Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Frozen Section Library ((FROZEN,volume 2))

  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

Intraoperative pathology consultation (IPC) for kidney lesions is relatively infrequent.1 However, it has a definite role in the surgical management of these lesions.2 Gross and frozen section (FS) consultations were requested in 10.8% and 12.2%, respectively, for 6,907 radical nephrectomy specimens; whereas the percentages were 11.2% and 53.8%, respectively, for 600 partial nephrectomy specimens.2 The possible reasons for intraoperative pathology consultation are listed in Table 1.1. The indications for IPC are not well defined and probably reflect personal preference, institutional tradition, and the types of hospitals.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oneson RH, Minke JA, Silverberg SG. Intraoperative pathologic consultation. An audit of 1,000 recent consecutive cases. Am J Sur Pathol. 1989;13:237–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DC, Shah RB, Bruhn A, Madison R, Saigal CS. Trends in the use of gross and frozen section pathological consultations during partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2008;179:461–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krishnan B, Lechago J, Ayala G, Truong L. Intraoperative consultation for renal lesions. Implications and diagnostic pitfalls in 324 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:528–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blute ML, Leibovich BC, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H. A protocol for performing extended lymph node dissection using primary tumor pathological features for patients treated with radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;172:465–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell SC, Fichtner J, Novick AC, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of the role of ultrasonography and histopathological frozen sections. J Urol. 1996;155:1191–1195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eble JN, Sauter S, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. Pathology & Genetics of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parsons MA, Harris SC, Longstaff AJ, Grainger RG. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a pathological, clinical and aetiological analysis of 87 cases. Diagn Histopathol. 1983;6:203–219.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobyan DC, Truong LD, Eknoyan G. Renal malacoplakia reappraised. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;22:243–252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva EG, Kraemer B. Intraoperative Pathologic Diagnosis: Frozen Sections and Other Technique. Wilkins & Williams; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iskandar SS, Prahlow JA, White WL. Lipid-laden foamy macrophages in renal cell carcinoma. Potential frozen section diagnostic pitfall. Pathol Res Pract. 1993;189:549–552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amin MB, Crotty TB, Tickoo SK, Farrow GM. Renal oncocytoma: a reappraisal of morphologic features with clinicopathologic findings in 80 cases. Am J Sur Pathol. 1997;21:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cochand-Priollet B, Molinie V, Bougaran J, et al. Renal chromophobe cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. A comparative morphologic, histochemical, and immunohistochemical study of 124 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:1081–1086.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Latham B, Dickersin GR, Oliva E. Subtypes of chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: an ultrastructural and histochemical study of 13 cases. Am J Sur Pathol. 1999;23:530–535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yip SK, Tan PH, Cheng WS, Li MK, Foo KT. Surgical management of angiomyolipoma: nephron-sparing surgery for symptomatic tumour. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000;34:32–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001;166:6–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kubinski DJ, Clark PE, Assimos DG, Hall MC. Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2004;64:31–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Breda A, Stepanian SV, Liao J, et al. Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe. J Urol. 2007;178:47–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eble JN. Angiomyolipoma of kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1998;15:21–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Peralta-Venturina M, Moch H, Amin M, et al. Sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma: a study of 101 cases. Am J Sur Pathol. 2001;25:275–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grignon DJ, Eble JN. Papillary and metanephric adenomas of the kidney. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1998;15:41–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ro JY, Ayala AG, el-Naggar A, Grignon DJ, Hogan SF, Howard DR. Angiomyolipoma of kidney with lymph node involvement. DNA flow cytometric analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114:65–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perez-Montiel D, Wakely PE, Hes O, Michal M, Suster S. High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:494–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kennedy SM, Merino MJ, Linehan WM, Roberts JR, Robertson CN, Neumann RD. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. Hum Pathol. 1990;21:449–456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis CJ, Jr., Mostofi FK, Sesterhenn IA. Renal medullary carcinoma. The seventh sickle cell nephropathy. Am J Sur Pathol. 1995;19:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moncino MD, Friedman HS, Kurtzberg J, Pizzo SV. Papillary adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis in a child: case report and brief review of the literature. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1990;18:81–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Warren KS, McFarlane JP. The Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses. BJU Int. 2005;95:939–942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Todd TD, Dhurandhar B, Mody D, Ramzy I, Truong LD. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney. Morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111:317–328.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Truong LD, Krishnan B, Cao JT, Barrios R, Suki WN. Renal neoplasm in acquired cystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Watson ML. Complications of polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 1997;51:353–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eble JN, Bonsib SM. Extensively cystic renal neoplasms: cystic nephroma, cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma, multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma, and cystic hamartoma of renal pelvis. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1998;15:2–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Andonian S, Janetschek G, Lee BR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an update on contemporary issues. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol. 2008;179:2158–2163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lam JS, Bergman J, Breda A, Schulam PG. Importance of surgical margins in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:308–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eroglu M, Unsal A, Bakirtas H, Tekdogan U, Ataoglu O, Balbay MD. Routine frozen-section biopsy from the surgical bed should be performed during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39:222–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lattouf JB, Beri A, D’Ambros OF, Grull M, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: technique and results. Eur Urol. 2008;54:409–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McHale T, Malkowicz SB, Tomaszewski JE, Genega EM. Potential pitfalls in the frozen section evaluation of parenchymal margins in nephron-sparing surgery. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:903–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol. 2003;44:448–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsuchiya K, Jinbo H, Kurita M, et al. Pathologic examination of renal cell cancer by means of step-sectioning. Int J Urol. 2000;7:335–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baltaci S, Orhan D, Soyupek S, Beduk Y, Tulunay O, Gogus O. Influence of tumor stage, size, grade, vascular involvement, histological cell type and histological pattern on multifocality of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2000;164:36–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Renshaw AA, Corless CL. Papillary renal cell carcinoma. Histology and immunohistochemistry. Am J Sur Pathol. 1995;19:842–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tickoo SK, Reuter VE, Amin MB, et al. Renal oncocytosis: a morphologic study of fourteen cases. Am J Sur Pathol. 1999;23:1094–1101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bernie JE, Albers L, Baird S, Parsons CL. Synchronous ipsilateral renal adenocarcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis and metastatic renal lymphoma. J Urol. 2000;164:773–774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jimenez RE, Eble JN, Reuter VE, et al. Concurrent angiomyolipoma and renal cell neoplasia: a study of 36 cases. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:157–163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Solomon D, Schwartz A. Renal pathology in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1072–1079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Walther MM, Choyke PL, Glenn G, et al. Renal cancer in families with hereditary renal cancer: prospective analysis of a tumor size threshold for renal parenchymal sparing surgery. J Urol. 1999;161:1475–1479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Steinbach F, Novick AC, Zincke H, et al. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease: a multicenter study. J Urol. 1995;153:1812–1816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lubensky IA, Pack S, Ault D, et al. Multiple neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease patients: histopathological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:223–231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Truong LD, Caraway N, Ngo T, Laucirica R, Katz R, Ramzy I. Renal lymphoma. The diagnostic and therapeutic roles of fine-needle aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:18–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Anderson CM, Pusztai L, Palmer JL, Cabanillas F, Ellerhorst JA. Coincident renal cell carcinoma and nonHodgkin’s lymphoma: the M. D. Anderson experience and review of the literature. J Urol. 1998;159:714–717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Dorey F, et al. Renal cell carcinoma with retroperitoneal lymph nodes: role of lymph node dissection. J Urol. 2003;169:2076–2083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Walker PD, Cavallo T, Bonsib SM. Practice guidelines for the renal biopsy. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:1555–1563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hefter LG, Brennan GG. Transillumination of renal biopsy specimens for rapid identification of glomeruli. Kidney Int. 1981;20:411–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Corwin HL, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ. The importance of sample size in the interpretation of the renal biopsy. Am J Nephrol. 1988;8:85–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Colvin RB, Cohen AH, Saiontz C, et al. Evaluation of pathologic criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: reproducibility, sensitivity, and clinical correlation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:1930–1941.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999;55:713–723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sung RS, Christensen LL, Leichtman AB, et al. Determinants of discard of expanded criteria donor kidneys: impact of biopsy and machine perfusion. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:783–792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Randhawa P. Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:1361–1365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Munivenkatappa RB, Schweitzer EJ, Papadimitriou JC, et al. The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:2316–2324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gaber LW, Moore LW, Alloway RR, Amiri MH, Vera SR, Gaber AO. Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts. Transplantation. 1995;60:334–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pastural M, Barrou B, Delcourt A, Bitker MO, Ourahma S, Richard F. Successful kidney transplantation using organs from a donor with disseminated intravascular coagulation and impaired renal function: case report and review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:412–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Colvin RB, Nickeleit V. Renal transplant pathology. In: Jennette JC, Olson JL, Schwartz MM, Silva FG, eds. Heptinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:1347–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wunderlich H, Wilhelm S, Reichelt O, Zermann DH, Borner R, Schubert J. Renal cell carcinoma in renal graft recipients and donors: incidence and consequence. Urol Int. 2001;67:24–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ditonno P, Lucarelli G, Bettocchi C, et al. Incidentally discovered yellowish lesions in a renal graft from a deceased donor. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:2062–2064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Penn I. Primary kidney tumors before and after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;59:480–485.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Truong, L.D., Ro, J.Y., Goldfarb, R.A., Shen, S.S. (2009). Kidney. In: Frozen Section Library: Genitourinary Tract. Frozen Section Library, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0691-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0691-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0690-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0691-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics