Skip to main content

The Cognitive Approach to Morality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Why do people feel that some action, institution or state of affairs is fair, legitimate or good, or not? Explaining these feelings means finding out their causes. According to the cognitive approach to morality this amounts to disentangling the reasons as to why people feel so. Durkheim, Max Weber, and many classical and modern social scientists use this approach in their analyses of moral feelings. But it remains in most cases implicit. Weber makes nowhere explicit his notion of axiological rationality. The aim of this chapter is to make this notion analytical and to extend it into a theory of moral feelings. Examples from various sociological chapters, as the moral feelings aroused by inequalities, by political or economic institutions or by current moral practices and values, illustrate the explanatory power of this approach. They suggest that the theory is a powerful tool to explain the development of collective consensus on various issues and also the long- and middle-term changes in moral feelings. The theory avoids the flaw of making moral feelings a mere emanation of socio-cultural contexts or alternatively of a contextual processes. It overcomes the opposition individuals society. It provides a tool to explain the moral feelings observed in the past and in other social contexts and thus to fight prejudice, to understand and even to predict change in moral feelings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boudon, R. 2008. Essais sur la théorie générale de la rationalité: Action sociale et sens commun. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. English translation forthcoming 2010: A Defense of Common Sense, Toward A General Theory Of Rationality. Oxford: The Bardwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1960 [1893]. De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1979[1912]. Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsé, M., and M. Parodi. 2004. La priorité du juste, éléments pour une sociologie des choix moraux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, N., and J. A. Oppenheimer. 1992. Choosing Justice, An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Oxford: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. et al. 2003. “Explaining Altruistic Behaviour in Humans.” Evolution and Human Behavior 24(3):153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” The Journal of Political Economy, 63(4):309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M. 2006. “Why Say No to Free Money?” Times Online, 7 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. et al. 1998. Human Values and Beliefs – A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook: Political, Religious, Sexual, and Economic Norms in 43 Societies. Findings From the 1990–1993 World Values Survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. 1967. “Some Problems About Rationality.” Archives Européennes de Sociologie 8(2):247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., P. E. Tetlock, B. A. Mellers, and L. D. Ordonez. 1993. “Judgements of Social Justice: Compromise Between Equality and Efficiency.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4): 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. et al. 1961. Theories of Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. 1954 (1670). Pensées. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, G. 1987. “La Perspective économique sur le Progrès Scientifique: Application en philosophie des Sciences de L’analyse Coût-Bénéfice.” Archives de philosophie 50:177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, S. 2007. What Democracy is For? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1954. Human Society in Ethics and Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. 1954. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik, in: Gesammelte Werke, vol. 2. Bern/Munich: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2002. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. et al. 1983. Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Aldershot (UK): Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1793. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 7th ed. London: Strahan & Cadell, Ch. X, 151–209. Reproduced in Parsons et al. (1961), I, 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukale, M. 1995. “Introduction to: Max Weber.” Schriften zur Soziologie. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1993. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1920. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der Sozialökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1995(1919) Wissenschaft als Beruf. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 1993. The Moral Sense. New York, Macmillan: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond Boudon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boudon, R. (2010). The Cognitive Approach to Morality. In: Hitlin, S., Vaisey, S. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics