Abstract
Work in the foundations of mathematics should provide systematic frameworks for important parts of the practice of mathematics, and the frameworks should be grounded in conceptual analyses that reflect central aspects of mathematical experience. The Hilbert School of the 1920s used suitable frameworks to formalize (parts of) mathematics and provided conceptual analyses. However, its analyses were mostly restricted to finitist mathematics, the programmatic basis for proving the consistency of frameworks and, thus, their instrumental usefulness. Is the broader foundational quest beyond Hilbert’s reach? The answer to this question seems simple: “Yes & No”. It is “Yes”, if we focus exclusively on Hilbert’s finitism; it is “No”, if we take into account the more sweeping scope of Hilbert and Bernays’s foundational thinking. The evident limitations of Hilbert’s “formalism” have been pointed out all too frequently; in contrast, I will trace connections of Hilbert’s work, beginning in the late 19th century, to contemporary work in mathematical logic. Bernays’s reflective philosophical investigations play a significant role in reinforcing these connections. My paper pursues two complementary goals, namely, to describe a global, integrating perspective for foundational work and to formulate some more local, focused problems for mathematical work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann, W., 1924 Begründung des “tertium non datur” mittels der Hilbertschen Theorie der Widerspruchsfreiheit; Mathematische Annalen 93, 1–36.
Aczel, P., 1977 An introduction to inductive definitions; in: Handbook of Mathematical Logic, J. Barwise (ed.), Amsterdam, 739–782.
Aspray, W. and Kitcher, P. (eds.), 1988 History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XI, Minneapolis.
Bernays, P., 1922 Über Hilberts Gedanken zur Grundlegung der Mathematik; Jahresberichte DMV 31, 10–19.
Bernays, P., 1928 Über Nelsons Stellungnahme in der Philosophie der Mathematik; Die Naturwissenschaften, 16 (9), 142–145.
Bernays, P., 1928a Die Grundbegriffe der reinen Geometrie in ihrem Verhältnis zur Anschauung; Die Naturwissenschaften, 16 (12), 197–203.
Bernays, P., 1930 Die Philosophie der Mathematik und die Hilbertsche Beweistheorie; in: (Bernays 1976), 17–61.
Bernays, P., 1930a Die Grundgedanken der Fries’schen Philosophie in ihrem Verhältnis zum heutigen Stand der Wissenschaft; Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, Neue Folge, vol. 5 (2), 97–113. (Based on a talk presented on August 10, 1928.)
Bernays, P., 1934 Über den Platonismus in der Mathematik; in: (Bernays 1976), 62–78.
Bernays, P., 1935 Hilberts Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Arithmetik; in: (Hilbert 1935), 196–216.
Bernays, P., 1937 Grundsätzliche Betrachtungen zur Erkenntnistheorie; Abhandlungen der Fries’schen Schule, Neue Folge, vol. 6 (3–4), 278–290.
Bernays, P., 1950 Mathematische Existenz und Widerspruchsfreiheit; in: (Bernays 1976), 92–106.
Bernays, P., 1954 Zur Beurteilung der Situation in der beweistheoretischen Forschung; Revue internationale de philosophie 8, 9–13; Dicussion, 15–21.
Bernays, P., 1970 Die schematische Korrespondenz und die idealisierten Stukturen; in: (Bernays 1976), 176–188.
Bernays, P., 1976 Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik; Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Brouwer, L.E.J., 1927 Über Definitionsbereiche von Funktionen; Mathematische Annalen 97, 60–75; translated in: van Heijenoort, 446–463.
Brouwer, L.E.J., 1927a Intuitionistische Betrachtungen über den Formalismus; Koninklijke Akademie van wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Proceedings of the section of sciences, 31, 374–379; translated in: (van Heijenoort), 490–492.
Brouwer, L.E.J., 1953 Points and spaces; Canadian Journal of Mathematics 6, 1–17.
Buchholz, W., 2000 Relating ordinals to proofs in a more perspicuous way; to appear in: (size e.a., 2002), 37–59.
Buchholz, W., Feferman, S., Pohlers, W., and Sieg, W., 1981 Iterated inductive definitions and subsystems of analysis: recent prof-theoretical studies; Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Verlag.
Carnap, R., 1930 Die Mathematik als Zweig der Logik; Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 4, 298–310.
Church, A. and Kleene, S., 1936 Formal definitions in the theory of ordinal numbers; Fundamenta Mathematicae 28, 11–21.
Dedekind, R., 1872 Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen; in: (Dedekind 1932), pp. 315–324.
Dedekind, R., 1877 Sur la théorie des nombres entiers algébriques; Bulletin des Sciences mathématiques et astronomiques, pp. 1–121; partially reprinted in: (Dedekind 1932), pp. 262–96.
Dedekind, R., 1888 Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen; in: (Dedekind 1932), pp. 335–391.
Dedekind, R., 1890 Letter to Keferstein; in: (van Heijenoort), pp. 98–103.
Dedekind, R., 1932 Gesammelte mathematische Werke, Dritter Band; R. Fricke, E. Noether, and ö. Ore (eds.); Vieweg, Braunschweig.
Ewald, W. (ed.), 1996 From Kant to Hilbert - A source book in the foundations of mathematics; two volumes; Oxford University Press.
Feferman, S., 1981 How we got from there to here; in: (Buchholz e.a.), 1–15.
Feferman, S., 1982 Inductively presented systems and the formalization of meta-mathematics; in: Logic Colloquium ‘80, North Holland Publishing Company, 95–128.
Feferman, S. and Sieg, W., 1981 Iterated inductive definitions and subsystems of analysis; in: (Buchholz e.a.), 16–77.
Fraenkel, A., 1930 Die heutigen Gegensätze in der Grundlegung der Mathematik; Erkenntnis 1, 286–302.
Gödel, K., 1933 The present situation in the foundations of mathematics; in: Collected Works III, 36–53.
Gödel, K., 1938 Vortrag by Zilsel; in: Collected Works III, 86–113.
Gödel, K., 1986 Collected Works I; Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Gödel, K., 1990 Collected Works II; Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Gödel, K., 1995 Collected Works III; Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Hallett, M., 1994 Hilbert’s axiomatic method and the laws of thought; in: Mathematics and Mind, A. George (ed.), Oxford University Press, 158–200.
Hallett, M.,1995 Hilbert and logic; in: Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science I, M. Marion and R.S. Cohen (eds.) Kluwer, Dordrecht, 135–187.
Hand, M., 1989 A number in the exponent of an operation; Synthese 81, 243–65.
Hand, M., 1990 Hilbert’s iterativistic tendencies; History and Philosophy of Logic 11, 185–92.
Hilbert, D., 1900 Über den Zahlbegriff; Jahresbericht der DMV 8, 180–94; reprinted in: Grundlagen der Geometrie, 3. Auflage, Leipzig 1909, 256–62.
Hilbert, D., 1901 Mathematische Probleme. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem internationalen Mathematiker-Kongress zu Paris 1900; Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, 3rd series, 1, 44–63, 213–237.
Hilbert, D., 1905 Über die Grundlagen der Logik und Arithmetik; in: (Hilbert 1900a), 243–258; translated in: (van Heijenoort), 129–138.
Hilbert, D., 1922 Neubegründung der Mathematik; Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 1, 157–177.
Hilbert, D., 1923 Die logischen Grundlagen der Mathematik; Mathematische Annalen 88, 151–165.
Hilbert, D., 1925 Über das Unendliche; Mathematische Annalen 95, 1926, 161–190; translated in: (van Heijenoort), 367–392.
Hilbert, D., 1928 Die Grundlagen der Mathematik; Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 6 (1/2), 65–85.
Hilbert, D., 1935 Gesammelte Abhandlungen; Vol. 3; Springer, Berlin.
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P., 1934 Grundlagen der Mathematik; vol. I, Springer, Verlag.
Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P., 1939 Grundlagen der Mathematik; vol. II, Springer, Verlag.
Jäger, G., 1986 Theories for admissible sets – a unifying approach to proof theory; Bibliopolis, Naples.
Joyal, A. and Moerdijk, I., 1995 Algebraic Set Theory; London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 220; Cambridge University Press.
Kino, A., Myhill, J., and Vesley, R.E. (eds.), 1970 Intuitionism and Proof Theory; Proceedings of the summer conference at Buffalo, N.Y., 1968.
Mancosu, P., 1999 Between, Russell, and Hilbert: Behmann on the foundations of mathematics; Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (3), 303–330.
Moerdijk, I. and Palmgren, E., 2000 Well–founded trees in categories; Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 104, 189–218.
Moerdijk, I. and Palmgren, E., 2002 Type theories, toposes and constructive set theory: predicative aspects of AST; Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 114, 155–201.
Paetzold, H., 1995 Ernst Cassirer – Von Marburg nach New York; Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Parsons, C.D., 1980 Mathematical intuition; Proc. Aristotelian Society N.S. 80 (1979–80), 145–168.
Parsons, C.D., 1982 Objects and logic; The Monist 65 (4), 491–516.
Parsons, C.D., 1984 Arithmetic and the categories; Topoi 3 (2), 109–121.
Parsons, C.D., 1987 Developing arithmetic in set theory without infinity: Some historical remarks; History and Philosophy of Logic 8, 201–213.
Parsons, C.D., 1990 The structuralist view of mathematical objects; Synthese 84, 303–346.
Parsons, C.D., 1994 Intuition and number; in: Mathematics and Mind, A. George (ed.), Oxford University Press, 141–157.
Peckhaus, V., 1990 Hilbertprogramm und Kritische Philosophie; Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Peckhaus, V., 1994 Hilbert’s axiomatic programme and philosophy; in: The History of Modern Mathematics, vol. III (Knobloch, E. and Rowe, D.E., eds.), Academic Press, 91–112.
Peckhaus, V., 1994a Logic in transition: the logical calculi of Hilbert (1905) and Zermelo (1908); in: Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, Prawitz, D., and Westrestahl, D. (eds.), Kluwer, 311–323.
Peckhaus, V., 1995 Hilberts Logik. Von der Axiomatik zur Beweistheorie; Intern. Zs. f. Gesch. u. Ethik der Naturwiss., Techn. U. Med. 3, 65–86.
Pohlers, W., 1989 Proof Theory – an introduction; Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1407, Springer Verlag.
Poincaré, H., 1905 Les mathématiques et la logique; Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 13, 815–35; translated in (Ewald, vol. 2),
Poincaré, H., 1906 Les mathématiques et la logique; Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 14, 17–34; translated in (Ewald, vol. 2), 1038–52.
Poincaré, H., 1906a Les mathématiques et la logique; Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 14, 294–317; translated in (Ewald, vol. 2), 1052–71.
Rathjen, M., 1995 Recent advances in ordinal analysis; Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 1 (4), 468–85.
Shapiro, S., 1997 Philosophy of mathematics – Structure and ontology; Oxford University Press.
Sieg, W., 1977 Trees in Metamathematics; Ph.D. Thesis; Stanford.
Sieg, W., 1981 Inductive definitions, constructive ordinals, and normal derivations; in: (Buchholz e.a.), 143–187.
Sieg, W., 1984 Foundations for analysis and proof theory; Synthese 60 (2), 159–200.
Sieg, W., 1990 Relative consistency and accessible domains; Synthese 84, 259–97.
Sieg, W., 1997 Aspects of mathematical experience; in: Philosophy of mathematics today, E. Agazzi and G. Darvas (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 195–217.
Sieg, W., 1999 Hilbert’s programs: 1917–1922; Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (1), 1–44.
Sieg, W., Sommer, R. and Talcott, C. (eds), 2002, Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics, Association for Symbolic Logic, A.K. Peters.
Stein, H., 1988 Logos, Logic, Logistiké: Some philosophical remarks on the 19th century transformation of mathematics; in: (Aspray and Kitcher), 238–259.
Tait, W.W., 1968 Constructive Reasoning; in: Proc. 3rd Int. Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam; 185–199.
Tait, W.W., 1981 Finitism; Journal of Philosophy 78, 524–546.
Tait, W.W., 2000 Remarks on Finitism; in: (Sieg e.a., 2002), 410–419.
van Heijenoort, J. (ed.), 1967 From Frege to Gödel, a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931; Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Weyl, H., 1925 Die heutige Erkenntnislage in der Mathematik; Symposion 1, pp. 1–32. (Reprinted in vol. 2 of Weyl’s “Gesammelte Abhandlungen”, Springer Verlag, 1968, 511–542.)
Weyl, H., 1928, Diskussionsbemerkungen zu dem zweiten Hilbertschen Vortrag über die Grundlagen der Mathematik; Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 6, pp. 86–88. (Translated in (van Heijenoort), 482–4.)
Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B., 1910 Principia Mathematica, vol. 1; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B., 1912 Principia Mathematica, vol. 2; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B., 1913 Principia Mathematica, Vol. 3; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Zach, R., 1997 Numbers and Functions in Hilbert’s Finitism; Taiwanese Journal for Philosophy and History of Science 10, 33–60.
Zermelo, E., 1909 Sur les ensembles finis et le principe de l’induction complète; Acta Mathematica 32, 185–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sieg, W. (2009). Beyond Hilbert’s Reach?. In: Lindström, S., Palmgren, E., Segerberg, K., Stoltenberg-Hansen, V. (eds) Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism. Synthese Library, vol 341. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8926-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8926-8_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8925-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8926-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)