Abstract
Unless employers know a problem exists, they cannot correct it. There is one area, however, in which employers have an absolute legal obligation to take in, investigate, and remedy employee complaints—namely, unlawful discrimination and harassment. Additionally, whenever employees complain about illegal activities, they enjoy a right to continued employment free from retaliation. These two issues, taken together, present one of the most dangerous employees an employer will face—the complainer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Yukins v. First Student, Inc., 481 F.3d 552, 556 (7th Cir. 2007) (emphasis added).
Case no. 11-1182, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14875 (7th Cir. ill. July 20, 2012).
Id. at *22.
Id. at*25-26.
39 A.3d 199 (N.J. 2011).
Id.
Kimmel v. Lowe’s Inc., Case No. 23982, 2011-Ohio-28, ¶ 9 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011).
523 U.S. 75, 118 s. Ct. 998, 140 L Ed. 2d 201 (1998).
682 F.3d 463 (6th Cir. 2012).
Id. at 467-68.
Case no. 1:06-CV-2337, 2010 U.S. dist. LEXIS 34975 (n.d. Ohio Apr. 9, 2010).
Case no. 4:10-CV-2755, 2012 U.S. dist. LEXIS 43365 (n.d. Ohio mar. 29, 2012).
Id. at*16.
646 F.3d 461 (7th Cir. 2011).
666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012).
Id. at 436.
Case No. 1:09-CV-2119, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19881 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2011).
507 F.3d 1139 (8th Cir. 2007).
Case No. 08-6516, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7863 (6th Cir. 2010)
12 F.3d 668, 675 (7th Cir. 1993).
Case no. 2009-T-0058, 2010-Ohio-406 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 5, 2010).
Id. at ¶ 47.
526 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2008).
Id. at 887.
639 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2011).
Id. at 8.
358 N.L.R.B. No. 93(2012).
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Enforcement Guidance on Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html, June 18, 1999.
Case No. 08-cv-0683-MJR, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47121 (S.D. III. May 3, 2011).
STLToday.com, “Jury awards $95 million in Fairview Heights sex harassment suit,” http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_6f46fa47-3a8b-5266-b094-b95910d51c46.html. June 10, 2011.
Case No. 10-5937, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17365 (6th Cir. 2012).
Case No. 11–1148, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17793 (6th Cir. 2012).
Id. at 10–11.
555 us 271, 129 S. Ct. 846, 172 L. Ed. 2d 650 (2009).
Id. at 852-853.
516 F. 3d 516 (6th Cir. 2007).
Id. at 525.
Case No. 95996, 2011-Ohio-3261 (Ohio Ct. App. June 30, 2011).
Id. at ¶¶ 30, 34, 36.
547 US 53, 126 s. Ct. 2405, 165 L Ed. 2d 345.
Id. at 68.
Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp. (2d Cir. 2005).
James v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville (6th Cir. June 20, 2007).
Bragg v. Office of the Dist. Atty., 704 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (d. Colo. 2009).
Brazoria Cty. v. EEOC, 391 F.3d 685 (5th Cir. 2004)
520 F.3d 644 (6th Cir. 2008).
131 S. Ct. 863, 178 L. Ed. 2d 694 (2011).
Id. at 869–870.
Greer-Burger v. Temesi, 879 N.E.2d 174 (Ohio 2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
Id. at 181.
Id. at 184-85.
Id. at 186 (Lanzinger, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
28 U.S.C. § 1927.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.
Case no. 11–5625, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14415, *9 (6th Cir. 2012).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Jonathan T. Hyman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hyman, J.T. (2012). The Right to Be Told When There Is a Problem. In: The Employer Bill of Rights. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4552-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4552-0_6
Publisher Name: Apress, Berkeley, CA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4302-4551-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4302-4552-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)Apress Access Books