Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Interventional Pain Management

  • 4922 Accesses

Abstract

Continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) catheters, also known as “perineural” ­catheters, extend the potential duration of anesthesia and analgesia provided by peripheral nerve block techniques. In the ambulatory setting, the use of CPNB has been shown to increase the quality of pain control experienced by patients at home as well as reduce the incidence of side effects produced by conventional opioid analgesics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1297–1304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, Enneking FK. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:959–965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, Chidgey LK, Enneking FK. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1089–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singelyn FJ, Deyaert M, Joris D, Pendeville E, Gouverneur JM. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous three-in-one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:88–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganapathy S, Wasserman RA, Watson JT, et al. Modified continuous femoral three-in-one block for postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1197–1202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ilfeld BM, Ball ST, Gearen PF, et al. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks after hip arthroplasty: a dual-center, randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:491–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ilfeld BM, Le LT, Meyer RS, et al. Ambulatory continuous femoral nerve blocks decrease time to discharge readiness after tricompartment total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:703–713.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilfeld BM, Wright TW, Enneking FK, Morey TE. Joint range of motion after total shoulder arthroplasty with and without a continuous interscalene nerve block: a retrospective, case-control study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:429–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, et al. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:999–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilfeld BM, Wright TW, Enneking FK, Vandenborne K. Total elbow arthroplasty as an outpatient procedure using a continuous infraclavicular nerve block at home: a prospective case report. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:172–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ilfeld BM, Gearen PF, Enneking FK, et al. Total hip arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using an ambulatory continuous psoas compartment nerve block: a prospective feasibility study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:113–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilfeld BM, Gearen PF, Enneking FK, et al. Total knee arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using continuous femoral nerve blocks at home: a prospective feasibility study. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ilfeld BM, Mariano ER, Williams BA, Woodard JN, Macario A. Hospitalization costs of total knee arthroplasty with a continuous femoral nerve block provided only in the hospital versus on an ambulatory basis: a retrospective, case-control, cost-minimization analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:46–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant SA, Nielsen KC, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, Klein SM. Continuous peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:209–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boezaart AP, De Beer JF, Nell ML. Early experience with continuous cervical paravertebral block using a stimulating catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:406–413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pham-Dang C, Kick O, Collet T, Gouin F, Pinaud M. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks with stimulating catheters. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:83–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandhu NS, Capan LM. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:254–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, et al. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1688–1694.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mariano ER, Cheng GS, Choy LP, et al. Electrical stimulation versus ultrasound guidance for popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:480–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Bellars RH, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus electrical stimulation for infraclavicular brachial plexus perineural catheter insertion. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1211–1218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus electrical stimulation for femoral perineural catheter insertion. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1453–1460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swenson JD, Bay N, Loose E, et al. Outpatient management of continuous peripheral nerve catheters placed using ultrasound guidance: an experience in 620 patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1436–1443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dhir S, Ganapathy S. Use of ultrasound guidance and contrast enhancement: a study of ­continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:338–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J. Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:64–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Ilfeld BM. Interscalene perineural catheter placement using an ­ultrasound-guided posterior approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:60–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fredrickson MJ, Danesh-Clough TK. Ambulatory continuous femoral analgesia for major knee surgery: a randomised study of ultrasound-guided femoral catheter placement. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:758–766.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L. Long-axis ultrasound imaging of the nerves and advancement of perineural catheters under direct vision: a preliminary report of four cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:477–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Geffen GJ, Gielen M. Ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters in children: a descriptive study. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:328–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Luyet C, Eichenberger U, Greif R, Vogt A, Szucs Farkas Z, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:534–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gucev G, Yasui GM, Chang TY, Lee J. Bilateral ultrasound-guided continuous ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block for pain relief after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1220–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW, et al. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part I: understanding the basic principles of ultrasound physics and machine operations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:412–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gray AT. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:368–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dhir S, Ganapathy S. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block with stimulating catheter and traditional technique: a prospective-randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:1158–1166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ, Stewart AW, Short TG. A prospective randomized ­comparison of ultrasound and neurostimulation as needle end points for interscalene catheter placement. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1695–1700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsui BC, Ozelsel TJ. Ultrasound-guided anterior sciatic nerve block using a longitudinal approach: “expanding the view”. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:275–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hebl JR, Neal JM. Infectious complications: a new practice advisory. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:289–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mariano ER, Ilfeld BM, Cheng GS, Nicodemus HF, Suresh S. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block catheters for pain control on pediatric medical missions in developing countries. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:598–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. A prospective randomized comparison of ultrasound guidance versus neurostimulation for interscalene catheter placement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:590–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Davis JJ, Swenson JD, Greis PE, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ. Interscalene block for postoperative analgesia using only ultrasound guidance: the outcome in 200 patients. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:272–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Swenson JD, Davis JJ, DeCou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1015–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sandhu NS, Maharlouei B, Patel B, Erkulwater E, Medabalmi P. Simultaneous bilateral infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks with low-dose lidocaine using ultrasound guidance. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:199–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Desgagnes MC, Levesque S, Dion N, et al. A comparison of a single or triple injection technique for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:668–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ilfeld BM, Le LT, Ramjohn J, et al. The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:345–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nader A, Malik K, Kendall MC, Benzon H, McCarthy RJ. Relationship between ultrasound imaging and eliciting motor response during femoral nerve stimulation. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:345–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chan VW, Nova H, Abbas S, McCartney CJ, Perlas A, Xu DQ. Ultrasound examination and localization of the sciatic nerve: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:309–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karmakar MK, Kwok WH, Ho AM, Tsang K, Chui PT, Gin T. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block: description of a new approach at the subgluteal space. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:390–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Taboada M, Rodriguez J, Valino C, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between the popliteal and subgluteal approaches for continuous sciatic nerve block with stimulating catheters. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:244–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Singson R, Santos AC, Thys DM. A comparison of intertendinous and classical approaches to popliteal nerve block using magnetic resonance imaging simulation. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1321–1324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Gerancher JC, et al. The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:701–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Shibata Y, Sato Y, Fujiwara Y, Komatsu T. Transversus abdominis plane block. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tran TM, Ivanusic JJ, Hebbard P, Barrington MJ. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:123–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic ­analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:763–767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:186–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. McDonnell JG, O’Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:193–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3801 Miranda Avenue (112A), Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA

    Edward R. Mariano

Authors
  1. Edward R. Mariano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian M. Ilfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward R. Mariano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Center for Pain Medicine, Cuyahoga Falls, 44223, Ohio, USA

    Samer N. Narouze

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mariano, E.R., Ilfeld, B.M. (2011). Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks. In: Narouze, S. (eds) Atlas of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Interventional Pain Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1681-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1681-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1679-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1681-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation