Skip to main content

Auditory Temporal Integration at Threshold: Evidence of a Cortical Origin

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception
  • 1296 Accesses

Abstract

A reanalysis of a previous study of wave N100m of the auditory evoked field (AEF) shows that the level dependence of the response amplitude is, near the perceptual threshold, consistent with a model recently developed for the compound action potential of the auditory nerve. The response latency, decremented by a constant transmission delay, is about inversely proportional to the response amplitude. This result, although valid only for very low stimulus levels, supports the view that the considerable increase of the N100m latency with decreasing stimulus level arises, at least in part, from temporal integration. To allow conclusions as to where the temporal integration takes place, first results of a new experiment are presented, in which the auditory evoked potential elicited by a series of eight near-threshold tone-pulses was recorded. Neither wave V of the auditory brainstem response nor the middle-latency response component Pa differed between first and last pulse of the series, suggesting that temporal integration occurs more centrally than primary auditory cortex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Forss N, Mäkelä JP, McEvoy L, Hari R (1993) Temporal integration and oscillatory responses of the human auditory cortex revealed by evoked magnetic fields to click trains. Hear Res 68:89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gage NM, Roberts TP (2000) Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field. Neuroreport 11:2723–2726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gage N, Roberts TP, Hickok G (2006) Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component. Brain Res 1069:166–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heil P, Neubauer H (2004) Auditory thresholds re-visited. In: Pressnitzer D, de Cheveigné A, McAdams S, Collet L (eds) Auditory signal processing: psychophysics, physiology and modeling. Springer, New York, pp 454–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Joutsiniemi SL, Hari R, Vilkman V (1989) Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations. Audiology 28:325–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B (2008) Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9:102–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B, Klein JS (2007) Auditory evoked field at threshold. Hear Res 228:188–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B, Seither-Preisler A (2008) Auditory brainstem response at the detection limit. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9:521–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B, Krumbholz K, Lammertmann C, Seither-Preisler A, Steinsträter O, Patterson RD (2003) Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 18:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkenhöner B, Klein JS, Seither-Preisler A (2007) Near-threshold auditory evoked fields and potentials are in line with the Weber-Fechner law. In: Kollmeier B, Klump G, Hohmann V, Langemann U, Mauermann M, Uppenkamp S, Verhey J (eds) Hearing - from sensory processing to perception. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–225

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä JP (2007) Magnetoencephalography. Auditory evoked fields. In: Burkard RF, Eggermont JJ, Don M (eds) Auditory evoked potentials. Basic principles and clinical applications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 525–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell IJ, Nilsen KE (1997) The location of the cochlear amplifier: spatial representation of a single tone on the guinea pig basilar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:2660–2664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yates GK, Winter IM, Robertson D (1990) Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range. Hear Res 45:203–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwislocki J (1965) Analysis of some auditory characteristics. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E (eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol III. Wiley, New York, pp 1–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Lütkenhöner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lütkenhöner, B. (2010). Auditory Temporal Integration at Threshold: Evidence of a Cortical Origin. In: Lopez-Poveda, E., Palmer, A., Meddis, R. (eds) The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5686-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics