Skip to main content

Assessing Today: Determining the Decision Value of Decision Support Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Support

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 14))

Abstract

Decision support systems (DSS) have been assessed on the basis of single criteria such as the improvement in decision outcome, and using multiple criteria such as the perspectives of different stakeholders. This paper uses a systems approach to extend previous studies by linking the type of support provided to the decision maker with the specific DSS design characteristics needed to deliver those services. The proposed framework is implemented with the Analytic Hierarchy Process to measure the overall decision value of a DSS and determine the precise contributions of individual characteristics to the value. An applied problem in intelligent DSS is shown to demonstrate the ability of the extended evaluation approach to provide guidance for further DSS design, development, and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adelman, L. (1992). Evaluating Decision Support and Expert Systems. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahituv, N., and Wand, Y. (1981). Information Systems in Management Science – Information Evaluation and Decision Makers’ Objectives. Interfaces, 11(3), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akoka, J. (1981). A Framework for Decision Support Systems Evaluation. Information & Management, 4, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. (2004). A Work System View of DSS in Its Fourth Decade. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. (1998). Beyond the Productivity Paradox: Computers are the Catalyst for Bigger Changes. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. (1982). A Multiple Criteria Approach for Evaluating Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 6(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2000). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., Jones, M., and Armstrong, C. (2007). The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(3), 579–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. (2002). The IT Payoff: Measuring the Business Value Information Technology Investments. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. (2003). Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom, S., and Kim, E. (2006). A Survey of Decision Support System Applications (1995–2001). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1264–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgionne, G. (1999). An AHP Model of DSS Effectiveness. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(2), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgionne, G. (2000). Decision-Making Support Systems Effectiveness: The Process to Outcome Link. Information Knowledge-Systems Management, 2, 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgionne, G., and Kohli, R. (2000). Management Support System Effectiveness: Further Empirical Evidence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(3), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorry, G. M., and Scott-Morton, M. S. (1971). A Framework for Management Information Systems. Sloan Management Review, 13(1), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P. (1988) The Art and Science of Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Working Paper 88-06-03, Decision Science Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, L., and Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20(2), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., and Whinston, A. B. (1996). Decision Support Systems. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, P., Muhanna, W., and Nault, B. (2008). Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between IT and Non-IT Resources. Decision Sciences, 39(4), 703–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. (1981). Value Analysis: Justifying Decision Support Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 5(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G. , Orasanu J. , Calderwood R. , and Zsambok C. , (Eds.) (1993). Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodogiannis, V. (2007). Decision Support Systems in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: Revisited. Intelligent Decision Technologies Journal, 1(1–2), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R., and Devaraj, S. (2003). Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurikose, A. (1985). Successful Decision Making Starts with DSS Evaluation. Data Management, 23(2), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W.-P. (2004). Applying Domain Knowledge and Social Information to Product Analysis and Recommendations: An Agent-Based Decision Support System. Expert Systems, 21(3), 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyard, S., Burstein, F., and Arnott, D. (2001). A Multi-Faceted Decision Support System Evaluation Approach. Journal of Decision Systems, 10(3–4), 395–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Théoret, D. (1976). Structure of ‘Unstructured’ Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, A., D. Tromp, and T. Wegner (1988) The Quantification of Decision Support Benefits Within the Context of Value Analysis. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 11(4), 515–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, M., Forgionne, G., Cervantes, F., Garrido, L., Gupta, J., and Gelman, O. (2005). Toward a Comprehensive Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Intelligent Decision-Making Support Systems (i-DMSS). Journal of Decision Systems, 14(3), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E., and E. Chan (2005). Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools Using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 29(4), 889–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Wren, G., Hahn, E., and Forgionne, G. (2004). A Multiple Criteria Framework for the Evaluation of Decision Support Systems. Omega, 32(4), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Wren, G., Mora, M., Forgionne, G., Garrido, L., and Gupta, J. (2006). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Intelligent Decision Making Support Systems. In J. Gupta, G. Forgionne, and M. Mora (Eds.), Intelligent Decision-Making Support Systems (i-DMSS): Foundations, Applications and Challenges (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Wren, G., Mora, M., Forgionne, G., and Gupta, J. (2009). An Integrative Evaluation Framework for Intelligent Decision Support Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 195, 642–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieptea, D. R., and Anderson, E. (1987). Price and Value of Decision Support Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 11(4), 515–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, J. (2008). Cognitive Elements of Human Decision Making. In G. Phillips-Wren, N. Ichalkaranje, and L. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Making: An AI-Based Approach (pp. 41–76). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerol, J.-C., and Adam, F. (2008). Understanding Human Decision Making – A Fundamental Step Towards Effective Intelligent Decision Support. In G. Phillips-Wren, N. Ichalkaranje, and L. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Making: An AI-Based Approach (pp. 3–40). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1997). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1986). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T., and Vargas, L. (1994). Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social and Technological Environments with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, R., and Guimaraes, T. (1995). Assessing the Quality of Institutional DSS. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda, R., Barr, S., and McDonnel, J. (1988). Decision Support Systems Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test. Management Science, 34(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, J., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J., Power, D., Sharda, R., and Carlsson, C. (2002). Past, Present and Future of Decision Support Technology. Decision Support Systems, 33(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B., Normoyle, A., Kannan, P., Pater, R., Chandrasekaran, D., and Bharathy, G. (2008). An Embeddable Testbed for Insurgent and Terrorist Agent Theories: InsurgiSim. Intelligent Decision Technologies Journal, 2(4), 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The New Science of Management Decision. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1987). Two Heads Are Better Than One: The Collaboration Between AI and OR. Interfaces, 17(4), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A., and Jakobson, G. (2009). Intelligent Decision Making in Dynamic Environments: Methods, Architectures and Applications. Intelligent Decision Technologies Journal, 3(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, R. (1980). A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 4(4), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., and Kantor, P. (2006). Cross-Evaluation: A New Model for Information System Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghezout, N., and Zarate’, P. (2009). Supporting a Multicriterion Decision Making and Multi-Agent Negotiation in Manufacturing Systems. Intelligent Decision Technologies Journal, 3(3), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P., and Benbasat, I. (1999). Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 356–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E., and Aronson, J. (1998). Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, J., Sioutis, C., Phillips-Wren, G., Ichalkaranje, N., Urlings, P., and Jain, L. (2008). Future Directions: Building a Decision Making Framework Using Agent Teams. In G. Phillips-Wren, N. Ichalkaranje, and L. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Making: An AI-Based Approach (pp. 387–408). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., and Forgionne, G. (2006). A Decision-Theoretic Approach to the Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems. Information Processing and Management, 24, 863–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments significantly contributed to the quality of the paper. We particularly appreciate the suggested references and the careful reading of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria Phillips-Wren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Evaluation of DSS Compared to DSS with No AI Method – The First Value Is Calculated for the DSS with IA and the Second for the DSS Without IA

Appendix: Evaluation of DSS Compared to DSS with No AI Method – The First Value Is Calculated for the DSS with IA and the Second for the DSS Without IA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips-Wren, G., Mora, M., Forgionne, G. (2011). Assessing Today: Determining the Decision Value of Decision Support Systems. In: Schuff, D., Paradice, D., Burstein, F., Power, D., Sharda, R. (eds) Decision Support. Annals of Information Systems, vol 14. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6181-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics