Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective Memory Failure and the Metacognitive Experienceof “Blank in the Mind”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

Blank in the mind (BIM) is a metacognitive experience denoting that temporarily there is no content in consciousness. The metacognitive experience of BIM occurs in cases of prospective memory failure when the intention that guided one’s action (or the cue for the initiation of action) is not maintained in memory. A study is presented in which the hypothesis was that increased working memory load will increase the prospective memory failures and metacognitive experiences such as BIM, tip-of-the-tongue, awareness of omission, and awareness of commission errors. The results suggested that working memory load differentially affected the ratings of metacognitive experiences. Moreover, there was no correlation between BIM and tip-of-the-tongue ratings. The implications of the findings for theories of prospective memory failures and metacognition are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandimonte, M., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (Eds.) (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. (1966). The early symptoms of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Kerr, S. A. (1996). Commentary: Prospective memory, aging, and lapses of intention. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 227–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 286–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Williford, C. L., Pagan, J. L., & Dismukes, R. K. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., Smith, R. E., McDaniel, M. A., & Shaw, P. (1997). Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 12(3), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., McDaniel, M. A., & Morrisette, N. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(3), 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory. Psychological Research, 53(3), 260–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Sheffer, D. (1988). Telling the same story twice: Output monitoring and age. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Pearlman-Avnion, S., & Ben-Zur, H. (1998). The subjective organization of input and output events in memory. Psychological Research, 61(4), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loft, S., Kearney, R., & Remington, R. (2008). Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation? Memory and Cognition, 36(1), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(2), 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Hancock, T. W., & Munsayac, K. (2002). Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327–336). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D., & Perrig, W. J. (2006). Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory, 14(7), 872–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. (2000). Feelings and judgments of knowing: Is there a special noetic state? Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraitou, D., & Efklides, A. (2009). The Blank in the Mind questionnaire (BIMQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absent-minded? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimori, E., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Limiting attentional resources influences performance and output monitoring of an event-based prospective memory task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., MacLeod, A. K., & Morris, L. (1988). Associations between phenomenal and objective aspects of concentration problems in depressed patients. The British Journal of Psychology, 79, 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R., & Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Anastasia Efklides

Authors
  1. Anastasia Efklides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Touroutoglou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Efklides .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, 541 24, Greece

    Anastasia Efklides

  2. Dept. Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 451, Greece

    Plousia Misailidi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Efklides, A., Touroutoglou, A. (2010). Prospective Memory Failure and the Metacognitive Experienceof “Blank in the Mind”. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation