Skip to main content

Accreditation Standards: Bariatric Surgery and Beyond

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

The dictionary defines the word “accreditation” as the process in which certification of competency, authority, or credibility is presented. Authoritative bodies concern themselves with the accreditation of processes or programs. Since the SAGES manual is concerned with the areas of patient safety, outcomes, and quality, the focus of this chapter will be to review the relevant history and experience of the accreditation process of surgical programs in this country to date, as a basis for understanding the accreditation process as it currently exists and as it interfaces with patient safety and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Readings

  1. Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, Belle SH, Bessler M, Courcoulas AP, et al. Relationship between surgical volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2010;6:118–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schirmer B, Jones DB. The American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: establishing standards. Bull Am College Surg. 2007;92:21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare and Medicaid programs: electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Federal Register 2010;75:44313–588.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The effect of financial incentives on hospitals that serve poor patients. Ann Int Med. 2010;153:299–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuman HB, Michelassi F, Turner JW, Bass BL. Surrrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP? Surgery. 2009;145:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Schirmer MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schirmer, B. (2012). Accreditation Standards: Bariatric Surgery and Beyond. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics