Skip to main content

Introduction: The Present and the Future in Metacognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Abstract

The introduction to the edited book entitled Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research is also a discussion of major issues that pervade current research in metacognition. These issues are at the background of the chapters of the book and set the stage for the identification of prospects for future research and theory in metacognition. Specifically, the introduction provides a brief description of the content of each chapter following the book’s organization in two parts: the first focusing on basic research in metacognition and the second on the developments and applications of metacognition in education. Then, the theoretical convergences and divergences between the chapters are discussed. The theoretical issues underlying the various chapters concern (a) the importance of uncertainty monitoring, (b) the nonconscious versus conscious processes in metacognition, (c) methodological issues in metacognition research, (d) individual differences in metacognition, and (e) metacognition and self-regulation. The need for theoretical integration is pointed out and the prospects for research that can encompass metacognitive phenomena and methodologies, which were not, or little, studied in the past, are envisaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Except for the term “nonconscious”, the term “unconscious” is also used in some of the chapters of this book.

References

  • Ariel, R., Dunlonsky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgments, and their interrelations. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review , 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–325). Hillsddale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one’s own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, B. (1993). Some philosophical and empirical implications of the fringe. Consciousness and Cognition, 2, 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., & Dardenne, B. (Eds.). (1998). Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Vol. 4. Big theories revisited. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Efklides .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (2010). Introduction: The Present and the Future in Metacognition. In: Efklides, A., Misailidi, P. (eds) Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics