Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group Cognition as a Foundation for the New Science of Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Science of Learning

Abstract

In the new global world, it is time to recognize that knowledge is primarily produced socially and progressively, not just by spontaneous acts of isolated minds. Individuals participate in this as knowledge learners, knowledge users and knowledge builders, predominantly through their interactions in small groups. The cognitive work of small groups can be distinct from individual thinking and community knowledge processing.

We need a new science of group learning to complement our sciences of individual learning and community knowledge building. In particular, we need a science that will help us to realize the potential of computer networking to foster the formation of virtual groups and computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL).

The construct of group cognition provides a theoretical and practical foundation for developing the needed science, for analyzing the work of small groups and for designing effective collaboration software. The Virtual Math Teams (VMT) Project provides a model of such scientific research. Along with related explorations of group processes, it has already started to produce concrete analyses of group cognition and to develop a multi-faceted online educational environment.

A science of group cognition can systematically provide findings that are objective, reliable and generalizable through its interpretive case studies. With its focus on the group as the unit of description, group cognition joins other post-cognitive theories, which extend the analysis of cognition beyond the psychological individual. As the pivotal middle ground in which knowledge is primordially co-constructed, the group provides a foundation for sciences of learning at the individual, small group and community levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1972/1995). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 115–149. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9061-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, H. (1996). It takes a village: And other lessons children teach us. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Abram, P. L., Scarloss, B. A., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1045–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers cannot do. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Kosultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1960/1988). Truth and method. New York: Crossroads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984a). Elements of the theory of structuration. The constitution of society (pp. 1–40). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984b). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In C. Goodwin & A. Duranti (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others (pp. 1–11). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1967). Phenomenology of spirit (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation of human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1917/1991). On the phenomenology of internal time (1893–1917) (J. Brough, Trans.). Dodrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. Available at http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/c-merkel/document4.HTM

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., & Stahl, G. (2009 of Conference). Symposium: Examining practices of computer-mediated learning. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2009), Rhodes, Greece. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2009koschmann.pdf

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gesture, knowledge and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1995). An anthropology of reading. Bloomington: IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital (B. Fowkes, Trans. Vol. I). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11. Available at http://www.aera.net/pubs/er/pdf/vol33_02/2026-02_pp03-11.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (1999). Is “Exploratory talk” Productive talk? In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 79–101). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2002). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans. 2 ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlpfordt, M., & Stahl, G. (2007). The integration of synchronous communication across dual interaction spaces. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The proceedings of CSCL 2007: Of mice, minds, and society (CSCL 2007). New Brunswick, NJ. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/martin.pdf

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1962/1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, J. (2007). Bridging: Interactional mechanisms used by online groups to sustain knowledge building over time. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘07), New Brunswick, NJ. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/johann.pdf

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/papers/ch01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2004a). Mediation of group cognition. SigGroup Bulletin, 24(4), 13–17. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/publications/journals/Mediation%20of%20Group%20Cognition.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2004b). Thinking at the group unit of analysis. Paper presented at the CSCL SIG Symposium of the European Union Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence (KAL ‘04), Lausanne, Switzerland. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/kal2004.pdf & http://GerryStahl.net/pub/kal2004ppt.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition: The collaborative locus of agency in CSCL. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘05), Taipei, Taiwan. Proceedings, pp. 632–640. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2005.pdf & http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2005ppt.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/mit/

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘07), New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl07.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2008). Integrating a wiki into support for group cognition. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, the Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008wiki.pdf

  • Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmt/book

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., & Herrmann, T. (1999). Intertwining perspectives and negotiation. Paper presented at the ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group ‘99), Phoenix, AZ. Proceedings pp. 316–324. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/papers/ch07.pdf

  • Strijbos, J. W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small group chat communication. Learning & Instruction. Special Issue on Measurement Challenges in Collaborative Learning Research, 17(4), 394–404. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/jw.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation of design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, N., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2008). Questioning and responding in online small groups engaged in collaborative math problem solving. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008nan.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Science & Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Gerry Stahl

Authors
  1. Gerry Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry Stahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, POBox 1266, Utd.Arab.Emir.

    Myint Swe Khine

  2. Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, PO Box 126, Utd.Arab.Emir.

    Issa M. Saleh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahl, G. (2010). Group Cognition as a Foundation for the New Science of Learning. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) New Science of Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation