Skip to main content

Procurement Success vs. SRM Failure

The Rise of Procurement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supplier relationship management

Abstract

Let us be clear about one thing right from the start. This is not another book bashing procurement and calling out its allegedly many and obvious shortcomings. Over the past 20 years, procurement has made lots of great strides. A. T. Kearney’s periodic study Assessment of Excellence in Procurement (AEP) speaks a clear language. Across industries and at a global level, procurement functions are in a pretty good shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schuh, Christian, Robert Kromoser, Michael F. Strohmer, Joseph L. Raudabaugh, and Alenka Triplat. The Purchasing Chessboard: 64 Methods to Reduce Costs and Increase Value with Suppliers, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Springer, 2012).

  2. 2.

    Schuh, Christian, Stephen Easton, Peter Scharbert, Armin Scharlach, and Michael F. Strohmer. The CPO: Transforming Procurement in the Real World (New York: Apress Media, 2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Stephen Easton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schuh, C., Strohmer, M., Easton, S., Hales, M., Triplat, A. (2014). Procurement Success vs. SRM Failure. In: Supplier relationship management. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-6260-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics