In this chapter, the approach to expert evidence in some of the main common law jurisdictions is considered. Evidence given by experts is a special form of evidence and it is treated as exceptional in that there are certain hurdles that must be overcome before it will be allowed to be led. As litigation in some jurisdictions is becoming more and more adversarial in nature, lawyers and judges today are far more sceptical than in the past about the stature of expert evidence. This is particularly so with scientific expert evidence given its status, impact and objectivity in any case where eyewitness evidence is either sparse or unreliable. Consideration is given to the legal criteria applied by courts in civil and criminal cases to the question of whether opinion evidence given by an individual qualifies as expert evidence. The critical concept of admissibility of evidence is examined, in order to discover the conditions under which expert evidence will be permitted in the courtroom. Key cases from the United States, the UK, Australia and Canada are dealt with. Novel scientific evidence is treated as a special case in some jurisdictions, and the conditions for the inclusion of such evidence are discussed. The way in which evidence is presented is also touched upon, since presentation can be as important as substance, particularly in jury cases. This chapter is designed to highlight, in particular for non-legally qualified readers, the legal perspective on the subject of scientific expert evidence. This is an important perspective given that lawyers and judges (as well as jurors) do not approach the justification and presentation of such evidence in the same way as the scientist does. The law has constructed some artificial barriers and checks and balances into this question, in order to prevent the “mystic infallibility” of expert evidence having a disproportionate effect on the decision maker. Knowing what these barriers are, and how to prepare to cross them, is a key part in the preparation of techniques new and old and in the presentation of evidence about them. All of this is useful in considering the presentation of soil forensics expert evidence, since courts adopt a universal approach to all expert evidence, irrespective of the subject matter. As the courts are introduced to expert evidence from more and more areas of expertise, so they have become increasingly wary of evidence of techniques with which they are unfamiliar. On the other hand, well researched, objectively justifiable and clearly presented expert evidence will pass muster every time. Knowing what the law regards as essential in advance is key to the successful gathering, analysing and presentation of such evidence, and, in turn, to success in the outcome sought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen KS (2007). Expert Witnessing and Scientific Testimony: Surviving in the Courtroom. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Cwik CH and North JL (2003). Scientific Evidence Review: Admissibility and Use of Expert
Evidence in the Courtroom. American Bar Association, Chicago.
De Cruz P (2007). Comparative Law in a Changing World, 3rd edition. Routledge Cavendish, New York.
Freckleton I and Selby H (2002). Expert Evidence: Law, Practice, Procedure and Advocacy, 2nd edition. Lawbook Company, Pyrmont, New South Wales.
Glancy GD (2007). The admissibility of expert evidence in Canada. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 35:350–356.
Kaye DH, Bernstein DB and Mnookin JL (2004). The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Expert Evidence (updated 2008). Aspen, New York.
Keane A (2006). The Modern Law of Evidence, 6th edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mandell MS (1999). Kumho: Some Clarity — but not the Last Word — on experts. The Testifying Expert, June 1999 Vol. 3.
Matson J V, Daou SF and Soper JG (2004). Effective Expert Witnessing: Practices for the 21st Century, 4th edition. CRC, New York.
Redmayne M (2001). Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Scottish Parliament Justice 1 Committee (2007). 3rd Report Session 2 Inquiry into the Scottish Criminal Record Office and the Scottish Fingerprint Service, 15th February 2007.
Tapper C (2004). Cross and Tapper on Evidence, 10th edition. LexisNexis, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Auchie, D.P. (2009). Expert Scientific Evidence in Court: The Legal Considerations. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9203-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9204-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)