Skip to main content
  • 589 Accesses

Abstract

Recent publications have pitted, on the one hand, the neutral theory of biodiversity – that leaves ample room for demographic processes such as reproduction, mortality, migrations, extinctions and speciation that have major random components – and, on the other hand, the ecological niche theory, more deterministic, that favours relationships with the environment and mechanisms between populations, especially competition. These two ecological theories, the foundations of which we review in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of this chapter, do not truly include the other levels of biological organisation where, as we have seen, processes of diversification play a role. They are, in fact, complementary if we assume that the same niche can be shared by different species, phylogenetically close or not, and that, simultaneously, demographic processes – the keys to the neutral theory – play a major role. In fact and as is customary in demographic approaches, we introduce environmental constraints by varying the demographic parameters or by observing variations that we can attribute to environmental factors. First, here are some obvious facts.

«… que se él fuera de su consejo al tiempo de la general criación del mundo, i de lo que en él se encierra, i se hallá con el, se huvieran producido i formado algunas cosas mejor que fueran hechas, i otras ni se hicieran, u se emmendaran i corrigieran»

(Alphonse X the Wise man, King of Castile and of Léon, 1221–1284)1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original version included by Jim Murray in one of his books (2001); the English translation proposed by Jim Murray is: “If the Lord Almighty had consulted me before embarking on creation, I should have recommended something simpler”. This remarkably curious and cultivated monarch would have voiced this when he was introduced to the Ptolemaic system. This idea seems interesting, especially since this text ensues from the contrary: perhaps this world functions because it is, if not complicated, complex.We can also think that Alphonse X is not alluding to the world, but to Ptolemy’s model, which is not easy to understand, and it is to Nicholas Copernicus’ credit to have drawn up a simpler representation. This historical reference is drawn from Koestler (2004).

  2. 2.

    Pavé et al. (2002).

  3. 3.

    In 1972, John Vandermeer wrote the first paper on the concept, entitled “Niche theory”.

  4. 4.

    cf., for example: Chave (2004); Chave et al. (2006).

References

  • Chave J., 2004, Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J., Alonso D., Etienne R.S., 2006, Comparing models of species abundance. Nature, 441, E1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Courtillot V., Gaudemer Y., 1996, Effects of mass extinctions on biodiversity. Nature, 381, 146–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P., 2001, The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabot F., Etienne R.S., Chave J., 2008, Reconciling neutral community models and environmental filtering: theory and an empirical test. Oikos, 117, 1308–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A., 2004, The Sleepwalkers, introduction by Herbert Butterfield and new preface by the author, London, Hutchinson, 1968. (Adapted from Hamel D. Nicolas Copernicus). Le Québec Sceptique, 54, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavé A., Hervé J.C., Schmidt-Lainé Cl., 2002, Mass extinctions, biodiversity explosions and ecological niches. C. R. Biologies, 325, 755–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A.G., 1935, The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3): 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov I., Banavar J.R., Hubbell S.P., Maritan A., 2003, Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 1035–1037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L., 1968, General System Theory. George Braziller, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whithfield J., 2002, Neutrality versus the niche. Nature, 417, 481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Pavé .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pavé, A. (2010). Biodiversity and Ecological Theories. In: On the Origins and Dynamics of Biodiversity: the Role of Chance. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6244-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics