Skip to main content

NOTES: Common Complications and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) may have potential advantages when compared with traditional transabdominal or transthoracic surgical approaches. These include better cosmesis, fewer incisional hernias, decreased postoperative pain, and quicker return to full function. Human NOTES procedures performed worldwide thus far seem to confirm these benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected Readings

  1. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(2):329–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn DK, Turner BG, Gee DW, Willingham FF, Sylla P, Cizginer S, et al. Reducing the unexpectedly high rate of injuries caused by NOTES gastrotomy creation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Sousa LH, de Sousa JA, de Sousa Filho LH, de Sousa MM, de Sousa VM, de Sousa AP, et al. Totally NOTES (T-NOTES) transvaginal cholecystectomy using two endoscopes: preliminary report. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2550–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Marescaux J. Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96(10):1162–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hensel M, Schernikau U, Schmidt A, Arlt G. Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective case–control study. Zentralbl Chir. 2010 May.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zorron R, Palanivelu C, Galvao Neto MP, Ramos A, Salinas G, Burghardt J, et al. International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery: NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients. Surg Innov. 2010;17(2):142–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A, Gellert K, Zornig C, Burghardt J, et al. The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, et al. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(1):16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narula VK, Happel LC, Volt K, Bergman S, Roland JC, Dettorre R, et al. Transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy does not require decontamination of the stomach in humans. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1331–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Narula VK, Hazey JW, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, et al. Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(3):605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Holland C, Olagbeye F, Hardeler KG, Seehusen F, et al. Beyond NOTES: randomized controlled study of different methods of flexible endoscopic hemostasis of artificially induced hemorrhage, via NOTES access to the peritoneal cavity. Endoscopy. 2009;41(1):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park PO, Long GL, Bergstrom M, Cunningham C, Vakharia OJ, Bakos GJ, et al. A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intra-abdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(4):835–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(5):1205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA. Transesophageal mediastinoscopy by submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap safety valve technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(4):679–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gee DW, Willingham FF, Lauwers GY, Brugge WR, Rattner DW. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy: a survival series in swine. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(10):2117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritscher-Ravens A, Patel K, Ghanbari A, Kahle E, von Herbay A, Fritscher T, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the mediastinum: long-term survival animal experiments in transesophageal access, including minor surgical procedures. Endoscopy. 2007;39(10):870–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. von Renteln D, Eickhoff A, Kaehler G, Riecken B, Caca K. Endoscopic closure of the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study. Endoscopy. 2009;41(2):154–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turner BG, Cizginer S, Kim MC, Mino-Kenudson M, Ducharme RW, Surti VC, et al. Stent placement provides safe esophageal closure in thoracic NOTES(TM) procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):913–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42(4):265–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Allemann P, Marescaux J. Multimedia manuscript. Heller myotomy and intraluminal fundoplication: a NOTES technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pauli EM, Mathew A, Haluck RS, Ionescu AM, Moyer MT, Shope TR, et al. Technique for transesophageal endoscopic cardiomyotomy (Heller myotomy): video presentation at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2008, Philadelphia, PA. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(10):2279–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spaun GO, Dunst CM, Arnold BN, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanstrom LL. Transcervical Heller myotomy using flexible endoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(12):1902–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner BG, Gee DW. Natural orifice transesophageal thoracoscopic surgery: A review of the current state. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clark J, Sodergren M, Correia-Pinto J, Zacharakis E, Teare J, Yang GZ, et al. Natural orifice translumenal thoracoscopic surgery: does the slow progress and the associated risks affect feasibility and potential clinical applications? Surg Innov. 2009;16(1):9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Knipschield MA, Chung S, et al. Pilot study of transesophageal endoscopic epicardial coagulation by submucosal endoscopy with the mucosal flap safety valve technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(3):497–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Willingham FF, Gee DW, Lauwers GY, Brugge WR, Rattner DW. Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):1042–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise W. Gee MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gee, D.W., Rattner, D.W. (2012). NOTES: Common Complications and Management. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics