Skip to main content

Ethical Discussions in Approaching Fertility Preservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fertility Preservation

Abstract

Cancer survivors may wish to become parents, if they have lost their reproductive function, by using previously stored gametes or gonadal tissue. Fertility preservation serves such a wide range of medico-social circumstances, some quite unique, that patient care requires an individualized and multidisciplinary approach. In particular, fertility specialists offering fertility preservation options to cancer patients should be properly trained and knowledgeable to discuss patient’s treatment plan, prognosis, as well as unusual health risks for future offspring and the potential harmful effects of pregnancy. Overall, there should be no ethical objections to offer these services since they are offered with the scope of preserving future fertility. However, in practice, there are objections: many options are still experimental; posthumous use of stored tissue or gametes carries some legal issues; concerns exist about the welfare of offspring resulting from an expected shortened life span of the parent; concerns exist about the welfare of children born using gametes frozen after chemotherapy already started; and reseeding of cancer is possible after transplanting cryopreserved tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gosden RG. Fertility preservation-definition, history and prospect. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27(6):433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, (http://seer.cancer.gov)

  3. Bromer JG, Patrizio P. Gynecologic management of fertility. In: Wingard JR, Gastineau D, Leather H, Snyder EL, Szczepiorkowski ZM, editors. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a clinician’s handbook. Bethesda, MD: AABB Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrizio P, Butt S, Caplan A. Ovarian tissue preservation and future fertility: emerging technologies and ethical considerations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;34:107–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirtz DG, Fitzsimmons LG. Regulatory and ethical issues in the conduct of clinical research involving children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002;14:669–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy R, Larcher V, Gosden RG, Hewitt M, Leiper A, Spoudeas HA, et al. Fertility preservation for ­children treated for cancer (2): ethics of consent for gamete storage and experimentation. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84:360–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grundy R, Larcher V, Gosden RG, Hewitt M, Leiper A, Spoudeas HA, et al. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (1): scientific advances and research dilemmas. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84:355–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahadur G. Ethics of testicular stem cells medicine. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2702–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chian RC, Huang JY, Tan SL, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:608–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(6):769–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutcliffe AG, Dsouza SW, Cadman J, et al. Minor congenital anomalies, major congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3332–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wennerholm UB, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Bergh C, Aittomaki K, Hazekamp J, Nygren KG, et al. Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2158–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ­ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004;364(9443):1405–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meirow D, Levron J, Eldar-Geva T, et al. Pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a patient with ovarian failure after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(3):318–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Demeestere I, Simon P, Emiliani S, Delbaere A, Englert Y. Fertility preservation: successful transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue in a young patient previously treated for Hodgkin’s disease. Oncologist. 2007;12(12):1437–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersen CY, Rosendahl M, Byskov AG, et al. Two successful pregnancies following autotransplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez-Serrano M, Crespo J, Mirabet V, et al. Twins born after transplantation of ovarian cortical tissue and oocyte vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:268.e11–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Silber SJ, DeRosa M, Pineda J, Lenahan K, Grenia D, Gorman K, et al. A series of monozygotic twins discordant for ovarian failure: ovary transplantation (cortical versus microvascular) and cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1531–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ernst E, Bergholdt S, Jørgensen JS, Andersen CY. The first woman to give birth to two children following transplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1280–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roux C, Amiot C, Agnani G, Aubard Y, Rohrlich PS, Piver P. Live birth after ovarian tissue autograft in a patient with sickle cell disease treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2413.e15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silber SJ, Grudzinskas G, Gosden RG. Successful pregnancy after microsurgical transplantation of an intact ovary. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2617–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robertson JA. Procreative liberty, harm to offspring, and assisted reproduction. Am J Law Med. 2004;30:7–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasquale Patrizio MD, MBE, HCLD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patrizio, P. (2012). Ethical Discussions in Approaching Fertility Preservation. In: Seli, E., Agarwal, A. (eds) Fertility Preservation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1783-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1783-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1782-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1783-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics