Abstract
Non-destructive XRF analysis of obsidian artifacts presents unique challenges for quantitative trace element characterization. These empirical tests of the effects of sample size and surface configuration allow estimation of minimum size requirements for different analyses. The results also show that errors resulting from surface irregularities are usually insignificant relative to other errors in the analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bouey, P., (1991), Recognizing the limits of archaeological applications of non-destructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of obsidians. Materials Research Society Proceedings 185, 309–320.
Davis, M.K., (1994), Bremsstrahlung ratio technique applied to the non-destructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of obsidian. International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin 11.
Franzini, M., Leoni, L., and Saitta M., (1976), Determination of the X-ray fluorescence mass absorption coefficient by measurement of the intensity of Ag Kα Compton scattered radiation. X-ray Spectrometry 5:84–87.
Govindaraju, K., (1989), 1989 Compilation of working values and sample description for 272 geostandards. Geostandards Newsletter 13 (special issue).
Jenkins, R., Gould, R.W., and Gedcke, D., (1981), Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry. New York: Marcel Dekker
Hughes, R.E., (1984), Obsidian source studies in the Great Basin: Problems and Prospects. In Hughes, R.E., Ed., Obsidian Studies in the Great Basin, (pp. 1–20). Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 45.
Hughes RE (1988), The Coso Volcanic field reexamined: implications for obsidian sourcing and hydration dating research. Geoarchaeology 3:253–265
Jackson, T.L. and Hampel, J.H., (1992), Size effects in the energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis of archaeological obsidian artifacts. Presented at the 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Los Angeles.
McCarthy, J.J. and Schamber, F.H., (1981), Least-squares fit with digital filter: a status report. In Heinrich, K.F.J., Newbury, D.E., Myklebust, R.L. and Fiori, E. Eds., Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, (pp. 273–296). Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 604.
Schamber, F.H., (1977), A modification of the linear least-squares fitting method which provides continuum suppression. In Dzubay, T.G., Ed., X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Environmental Samples, (pp. 241–257). Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science.
Shackley MS (1988), Sources of archaeological obsidian in the Southwest: an archaeological, petrological, and geochemical study. American Antiquity 53:752–772
Shackley,M.S. and Hampel, J., (1992), Surface effects in the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis of archaeological obsidian. Presented at the 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Los Angeles.
Tatlock, D.B., Flanagan, F.J., Bastron, H., Berman, S., and Sutton, A.L. Jr., (1976), Rhyolite, RGM-1, from Glass Mountain, California. In Flanagan, F.J., Ed., Descriptions and Analyses of Eight New USGS Rock Standards. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 850, (pp. 11–14).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, M.K., Jackson, T.L., Shackley, M.S., Teague, T., Hampel, J.H. (2011). Factors Affecting the Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Analysis of Archaeological Obsidian. In: Shackley, M. (eds) X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6885-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6886-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)