Skip to main content

Time-dependent Perturbations in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Part of the book series: Graduate Texts in Physics ((GTP))

  • 4084 Accesses

Abstract

The development of time-dependent perturbation theory was initiated by Paul Dirac’s early work on the semi-classical description of atoms interacting with electromagnetic fields

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 112, 661 (1926).

  2. 2.

    F.J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949).

  3. 3.

    The transformation law for operators from the Schrödinger picture into the interaction picture implies H D (t) ≡ V D (t). The notation V D (t) is therefore also often used for H D (t).

  4. 4.

    If the perturbation V (t) contains directional information (e.g. polarization of an incoming photon or the direction of an electric field), then we might also like to calculate probabilities for the direction of dissociation of the hydrogen atom. This direction would be given by the k vector of relative motion between the electron and the proton after separation. For the calculation of directional information we would have to combine the spherical Coulomb waves | k, , m⟩ into states which approximate plane wave states | k⟩ at infinity, similar to the construction of incoming approximate plane wave states in Section \e13.5, see also the discussion of the photoeffect in [2].

  5. 5.

    Recall that the notation tacitly implies dependence of the operators V and W on x and p (just like we usually write H instead of H(x, p) for a Hamilton operator).

  6. 6.

    G. Wentzel, Z. Phys. 43, 524 (1927).

  7. 7.

    J.R. Oppenheimer, Z. Phys. 55, 725 (1929).

  8. 8.

    W. Wessel, Annalen Phys. 397, 611 (1930); E.C.G. Stückelberg & P.M. Morse, Phys. Rev. 36, 16 (1930); M. Stobbe, Annalen Phys. 399, 661 (1930).

  9. 9.

    Alternatively, we could have used box normalization for the incoming plane waves, \(\langle x\vert k\rangle =\exp (\mathrm{i}k \cdot x)/\sqrt{V}\) both in dw k → k′ and in j ( ⇒ j = ℏk ∕ (mV ) = v ∕ V ), or we could have rescaled both dw k → k′ and j with the conversion factor 8π3 ∕ V to make both quantities separately dimensionally correct, [dw k → k′ ] = s − 1, [j] = cm − 2s − 1. All three methods yield the same dimensionally correct result for the scattering cross section, of course.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Dick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dick, R. (2012). Time-dependent Perturbations in Quantum Mechanics. In: Advanced Quantum Mechanics. Graduate Texts in Physics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8077-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8077-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8076-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8077-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics