Skip to main content

Data Drives Quality: ACS–NSQIP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety

Abstract

Continuous quality improvement requires ongoing data collection and analysis. This chapter will assess the importance of high-quality data to assess the quality of surgical care given, to identify areas for improvement, to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives, and for ongoing monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Selected Readings

  1. Codman EA. A study in hospital efficiency. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: JCAHO; 1996. p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hutter MM, Jones DB, Riley S Jr M, Snow RL, Cella RJ, Schneider BE, et al. Best practice updates for weight loss surgery data collection. Lehman Center Weight Loss Surgery Expert Panel. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Betsy Lehman Center for patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction. Obesity. 2009;17(5):924–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44:166–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):626–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutter MM. Does outcomes research impact quality? Examples from Bariatric Surgery. Am Surg. 2006;72(11):1055–60. discussion 1061–9, 1133–1148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris TG, Torchiana DF. Public release of clinical outcomes data – Online CABG Report Cards. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1593–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, Jonasson O, Jones RS, Campbell Jr DA, et al. Principal Investigators of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, Finlayson SR, Flum DR, Ko CY, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(5):777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew M. Hutter MD, MPH .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hutter, M.M. (2012). Data Drives Quality: ACS–NSQIP. In: Tichansky, MD, FACS, D., Morton, MD, MPH, J., Jones, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7901-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7901-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics