Abstract
Employers want to be able to hire the best and most qualified to staff every position. Yet the myriad equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws often intervene to roadblock these efforts. Affirmative action—requiring an employer to hire a qualified minority candidate instead of a similarly qualified nonminority candidate—remains in play for public employers and those with certain equal Employment opportunity obligations pursuant to federal contracts. even without affirmative action obligations, though, employers have a difficult time hiring the best person for a position. And the equal Employment opportunity Commission (EEOC) is making it increasingly difficult to make hiring decisions by taking away the types of legitimate information businesses can consider in the hiring process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See Nieman v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., Case no. no. 11-3404, 2012 U.S Dist. LEXIS 59180 (C.D. III. Apr. 26, 2012) (concluding that the employer could have taken age into consideration in deciding not to hire the plaintiff, because the hiring manager viewed the plaintiff’s linkedin profile, which included the year he graduated from college).
242 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k)(1)(A)(i).
Wards Cove Packing Co., Inc. v. San Antonio, 490 U.S. 642 (1989); Isabel v. City of Memphis, 404 F..3d 404, 411 (6th Cir. 2005).
Hazelwood School Dist. v. United States, 433 U.S. 299, 308 (1977).
29 C.F.R. § 1607.4(d); see also NAACP v. City of Mansfield, 866 F.2d 162 (6th Cir. 1989).
29C.F.R. § 1607.4(d).
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio, 490 U.S. 642, 659-60 (1989).
29 C.F.R. § 1607.5(A).
29 C.F.R. § 1607.9(A).
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Enforcement Guidance,” http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm, April 25, 2012.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Statement of Christine V. Walters, MAS, JD, SPHR, Society for Human Resource Management,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/10-20-10/walter.cfm, October 20, 2010.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of Algernon Austin Ph.D. Director of the Program on Race Ethnicity, and the Economy Economic Policy Institute,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/2-16-11/austin.cfm, February 16, 2011.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of James S.. Urban, Partner, Jones day,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/2-16-11/urban.cfm, February 16, 2011.
U.S. Equal Employment Oportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of Fernan R. Cepero Vice President for Human Resources The YMCA of Greater Rochester,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/2-16-11/cepero.cfm, February 16, 2011.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “EEOC Explores Plight Of Older Workers In Current Economic Climate,” http://eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-17-10.cfm, November 17, 2010.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of William E. Spriggs, Ph. d. Assistant Secretary for policy U.S. department of labor,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/11-17-10/spriggs.cfm, november 17, 2010.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of mary Anne Sedey Partner Sedey Harper P.C.,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/11-17-10/sedey.cfm, November 17, 2010.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of Deborah Russell on Behalf Of AARP,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/11-17-10/russell.cfm, November 17,2010.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Written Testimony of Cornelia Gamlem President GEMS Group and Society for Human Resource Management,” http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/11-17-10/gamlem.cfm, november 17, 2010.
Federal Trade Commission, “A Summary of Your Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act,” http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/credit/cre35.pdF.
29C.F.R. § 1606.7(a).
Id.
See EEOC v. Premier Operator Servs., 113 F.Supp.2d 1066 (N.D Tex. sept. 13, 2000).
EEOC v. Sephora USA, LLC., 419 F.Supp.2d 408 (S.D.N.Y 2005).
Id.
Id.
Id.
Id.
Prado v. L. Luria & Son, 975 F. Supp. 1349 (S.D Fla. 1997).
Barber v. Lovelace Sandia Health Sys., 409 F.Supp.2d 1313 (D.N.M 2005).
First Union Corp. of Va., 894 F. supp. 933, 944 (E.D. Va. 1995).
618 F.2d 264(5th Cir. 1980).
433 F.3d 1294 (10th Cir. 2006).
113 F.Supp. 2d 1066 (D. Tex. 2000).
411 F. 3d 831(7th Cir. 2005).
The MMPI is one of the most commonly used personality tests in mental health. it is used to assist in identifying personality structure and psychopathology. See Butcher, J.N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A, and Kaemmer, B., The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring (Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1989). 42 WKyC.com, “Cleveland: Temp agency settles after profiling allegations,” http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=141064, July 23, 2010.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Jonathan T. Hyman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hyman, J.T. (2012). The Right to Hire on Qualifications. In: The Employer Bill of Rights. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4552-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4552-0_2
Publisher Name: Apress, Berkeley, CA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4302-4551-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4302-4552-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)Apress Access Books