Skip to main content

Surgical Timeout and Retained Foreign Bodies – Patient Safety in the Operating Room

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

There has been much debate about patient safety after the release of the landmark report To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [1]. The authors report 44,000–98,000 deaths per year due to medical errors in the United States. The IOM called for more than 50% decrease in the number of deaths within the 5 years following that publication establishing goals and strategies to achieve this result. These goals include: (1) Establishing a national focus to create leadership, research, tools, and protocols to enhance knowledge. (2) Identifying and learning from errors by developing a nationwide, public, mandatory reporting system, and by encouraging healthcare organizations and practitioners to develop and participate in voluntary reporting systems. (3) Raising performance standards and expectations for improvements in safety through the actions of oversight organizations, professional groups, and group purchasers of healthcare. (4) Implementing safety systems in healthcare organizations to ensure safe practices at the delivery level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected Readings

  1. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. http://www.iom.edu/∼/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/To-Err-is-Human/To%20Err%20is%20Human%201999%20%20report%20brief.ashx.

  2. Brennan T, Gawande A, Thomas E, Studdert D. Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1405–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark J, Johnston J, Blanco M, Martindell D. Wrong-site surgery: can we prevent it? Adv Surg. 2008;42:13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, et al. A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery. 2006;139(2):159–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs VC, Coakley FD, Reines HD. Preventable errors in the operating room – part 2: retained foreign objects, sharps injuries, and wrong site surgery. Curr Prbl Surg. 2007;44:352–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Facts about the Universal Protocol – Joint Commission. 2010. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/UniversalProtocol/up_facts.htm. Accessed 19 May 2010.

  7. Kwaan M, Studdert D, Zinner M, Gawande A. Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canale ST. Wrong-site surgery, a preventable complication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:26–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Michaels R, Makary M, Dahab Y, et al. Achieving the national quality forum’s “never events” prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong patient operations. Ann Surg. 2007;245:526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeVine J, Chutkan N, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. Avoiding wrong site surgery, a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35:S25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs VC. Patient safety practices in the operating room: correct-site surgery and nothing left behind. Surg Clin N Am. 2005;85:1307–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiser TG, Hanes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Gawande AA. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg. 2010;251:976–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haynes A, Weiser T, Berry W, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs VC, Coakley FD, Reines HD. Preventable errors in the operating room: retained foreign bodies after surgery – Part I. Curr Probl Surg. 2007;44:281–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan W, Le T, Riskin L, Macario A. Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gawande A, Studdert D, Orav EJ, Brennan T, Zinner M. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:229–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, Sechrist C, Kercher K, Henifor BT. Retained foreign bodies after surgery. J Surg Res. 2007;138:170–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Weiss MD, FACS, FASCRS, FACG .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiss, E., Corning, C. (2012). Surgical Timeout and Retained Foreign Bodies – Patient Safety in the Operating Room. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics