Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 2))

Abstract

The first few years of formal schooling focus on teaching children how to read and write. In this chapter, we explore what children may learn about written language prior to receiving formal instruction. Specifically, we review evidence suggesting that children acquire information about the surface and deeper features of language through informal interactions with their parents and other adults. For example, children learn about the surface features of language (the general features of print, as well as features of words and letters) through exposure to print in their environment and through activities such as learning about the alphabet. Children may also begin to learn about the deeper features of print (how writing symbolizes language) through interactions with their parents that suggest that written language is in some ways similar to spoken language. The research findings suggest that children learn a good deal about written language prior to instruction in school but that their knowledge may be restricted to elements of the language that are particularly salient to them, such as their own names. Recognizing the role that these experiences play in shaping young children’s knowledge of written language offers new avenues of research, as well as suggestions for how to improve formal education in reading and writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aram, D. (2006). Early literacy interventions: the relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activities, and their combination. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(5), 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aram, D., & Biron, S. (2004). Joint storybook reading and joint writing interventions among low SES preschoolers: differential contributions to early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 588–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2002). Mother-child joint writing and storybook reading: relation with literacy among low SES kindergartners. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48, 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apperly, I. A., Williams, E., & Williams, J. (2004). Three- to four-year-olds’ recognition that symbols have a stable meaning: pictures are understood before written words. Child Development, 75, 1510–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (1991). Letters, sounds, and symbols: changes in children’s understanding of written language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (1992). Symbolic representation of letters and numbers. Cognitive Development, 7, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (2000). Symbolic representation across domains in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2003). Notation to symbol: development in children’s understanding of print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., Shenfield, T., & Codd, J. (2000). Languages, scripts, and the environment: factors in developing concepts of print. Developmental Psychology, 36, 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children’s naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1997). Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words. Journal of Child Language, 24, 511–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., Massey, C., Machado, S. F., & Gelman, R. (1996). Young children’s plans differ for writing and drawing. Cognitive Development, 11, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2005). What children are looking at during shared storybook reading: evidence from eye movement monitoring. Psychological Science, 16, 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. New York: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganopole, S. J. (1987). The development of word consciousness prior to first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children’s early naming. Cognition, 66, B35–B47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. J., & Jacobson, M. D. (1972). Basic elementary reading vocabulary. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, B. D., & Olson, D. R. (1999). The role of literacy in children’s concept of word. Written Language and Literacy, 2, 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, L. O. (1977). Differentiation of letterlike forms in prereading children. Developmental Psychology, 13, 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Aram, D. (2004). Children’s names contribute to early literacy: a linguistic and a social perspective. In D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development (pp. 219–239). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Both-De Vries, A., Aram, D., & Bus, A. (2005). Writing starts with own name writing: from scribbling to conventional spelling in Israeli and Dutch children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Bus, A. (2003). How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children’s products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Korat, O. (1993). Sensitivity to phonological, morphological, and semantic cues in early reading and writing in Hebrew. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Shatil-Carmon, S., & Asif-Rave, O. (2006). Learning of letter names and sounds and their contribution to word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Tolchinksy Landsmann, L. (1989). Becoming literate: referential and phonetic strategies in early reading and writing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A., Gong, Z., Hessels, S., Evans, M. A., & Jared, D. (2006). Understanding print: early development and the contributions of home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., & TornĂ©us, M. (1978). Nonreaders’ awareness of the basic relationship between spoken and written words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masonheimer, P. E., Drum, P. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molfese, V. J., Beswick, J., Molnar, A., & Jacobi-Bessels, J. (2006). Alphabetic skills in preschool: a preliminary study of letter naming and letter writing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, C. (1985). Figure, parole, numeri: un problema di simbolizzazione. [Pictures, words, numbers: a problem of symbolization]. EtĂ  Evolutiva, 22, 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, S. & Treiman, R. (2009). Talking about writing: What we can learn from conversations between parents and their young children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: what do we know about how to do it? In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), Science of reading: a handbook (pp. 501–520). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. (1985). Children’s emergent reading of favorite storybooks: a developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. (1996). Roles of oral and written language as children approach conventional literacy. In C. Pontecorvo, M. Orsolini, B. Burge & L. B. Resnick (Eds.), Children’s early text construction (pp. 25–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Broderick, V. (1998). What’s in a name: children’s knowledge about the letters in their own names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Cohen, J., Mulqueeny, K., Kessler, B., & Schechtman, S. (2007). Young children’s knowledge about printed names. Child Development, 78, 1458–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: evidence from U.S. and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Levin, I., & Kessler, B. (2007). Learning of letter names follows similar principles across languages: evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaume, S. K., & Wilson, L. C. (1989). Preschool children’s explorations of letters in their own names. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, J. G., Sullivan, A., & Justice, L. M. (2003). That’s my letter!: what preschoolers’ name writing tells us about emergent literacy knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, P. E., & Boettcher, W. (1990). Young children’s acquisition of alphabet knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata, K. (2007). Differential emergence of representational systems: drawings, letters, and numerals. Cognitive Development, 22, 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Work of this chapter was supported in part by NIH grant HD051610.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Treiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robins, S., Treiman, R. (2010). Learning About Writing Begins Informally. In: Aram, D., Korat, O. (eds) Literacy Development and Enhancement Across Orthographies and Cultures. Literacy Studies, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0834-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics