Skip to main content

Group-Level Evolution and Information Systems: What Can We Learn From Animal Colonies in Nature?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems Research

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 24))

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe 10 central properties and a speciation process for a certain type of real and virtual human collective that is comparable with animal colonies in nature. This theory, called colonial systems and its application to information systems-supported groups called information colonies , is based on those characteristics of mobile animal colonies that may contribute to the survivability of these formations under varied environmental circumstances. We propose that like animal colonies, human equivalents participate in group selection processes and thus have lineages. Like animal colonies, human colonies create offspring, which inherits their evolutionary history and evolutionary mechanism. We call this group-level evolutionary mechanism punctuated prototyping . In this chapter, we discuss human colonies from the following perspectives: phylogeny (evolutionary history); ontogeny (members’ lifetime histories); change; boundaries, complexity, structure, growth, goals, power, and control. We propose that the theory of human colonies provides a novel perspective on human collectives in real and virtual settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have adapted Baum and Singh (1994a) by illustrating where the colonial systems theory belongs in the hierarchy.

  2. 2.

    For a comprehensive discussion of “humanness,” see Porra (1996, 1999).

  3. 3.

    How we reconcile between gradual and radical change in the colonial systems theory is presented in detail in our previous work (Porra 1996, 1999).

  4. 4.

    In this chapter, we have used examples from these studies to illustrate some points about human colonies.

References

  • Aldrich HE (1979) Organizations and environments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey TL, Kelly D, Barnett WP (1993) Resetting the clock: the dynamics of organizational failure. Admin Sci Q 38:51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott D (2004) Decision support systems evolutions: framework, case study and research agenda. Eur J Inf Syst 13:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Xiangyang L (2006) Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Philadelphia, pp 44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC (1988) Ecological aggregates and heritable units: towards an evolutionary perspective on organizations. A paper presented at the Academy of Management national meetings, Anaheim, CA. In: Baum JAC, Singh JV (eds) (1994a) Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC (1989) A population perspective on organizations: a study of diversity and transformation in child care service organizations. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Management, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC (1990) Inertial and adaptive patterns of organizational change. Academy of Management best papers proceedings, Academy of Management, San Francisco, pp 165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC, Oliver C (1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin Sci Q 36:187–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC, Singh JV (eds) (1994a) Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JAC, Singh JV (eds) (1994b) Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary process: some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. In: Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Beklemishev WN (1969) Principles of comparative anatomy of invertebrates, In: Kabata Z (ed) Promorphology, vol 1. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL xxx + 490

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrello ME (2005) The rise, fall and resurrection of group selection. Endeavour 29(1):43–47, March

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy-making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organ Sci 2:239–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman RA, Singh JV (1987) Strategy and organization: an evolutionary approach. Paper presented in the Academy of Management meetings, New Orleans. In: Baum JAC, Singh JV (eds) (1994a) Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1974a) Downward causation in hierarchically organized biological systems. In: Ayala F, Dobzhansky T (eds) Studies in the philosophy of biology. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1974b) Evolutionary epistemology. In Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of Karl Popper. Open court Publishing, LaSalle, pp 413–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1979) Comments on the sociobiology of ethics and moralizing. Behav Sci 24:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1982) Legal and primary-group social controls. J Sociol Biol Struct 5:431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1990) Levels of organization, downward causation, and the selection-theory approach to evolutionary epistemology. In: Greenberg G, Tobach E (eds) Theories of the evolution of knowing, the T.C. Schneila conference series, Vol 4. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1994) How individual and face-to-face-group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. In: Baum JAC and Singh JV (eds) Evolutionary dynamics of organizations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll G (1984) Organizational ecology. Annu Rev Sociol 10:71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll G, Hannan MT (1989) Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: a model and five empirical tests. Admin Sci Q 34:411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang A, Duck J (2003) Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: toward new understanding of group development. Acad Manage J 48(1):106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter NA (1968) Towards a theory of teleogenic control systems. Gen Syst 13:85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter NA (1975) The self determinism of teleogenic systems. Cybernetics 5(3):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csányi V (1989) Evolutionary systems and society: a general theory. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Delacroix J, Swaminathan A (1991) Cosmetic, speculative, and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: a longitudinal study. Admin Sci Q 28:274–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N, Gould S (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper & Company, San Francisco, pp 82–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. Eur Soc Evol Biol 22:659–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick CJG (1988) Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Acad Manage J 31(1):9–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick CJG (1989) Marking time: predictable transitions in task groups. Acad Manage J 32(2):274–309, June

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick CJG (1991) Evolutionary change theories: a multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad Manage Rev 16(1):10–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg A, Buchholtz A (1990) Converting to for-profit status: corporate responsiveness to radical change. Acad Manage J 33:447–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould J (1991) Opus 200. Nat Hist 100:12–18, August

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1977) The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 32: 929–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1989) Organization ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman HA (1992) Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin Sci Q 37:48–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman HA, Russo MV, Meyer AD (2001) Organizational environments in flux: the impact of regulatory punctuations on organizational domains, CEO succession, and performance. Organ Sci 12(3):253–273, May–June

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley AH (1950) Human ecology: a theory of community structure. Ronald, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley AH (1986) Human ecology: a theoretical essay. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1988) Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertial and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change. Acad Manage J 34:591–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassila KS, Brancheau JC (1999) Adoption and utilization of commercial software packages: exploring utilization equilibria, transitions, triggers, and tracks. J Manage Inf Syst 16(2):63–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann L, Keller L, West S, Roze D (2007) Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(16):6736–6739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locker AN, Coulter A (1976) Recent progress towards a theory of teleogenesis. Kybernetes 5: 67–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden CJ, Singh JV (1990) The dynamics of organizational speciation. In: Singh JV (ed) Organizational evolution: new directions. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen K, Newman M (2008) Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model. Eur J Inf Syst 17:589–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek K (2008) Darwin 200: the needs of the many. Nature 256(7220):296–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey B (1982) Organizational systematics. Taxonomy, classification, evolution. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner AS (1991) Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs. Am Sociol Rev 56: 772–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner AS, Amburgey TL, Stearns TM (1990) Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: buffering and transformational shields. Admin Sci Q 35:689–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (1999) Dangerous decisions. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman R, Sheldon KM, Wilson DS (2008) For the good of the group? Exploring group-level evolutionary adaptations using multilevel selection theory. Group Dyn 12(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen GA, Waller MJ (2002) Focusing on midpoint transitions: an analysis of boundary conditions. Acad Manage J 45(5):1056–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagels HR (1989) The dreams of reason—the computer and the rise of the sciences of complexity, Bantam edn. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palla G, Barabási A-L, Vicsek T (2007) Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446(5):664–667, April

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks MS, Steinberg E (1978) Dichotic property and teleogenesis. Kybernetes 7:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porra J (1996) Colonial systems, information colonies and punctuated prototyping, Jyvaskyla studies of computer science, economics and statistics, vol 33. University of Jyvaskyla Press, Jyvaskyla

    Google Scholar 

  • Porra J (1999) Colonial systems. Inf Syst Res 10(1):38–69, March

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porra J, Parks MS (2006) Sustaining virtual communities: suggestions from the colonial model. Inf Syst e-Bus Manage 4:309–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porra J, Hirschheim R, Parks MS (2005) The history of Texaco’s Corporate IT Function―A general systems theoretical interpretation. Manage Inf Syst Q 29(4 I):721746, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Porra J, Parks MS, Day J, Junglas I (2009) Organizational survival from colonial speciation during Katrina – What temporary organizations and ad hoc information systems can do to aid rescue, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder R, St. John CH (1996) Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Acad Manage Rev 21(4):1192–1225, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: an empirical test. Acad Manage J 37(5):1141–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabherval R, Hirschheim R, Goles T (2001) The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organ Sci 12(2):179–197, March–April

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuring I (2009) Evolution of generous cooperative norms by cultural group selection. J Theor Biol 257(3):397–407, April

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JH (1999) Sudden origins—fossils, genes, and the emergence of species. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit A (2004) Shifting values partly explain the debate over group selection. Stud Hist Philos Biol Sci 35(4):697–720, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit A (2005) The notion of ‘group’ and tests of group selection. Philos Sci 72:1052–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva L, Hirschheim R (2007) Fighting against windmills: strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. Manage Inf Syst Q 31(2):327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JV, Lumsden CJ (1990) Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annu Rev Sociol 16:161–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh JV, House RJ, Tucker DJ (1986) Organizational change and organizational mortality. Admin Sci Q 31:587–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (2000) “Was Hayek right about group selection after all?” Review essay of unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Rev Austrian Econ 13(1):81–95, February

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street CT, Meister DB (2004) Small business growth and internal transparency: the role of information systems. Manage Inf Syst Q 28(3):473–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich D, McKelvey B (1990) General organizational classification: an empirical test using the United States and Japanese electronic industries. Organ Sci 1:99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):510–540, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veelen M (2009) Group selection, kin selection, altruism and cooperation: when inclusive fitness is right and when it can be wrong. J Theor Biol 259(3):589–600, August

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Veelen M, Hopfensitz M (2007) In love and war: altruism, norm formation, and two different types of group selection. J Theor Biol 249(4):667–680, December

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins J (2007) The dimensions, modes and definitions of species and speciation. Biol Philos 22:247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1980) Sociobiology—the abridged edition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1992) The effects of complex social life on evolution and biodiversity, vol 63. OIKOS, Copenhagen, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (2008) One giant leap: how insects achieved altruism and colonial life. Bioscience, 58(1):17–25, January

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Wilson EO (2007) Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Q Rev Biol 82(4):327–348, December

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Wilson EO (2008) Evolution “for the good of the group”. Am Sci 96(5):378–389, September/October

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This chapter is based on an article by the author, published in 1999 in volume 10, issue 1 of the Information Systems Research journal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaana Porra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Porra, J. (2010). Group-Level Evolution and Information Systems: What Can We Learn From Animal Colonies in Nature?. In: Kock, N. (eds) Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems Research. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 24. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6138-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6139-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics