Skip to main content

The Political Disposition of Self as a Kind of Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Persons: Understanding Psychological Selfhood and Agency

Abstract

Since the seventeenth century, political theorists have been divided by two competing ontological commitments. On one side, political legitimacy is understood to issue from the separateness and independent agency of individuals. Under this construal, individuals constitute the most fundamental level of social and political analysis. The self is conceived as a rational being capable of fashioning itself and shaping its existence through autonomous acts of reflection. Societies and cultures are aggregates of individuals competitively or cooperatively pursuing their self-determined ends. The politics of individuality, as it has found expression in varieties of liberalism and libertarianism, is concerned largely with assuring the freedom in which individuals can exercise choice over their beliefs, values, and actions, and do so unencumbered by obligations not of their own choosing. To this end, adherents typically advocate for individual rights, limits on the authority of government, and the equality of all persons before the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, some theorists, such as Dworkin (1977), emphasize rights as “trumps” that individuals hold against state power, while others, such as Nozick (1974), assert that market mechanisms and property rights can be used to prevent intrusion by the state.

  2. 2.

    See Mulhall and Swift (1996) and Avineri and De-Shalit (1992) for overviews of the debates between communitarians and liberals and works of the major contributors.

  3. 3.

    It is important to emphasize that the kind of understanding advocated here goes well beyond instrumental rationality to include a deep appreciation and critical consideration of a plurality of perspectives that illuminate focal concerns.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Martin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, J., Sugarman, J.H., Hickinbottom, S. (2010). The Political Disposition of Self as a Kind of Understanding. In: Persons: Understanding Psychological Selfhood and Agency. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1065-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics