. B.; Host, G. E. 1996. Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Supplement 1):295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D.; Baumgartner, J. V.; Powell, J.; Braun, D. P. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologie alteration within ecosystems. Conserv. Biol.10:1163–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B.D.; Baumgartner, J. V.; Wigington, R.; Braun, D. P. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biol.37:231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, B. E.; Mclntyre, J. D. 1993. Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of bull trout. INT-GTR-302. Ogden, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Intermountain For. Range Exp. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieman, B. E.; Mclntyre, J. D. 1995. Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of various size. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.124:285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E.; Allan, J. D.; Erickson, D. L. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecol.11:141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, L. F.; Hayward, G. D.; Squires, J. R. 1994. Viability analysis in biological evaluations: concepts of population viability analysis, biological population, and ecological scale. Conserv. Biol.8:364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. J. 1990. Environmental variation, life history attributes, and community structure in stream fishes: implications for environmental management assessment. Environ. Manage.14:621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. J. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience41:704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedell, J. R.; Reeves, G. H.; Hauer, F. R.; Stanford, J. A.; Hawkins, C. P. 1990. Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Environ. Manage.14:711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. L. 1988. Conservation of stream fishes: patterns of diversity, rarity and risk. Conserv. Biol.2: 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smol, J. P.; Brown, S. R.; McNeely, R. 1983. Cultural disturbances and trophic history of a small meromictic lake from central Canada. Hydrobiologia103:125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E. 1977. Habitata, the templet for ecological strategies. J. Anim. Ecol.46:337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C. N.; McClelland, B. R.; Stanford, J. A. 1991. Shrimp stocking, salmon collapse, and eagle displacement. BioScience41:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A.; Ward, J. V. 1992. Management of aquatic resources in large catchments: recognizing interactions between ecosystem connectivity and environmental disturbance. In: Naiman, R. J., ed. Watershed management. New York: Springer-Verlag: 91–124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A.; Ward, J. V.; Liss, W. J.; Frissell, C. A.; Williams, R. N.; Lichatowich, J. A.; Coutant, C. C. 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regul. River.12:391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B.; Higler, B. 1986. Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns. Freshwater Biol.16:127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, R. J. 1988. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 45:492–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, R. J.; Whillans, T. H.; Behm, A. P.; Bray, K. E.; Cullis, K. L; Holland, M. M.; Stoddart, S. J.; White, R. J. 1996. Use of historical information for conservation and restoration of Great Lakes aquatic habitat. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.53(Supplement 1):415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy. 1997. A classification framework for freshwater communities. In: Proceedings of The Nature Conservancy’s aquatic community classification workshop; April 9-11, 1996, New Haven, MO. Chicago: The Nature Conservancy, Great Lakes Program Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, W. M.; Magnuson, J. J.; Forbes, A. M. 1983. Community analysis of fishery management: an application with northern Wisconsin lakes. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc.112:368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, W. M.; Magnuson, J. J.; Rask, M.; Toivonen, J. 1990. Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages: the balance between local and regional processes. Amer. Naturalist136:345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R.; Hildrew, A. 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biol.31:265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L.; Minshall, G. W.; Cummins K. W.; Sedell, J. R.; Cushing, C. E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.37:130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. 1997. An expansive perspective of riverine landscapes: pattern and process across scales. Gaia 6(1):52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E. 1979. Toward classification and rationale for watershed management and stream protection.Report No. EPA-600/3-79-059. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. 1983. Limnology,2nd ed. New York: CBS College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. J.; Kohler, S. L.; Seelbach, P. 1997. Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams. Freshwater Biol.37:133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. D.; Warren, M. L., Jr.; Cummings, K. S.; Harris, J. L.; Neves, R. J. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries18(9):6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E.; Johnson, J. E.; Hendrickson, D. A.; Contreras Balderas, S.; Williams, J. D.; Navarro-Mendoza, M.; McAllister, D. E.; Deacon, J. E. 1989. Fishes of North America, endangered, threatened, or of special concern. Fisheries14(6):2–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret, T. M. 1982. The stability/diversity controversy: a test of hypotheses. Ecology63:721–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, P. 1992. Stream habitat fragmentation—a threat to biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv.1:80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frissell, C.A., Poff, N.L., Jensen, M.E. (2001). Assessment of Biotic Patterns in Freshwater Ecosystems. In: Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (eds) A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98583-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8620-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics