Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 3))

Abstract

“Almost every German university hospital has a chair of psychosomatic medicine,” noted the obituary for pioneering clinical biosemiotician Thure von Uexküll upon the occasion of his death at age 96 in 2004. “German medical students are obliged to attend courses in medical psychology, sociology, and psychosomatic medicine, and more than 7,000 beds in German rehabilitation hospitals are devoted to the treatment of patients with psychosomatic disorders,” the obituary continued, concluding that “the unique position of psychosomatic medicine in Germany – in comparison with other European countries – is largely due to the continuous engagement of Thure von Uexküll” (British Medical Journal 2004: 1047).

Thure von Uexküll (1908–2004), Werner Geigges (1953– ), and Jörg Herrmann (1944– )

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Krampen (1986: 84), J. von Uexküll’s term Umwelt “means the subjective world of what is meaningful impingement for the living being in terms of its own information processing equipment, sign systems, and codes”.

  2. 2.

    Ethnologists have coined, by analogy with the linguistic concepts of “phonetics” and “phonemics”, the terms “etic” and “ernic” to indicate two different approaches to a foreign culture. An approach from “outside” in which the observer applies the criteria of his or her own culture to foreign phenomena is called “etic”. The “emic” method implies the observer's attempt to use the criteria of the culture under observation. Adopting these ethnological concepts for semiotic purposes, we may characterize the attitude of an observer of signs who is interested only in the physical and chemical properties of the sign vehicles as “sign-etic”, In contrast, the observer’s attitude is called “sign-emic” if his or her interest is centered on the meanings of sign vehicles (see Uexküll 1990).

  3. 3.

     We may distinguish three forms of semiosis by considering differences in the contributions of emitter and receiver: (a) Semioses of information, in which the inanimate environment acts as a “quasi-emitter”, but assumes no semiotic functions - they must be performed by the receiver alone (Bottner 1980); (b) Semioses of symptomatization, in which the emitter is a living being which sends signals through its behavior – although these signals are not directed toward any receiver, they inform the expert of the situation and/or the state of the living being; and (c) Semioses of communication, the only sign processes in which emitter and receiver share the semiotic tasks (see Uexküll 1990).

  4. 4.

    In the original German version:

    Voller Apfel, Birne und Banane,

    Stachelbeere … Alles dieses spricht

    Tod und Leben in den Mund … Ich ahne …

    Lest es einem Kind vom Angesicht,

    wenn es sie erschmeckt. Dies kommt von weit.

    Wird euch langsam namenlos im Munde?

    Wo sonst Worte waren, fließen Funde,

    aus dem Fruchtfleisch überrascht befreit. [1936: 60]

References

  • Ader, R. (1981). Psychoneuroimmunology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonowsky, A. (1987). The salutogenetic perspective: Toward a new view of health and illness. Advances 4(1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besedovsky, H., Del Rey, A., Sorkin, E., Dinarello, C. A. (1986). Immunoregulatory feedback between interleukin-I and glucocorticoid hormones. Science 233, 652–654.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Böttner, M. (1980). Zeichensystem der Tiere. Ein Versuch angewandter Semiotik. Unpublished dissertation, University of Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1953). Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage. Boston: Charles T. Branford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge, U. L. (1986). Bienentanz und Menschensprache. In: Eschbach, A. (Ed.) Perspektiven des Verstehens. Bochum: Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1945). Formulierungen iiber die zwei Prinzipien des psychischen Geschehens [1911]. In Gesammelte Werke [Collected Works], vol. 8, 229–238. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J., Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson, M., Merrell, F. (Eds.) On Semiotic Modeling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 117–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürny, Ch. (1990). Psychische und soziale Faktoren in der Entstehung und im Verlauf maligner Erkrankungen. In: Uexküll, T. von (Ed.) Psychosomatische Medizin. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1968). Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton. [Trans. by Allan R. Keiler from Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze, Uppsala, 1944.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquemart, F., Coutinho, A. (1988). Observer, immune system and their respective objects (about self-non-self discrimination). In: Sercarz, E. E. et al. (Eds.) The Semiotics of Cellular Communication in the Immune System. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerne, N. K. (1985). The generative grammar of the immune system. Science 229, 1057–1059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, P., Havemann, K. (1988). Wachstumsfaktoren, Rezeptoren und Krebs. Der Internist 29, 430–437.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, G. (1969). Semiotik und Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosterhalfen, W., Klosterhalfen, S. (1990). Psychoimmunologie. In: Uexküll, T. von (Ed.) Psychosomatische Medizin. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, A. G. (1973). Mutation and human cancer. Advances in Cancer Research 17, 317–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, H., Urbain, J., Cazenave, P. A. (Eds.) (1984). Idiotypy in Biology and Medicine. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köpchen, H. P., KliiBendorf, D., Sommer, D. (1981). Neurophysiological background of central neural cardiovascular-respiratory coordination: Basic remarks and experimental approach. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 3, 335–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. (1981). Phytosemiotics. Semiotica 36 (3/4), 187–209. [Reprinted in Frontiers in Semiotics, John Deely et al. (eds.), 83–95. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. et al. (1981). Die Welt als Zeichen: Klassiker der modernen Semiotik. Berlin: Severin und Siedler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1927). Beobachtungen mit Dohlen. Journal für Ornithologie 75, 511–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, H. R. (1983). Selbstorganisation als Ordnungsprinzip im Zentralnervensystem. Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich 128 (3), 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, H. R. (1984–1985). Komplexitat und Stabilitat im Zentralnervensystem. Bulletin der Schweizerischen Akademie der Medizinischen Wissenschaften 85, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maelike, A. (1985). Zell-zu-Zellkommunikation durch “gap-junctions”. Nachr. Chem. Techn. Lab. 33(2), 976–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. (1988). Der Baum der Erkenntnis. Munich: Scherz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B. (1975). The view from within: Pathways to the study of perception. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 136, 109–131. [Quoted in: K. R. Popper and J. C. Eccles (1977), The Self and Its Brain, 253. Berlin and New York: Springer.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nossal, G. J. V. (1988). Wie Zellen Antikorper bilden. In: Kohler, G. (Ed.) Immunsystem. Abwehr und Selbsterkennung auf molekularem Niveau. Heidelberg: Spektrum der Wissenschaft, pp. 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (1985). Handbuch der Semiotik. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1988). Naturordnung und Zeichenprozefi. Schriften iiber Semiotik und Naturphilosophie, (= Aachener Studien zur Semiotik und Kommunikationsforschung 18), H. Pape (Ed.). Aachen: Alano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1955). The Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H. (1976). Die Frage nach der Conditio humana. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilke, R. M. (1936). Sonnets to Orpeus, trans. by J. B. Leishman. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitt, I. M., Brostoff, J., Male, D. K. (1988). Immunology. London: Gower Medical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1986). A Leg to Stand On. London: Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1976). Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington and Lisse: Indiana University and The Peter de Ridder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, N., Brostoff, J., James, K. (1985). Introducing Immunology. London and New York: Gower Medical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembrock, G. (1975). Biokommunikation. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, J. (1968). General System Theory. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch, K. (1965). Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1905). Leitfaden in das Studium der experimentellen Biologie der Wassertiere. Wiesbaden: J.F. Bergmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Paetel.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In Instinctive Behavior, trans. by Claire H. Schiller (Ed.), 5–80. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1), 25–82. [Special issue of Semiotica on J. von Uexküll’s Bedeutungslehre (Leipzig: Barth, 1940); Guest editor: T. von Uexküll. Trans. by Barry Stone and Herbert Weiner.]

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1952). Untersuchungen iiber das Phanomen der “Stimmung” mit einer Analyse der Nausea. Zeitschrift fiir klinische Medizin 149, 132–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1963). Grundfragen der Psychosomatischen Medizin. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1977). Psychosomatische Probleme im Bereich der Kardiologie. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 53, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1982). Glossary. Semiotica 42(1), 83–87. [Special issue of Semiotica on J. von Uexküll’s Bedeutungslehre (Leipzig: Barth, 1940); Guest editor: T. von Uexkiill. Trans. by Barry Stone and Herbert Weiner.]

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1986). Soziale Krankheit und soziale Gesundung. In Gesammelte Werke [Collected Works], vol. 8, 31–91. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T. (1990). Biosemiosis. Handbook of Semiotics, Chapter III, Article 16b. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, T., Wesiack, W. (1988). Theorie der Humanmedizin: Grundlagen drztlichen Denkens und Handelns. Munich: Urban and Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, V. (1940). Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Leipzig: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1989). The revolution in stress theory and research. In: Lieberman, R., Yager, J. (Eds.) Stress in Psychiatry and Medicine. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, C., Zang, K. D., Blin, N. (1989). Tumor-Suppressorgene. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift 114, 1496–1502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, W. (1990). Die Herausforderung der Evolutionsbiologie: an wen? Merkur 44(I), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Favareau, D. (2009). Endosemiosis. In: Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9650-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics