Skip to main content

The Forensic Analysis of Sediments Recovered from Footwear

  • Chapter
Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics

Abstract

The forensic analysis of sediments recovered from footwear has the potential to yield much useful information concerning the movements of a person before, during and after a crime has taken place. Three experimental studies and a number of examples of forensic casework provide insight into the complexity of the spatial distribution of geoforensic materials on the soles of footwear and the persistence of these materials over time on the soles and uppers. These findings have implications for both the geoforensic sampling protocols and procedures for footwear submitted for analysis in a criminal investigation and also for the analysis of any materials recovered. The preservation of sediment on a shoe sole will vary, with certain areas generally retaining more sediment than others. The sequential layering of sediments that have been transferred to the shoe will be preserved in some cases and in certain areas, but generally undergoes complex mixing. Such mixing of sediment from different sources occurs both across the shoe sole and also through time. It is therefore important to be aware of these variations when taking samples for analysis if representative samples are to be taken and meaningful interpretation of any analysis derived is to be effected. Furthermore, such mixing of pre-, syn- and post-forensic event sources has implications for the appropriateness of different analytical techniques. Visual identification techniques which are able to identify where such mixing has taken place are preferred to forms of analysis that require homogenisation of the sample prior to analysis, as this reduces the possibility of false negative or positive associations when undertaking comparison of samples in a forensic context. The context within which any sampling or analysis is undertaken is crucial for a meaningful and accurate interpretation of the geoforensic evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bull PA and Morgan RM (2006). Sediment fingerprints: a forensic technique using quartz sand grains. Science and Justice 46:64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull PA, Morgan RM, Wilson HE and Dunkerley S (2004). Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation. A comment. Science and Justice 44:173–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bull PA, Morgan RM, Sagovsky A and Hughes GJA (2006a). The transfer and persistence of trace particulates: experimental studies using clothing fabrics. Science and Justice 46:182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull PA, Parker AJ and Morgan RM (2006b). The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. Forensic Science International 162:6–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bull PA, Morgan RM and Freudiger-Bonzon J (2008). A critique of the present use of some geo-chemical techniques in geoforensic analysis. Forensic Science International 178:e35–e40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chazottes V, Brocard C and Peyrot B (2004). Particle size analysis of soils under simulated scene of crime conditions: the interest of multivariate analyses. Forensic Science International 140:159–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hessert MJ, Vyas M, Leach J, Hu K, Lipsitz LA and Novak V (2005). Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatrics 5:8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks T, Vanina R and Margot P (1996). Transfer and persistence of glass fragments on garments. Science and Justice 36:101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks M and Walsh KAJ (1999). Fine resolution of pollen patterns in limited space: differentiating a crime scene from an alibi scene seven metres apart. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44:417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks M, Coulson SA and Walsh KAJ (1999). Forensic palynology: variation in the pollen content of soil on shoes and in shoeprints in soil. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44:119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman K and Rudin N (2002). The origin of evidence. Forensic Science International 126:11–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Locard E (1928). Dust and its analysis. Police Journal 1:177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locard E (1930). Analyses of dust traces parts I, II and III. American Journal of Police Science 1:276–298, 401–418 and 496–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenhall DC (2006). Hypericum pollen determines the presence of burglars at the scene of a crime: An example of forensic palynology. Forensic Science International 163:231–235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mildenhall DC, Wiltshire PEJ and Bryant VM (2006). Forensic palynology: why do it and how it works. Forensic Science International 163:163–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM and Bull PA (2006). Data interpretation in forensic sediment geochemistry. Environmental Forensics 7:325–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM and Bull PA (2007a). The philosophy, nature and practice of forensic sediment analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 31:43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM and Bull PA (2007b). Forensic geoscience and crime detection. Identification, interpretation and presentation in forensic geoscience. Minerva Medicolegale 127:73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Wiltshire P, Parker A and Bull PA (2006). The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. Forensic Science International 162:152–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Allen E, Lightowler Z, Freudiger-Bonzon J and Bull PA (2008). A forensic geo-science framework and practice. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 2: 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray RC and Tedrow JCF (1975). Forensic Geology: Earth Science and Criminal Investigation. Rutgers University Press, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounds CA and Smalldon KW (1975a). The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear part I — Fibre transference. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 15:17–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pounds CA and Smalldon KW (1975b). The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear part II — Fibre persistence. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 15:29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pounds CA and Smalldon KW (1975c). The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear part III — a preliminary investigation of the mechanisms involved. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 15:197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson J and Roux C (2000). Transfer and persistence. In: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (Eds Siegel JA, Saukko PJ and Knupfer GC), pp. 834–838. Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux C, Langdon S, Waight D and Robertson J (1999). The transfer and persistence of automotive carpet fibres on shoe soles. Science and Justice 39:239–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen V, Korpelainen H and Kostamo K (2007). Forensic botany: usability of bryophyte material in forensic studies. Forensic Science International 172:161–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins KG, Emes A and Brackley LH (2002). The transfer and persistence of small fragments of polyurethane foam onto clothing. Science and Justice 42:105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth M. Morgan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, R.M. et al. (2009). The Forensic Analysis of Sediments Recovered from Footwear. In: Ritz, K., Dawson, L., Miller, D. (eds) Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9204-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics