Skip to main content

Portfolio Theory: The Contribution of Markowitz’s Theory to Information System Area

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Theory

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 28))

Abstract

Portfolio theory is concerned with risk and return. However, assigning weight to the risk at least equal to the yield was the big news in the 1950s. Until then, both in academia and for the general public, the stock market was no more than a playground for speculators. So in 1952, Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz, then a young doctoral student in operations research at the University of Chicago, demonstrated mathematically, for the first time, why putting all your eggs in one basket is an unacceptable risk strategy, and that diversification is the best deal for an investor or a manager of a company. In Markowitz’s analysis, the expected return and risk of several portfolios were quantified. Therefore, portfolio theory is about maximizing the benefits of investments considering risk and return. In the area of Information Systems (IS) portfolio theory has influenced two major streams ­regarding Information Technology Portfolio Management (ITPM): (a) analysis and classification of IT investments in different dimensions and (b) analysis and classification of IT projects. Both lines of research use Markowitz’s studies as reference to evaluate the trade-off between risk and return on investments in IT projects at the organizational level of analysis. Thus, IT investments can be managed as a ­portfolio, combining risk and return to maximize the benefits of IT investment, and help ­managers to choose the best option and make the best decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ATM:

Automatic teller machines

CAPM:

Capital asset pricing model

E:

Expected return

IS:

Information systems

IT:

Information technology

ITPM:

Information technology portfolio management

ROT:

Real options theory

TCO:

Total cost of ownership

V:

Variance of return

References

  • Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2004). IT assets, organizational capabilities and firm performance: Asset and capability specific complementarities. Center for IS Research. Working Paper 343, August, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18(5), 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, N. P., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, B. A., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (2005). A framework for information technology outsourcing risk management. The DATA BASE for advances in information systems, 36(4), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I., Sougstad, R., & Sougstad, R. (2004). Prioritizing a portfolio of information technology investment projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(2), 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benaroch, M., Lichtenstein, Y., & Robison, K. (2006). Real options in IT risk management: An empirical validation of risk–option relationships. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 827–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. L. (2005). Capital ideas: The improbable origins of modern wall street. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. L. (2007). Capital ideas evolving. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielinski, B. M., Ho, T. S., O’Hanlon, J. F., & Whiddett, R. J. (1993). Portfolio theory applied to on-line financial information: A computer-based graphical approach. Accounting Education, 2(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, M., & Weill, P. (1997). Management by maxim: How business and IT managers can create IT infrastructures. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & Neo, B. S. (1999). Strategic context and patterns of infrastructure capability. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(2), 157–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & St. Clair, D. (1999). The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, B. IT. (2005). Portfolio management: Implications for IT strategic alignment. In Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Omaha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1997). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders II. Research Technology Management, 40(6), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, S., Shi, C., & Gurbaxani, V. (2007). Investigating the risk–return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science, 53(12), 1829–1842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolci, P. C. (2009). Uso da Gestão do Portfólio de TI no processo de gerenciamento e justificativa dos investimentos em Tecnologia da Informação. Master´s thesis, School of Management, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolci, P. C., Maçada, A. C. G., & Becker, J. L. (2010). IT investment management using the real options and portfolio management approaches. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., Du, H. S., Wang, S., Chen, K., & Deng, X. (2004). A framework of web-based Decision support systems for portfolio selection with OLAP and PVM. Decision Support Systems, 37(3), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastham, R. A., & Skitmore, M. (1993). Construction contractor’s project selection: Decision making within a portfolio framework. In Proceedings International Seminar on Optimum Systems for Construction Management (ISOSCM), Heilongjiang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elonen, S., & Artto, K. (2003). A problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi, F. J., Gupta, F., & Markowitz, H. M. (2002). The legacy of modern portfolio theory. Journal of Investing, 11(3), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, M., & Leliveld, I. (2004). Best practices in IT portfolio management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(31), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karhade, P. P., & Shaw, M. J. (2007). Rejection and selection decisions in the IT portfolio composition process: An enterprise risk management based perspective. In Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Keystone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R., & Sougstad, R. (2008). Risk management of contract portfolios in IT services: The profit-at-risk approach. Journal of Management Information Systems., 25(1), 17–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Ajjan, H., & Niu, Y. (2008). Information technology portfolio management: Literature review, framework, and research issues. Information Resource Management Journal, 21(3), 64–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C., Jr. (1973). A descriptive model of information systems in the context of the organization. Proceeding of the Wharton Conference on Research on Computers in Organization, 5(2), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maizlish, B., & Handler, R. (2005). IT portfolio management step-by-step: Unlocking the business value of IT. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio: Selection, efficient diversification of investment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1976). Markowitz revisited. Financial Analysts Journal, 32(5), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1991). Foundations of portfolio theory. The Journal of Finance, XLVI(2), 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlan, W. F. (1981). Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirani, R., & Lederer, A. L. (1998). An instrument for assessing the organizational benefits of IS projects. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 803–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, V. S., & Mannino, M. V. (2000). Mean-risk trade-offs in inductive expert systems. Information Systems Research, 11(2), 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, R. O., & Laurindo, F. J. B. (2003). Um estudo de caso de gestão de portfólio de projetos de tecnologia da informação. Gestão e Produção, 10(3), 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun, J. (2006). Real options. Tools and techniques for valuing strategic investment and decisions. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. J., & Verhoef, C. (2008). Quantifying the yield of risk-bearing IT-portfolios. Science of Computer Programming, 71(1), 17–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. A. (2007). Theoretical framework for information systems portfolio management. In Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Keystone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyck, B., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S. R., Moura, M., & Sloper, A. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(7), 524–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, J. T., & Torre, N. (1999). Information systems for optimal transaction implementation source. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, M. (2002). Markowitz’s “portfolio selection”: A fifty-year retrospective. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 1041–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjeev Dewan, S., & Ren, F. (2007). Risk and return of information technology initiatives: Evidence from electronic commerce announcements. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 370–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schniederjans, M. J., Hamaker, J. L., & Schniederjans, A. M. (2004). Information technology investment: Decision-making methodology. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, R. P., & Chen, H. (2008). Evaluating a news-aware quantitative trader: The effect of momentum and contrarian stock selection strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. A. (2008). A framework for the life cycle management of information technology projects: ProjectIT. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Lucas, H. C. (1985). Developing strategic information Systems. In W. Guth (Ed.), Handbook of business strategy. Boston: Gorham e Lamont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, C. (2002). Quantitative IT portfolio management. Science of Computer Programming, 45(1), 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrmann, A., Heinrich, B., & Seifert, F. (2006). Quantitatives IT-portfoliomanagement: Risiken von IT-investitionen wertorientiert steuern. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 48(4), 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Aral, S. (2006). Generating premium returns on your IT investments. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Olson, M. (1989). Managing investment in information technology: Mini case examples and implications. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., & Ong, C. (2008). Management of information technology investment: A framework based on a real options and mean–variance theory perspective. Technovation, 28(3), 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge support from the Brazilian agencies CAPES and CNPq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Cunha Dolci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dolci, P.C., Maçada, A.C.G. (2012). Portfolio Theory: The Contribution of Markowitz’s Theory to Information System Area. In: Dwivedi, Y., Wade, M., Schneberger, S. (eds) Information Systems Theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics