Skip to main content

Adaptation to Context as Core Component of Self-Regulated Learning: The Example of Complexity and Epistemic Beliefs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 28))

Abstract

In this chapter we raise two important issues regarding the metacognitive self-regulation of learning with technologies: First, adaptation to the external context is a core component of self-regulated learning. Empirical research regarding task complexity and text complexity – two exemplary external conditions – shows that learners systematically adapt their whole self-regulated learning process within a hypermedia learning environment to these contextual conditions. Therefore, careful construction and evaluation of learning tasks and learning content is warranted. In this context communicating and teaching the demands of complex learning scenarios deserves special attention. Second, learner characteristics play an important role in self-regulated learning and adaptation. Empirical research regarding epistemic beliefs – one exemplary learner characteristic – shows that learners with absolutistic beliefs will plan and execute different learning processes than those with sophisticated beliefs; these differences are especially pronounced under conditions of high complexity. Given the general superiority of the learning and adaptation processes of more sophisticated learners such beliefs should be a learning goal of their own and should be explicitly addressed in learning scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomé, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. (2005). Thinking and knowing about knowledge: A plea for and critical remarks on psychological research programs on epistemological beliefs. In M. Hoffman, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign - Grounding mathematics education (pp. 191–201). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Stahl, E. (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 423–444). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Episte-mological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learn­ing, 5(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J. (2006). Orienting tasks and their impact on learning and attitudes in the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson-Noel, D., & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students’ studying and achievement. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(3/4), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of ­epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, I., Schulz von Thun, F., & Tausch, R. (1990). Sich verständlich ausdrücken - Anleitungstexte, Unterri­chtstexte, Vertragstexte, Amtstexte, Versicherungstexte, Wissenschaftstexte, u.a. [To express oneself comprehensible—instructional texts, bureaucratic texts, etc.] (4th ed.). München: Ernst Reinhard, GmbH & Co, Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruc­tion, 16(5), 492–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEneaney, J. E. (2001). Graphic and numerical methods to assess navigation in hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 761–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (2003). MetaLinks: Authoring and affordances for conceptual and narrative flow in adaptive hyperbooks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 199–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S. (2008). To calibrate or not to calibrate? Conditions and processes of metacognitive calibration during hypermedia learning. URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:6–14569461694. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6–14569461694. Accessed on 10 June 2011.

  • Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration - an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Bromme, R., Porsch, T., & Stahl, E. (2008). Epistemological sensitisation causes deeper elaboration during self-regulated learning. International perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ting a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth Inter­national Conference for the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2008 (Vol. 2, pp. 213–220). London: Lulu Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., Murray, T., & Bromme, R. (2012). Is adaptation to task complexity really beneficial for performance? Learning and Instruction, 22, 281–289. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1988). Delusions about performance on multiple-choice comprehension tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Naumann, J., & Noller, S. (2003). LOGPAT: A semi-automatic way to analyze hypertext navigation behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Canas, J. (2006). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1157–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 773–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallmann, F. (2007). The influence of epistemological beliefs and academic self-concept on metacognitive calibration in German 12th graders. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraints. Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M., & Elshout, J. J. (1999). Changes in the relationship between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. A., & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. R. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), New directions in measures and methods (pp. 121–155). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Pieschl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., Bromme, R. (2013). Adaptation to Context as Core Component of Self-Regulated Learning: The Example of Complexity and Epistemic Beliefs. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics