Skip to main content

The Evolution of Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Entrepreneurial Finance
  • 2362 Accesses

Abstract

We have evolved “as if” reproduction is the sole goal for which human beings were “designed,” and everything else is a means to that end. However, natural selection is a slow process, and Homo sapiens originated about 200,000 years ago, so our minds today are adapted to maximize gene replication in the Pleistocene. Meanwhile, an investor seeking to maximize wealth, Homo economicus, should behave according to expected utility theory. Aspects of the behavior of Homo sapiens that differ from Homo economicus include the endowment effect, loss aversion, risk aversion, overconfidence, optimism, the representativeness heuristic, the availability heuristic and herding. This chapter speculates how these heuristics and biases may have evolved, and focuses on their effect on entrepreneurs and venture capitalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As the subjective Bayesian Bruno de Finetti famously noted, “probability does not exist,” but the point here is that we prefer to assign a subjective probability with ease.

  2. 2.

    Gossip was of great importance from an evolutionary perspective, see Dunbar (1996).

  3. 3.

    Another important implication of the failure rate is that any study of entrepreneurs suffers from survivorship bias.

References

  • Atmar, W. 1991. On the role of males. Animal Behaviour 41: 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.M., and T. Odean. 2001. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics 49: 307–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A.E., and I. Welch. 2001. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10: 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Co-mentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5: 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D. 1954. Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica 22: 23–36. English translation of Bernoulli (1738) by Sommer L.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M.H. 2008. New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychological Review 115: 463–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Z.J. Acs, E. Autio, A. Coduras, J. Levie. 2009. Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2008 executive report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. 1961. Optimal gambling systems for favorable games. In Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol. I, ed. J. Neyman, 65–78. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocas, I., and J.D. Carrillo. 2004. Entrepreneurial boldness and excessive investment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 13: 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C., N. Carter, E. Gatewood, P. Greene, and M. Hart 2004. Gatekeepers of venture growth: A Diana Project report on the role and participation of women in the venture capital industry. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L.W., and J.B. Barney. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. 2008. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind, 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, G. 2010. Are individuals entering self-employment overly optimistic? An empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations. Strategic Management Journal 31: 822–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.J., and K.J. Saral. 2010. Entrepreneurship and team participation: An experimental study. Working paper. Florida State University, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A.C., C.Y. Woo, and W.C. Dunkelberg. 1988. Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing 3: 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. 1989. The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition 31: 187–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby. 1996. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58: 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. 1937. La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7: 1–68. Translated into English as Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources. In Studies in Subjective Probability, eds. H.E. Kyburg Jr, and H.E. Smokler, pp. 93–158. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. 1996. Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, D. 2006. A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making 1: 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., and U. Hoffrage. 1995. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review l02: 684–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. 2007. The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D., and A. Tversky. 1992. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology 24: 411–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.W., and E.E. Rutström. 2009. Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics 12: 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J., J. van der Sluis, and M. van Praag. 2007. Returns to intelligence: Entrepreneurs versus employees. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M.G., and D. Nettle. 2006. The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headd, B. 2003. Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics 21: 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly Jr., J.L. 1956. A new interpretation of information rate. The Bell System Technical Journal 35: 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J.G. 1955. Fair bets and inductive probabilities. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 20: 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, R.S. 1955. On confirmation and rational betting. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 20: 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 2002. When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective ‘public venture capital’ programmes. The Economic Journal 112: F73–F84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. 2009. Dyslexic entrepreneurs: The incidence; their coping strategies and their business skills. Dyslexia 15: 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L.C., W.T. Ziemba, and G. Blazenko. 1992. Growth versus security in dynamic investment analysis. Management Science 38: 1562–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, P. 2008. Optimal portfolio modeling: Models to maximize returns and control risk in Excel and R + CD (Wiley Trading). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxon, S. 2008. The woman racket: The new science explaining how the sexes relate at work, at play and in society. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. 2001. The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: Vintage. Originally published: 2000, London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. 1926. Truth and probability. In The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, Chapter VII, ed. R.B. Braithwaite, 156–198. London: Kegan, Trench, Trübner, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahakian, B., A. Lawrence, L. Clark, J.N. Labuzetta, B. Sahakian, and S. Vyakarnum. 2008. The innovative brain. Nature 456: 168–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, M. 2008. Gender (sic) equality (sic). Opticon1826, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A. 1955. Coherence and the axioms of confirmation. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 20: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W., and A.J. Weichenrieder. 1993. The biological selection of risk preferences. In Risk is a construct: Perceptions of risk perception, ed. B. Rückversicherung, 67–83. Munich: Knesebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2009. A special report on entrepreneurship, 12 March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, L. 1995. Optimism: The biology of hope. New York: Kodansha. Originally published: 1979, New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis, A.L., and D.A. Shepherd. 2001. The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making. Journal of Business Venturing 16: 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Sewell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sewell, M. (2011). The Evolution of Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists. In: Advances in Entrepreneurial Finance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7527-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics