Abstract
Business schools have to go through radical changes in order to educate competent leaders in a complex and dynamic world. This article argues six strategic choices that business schools might con-sider. These choices imply (1) dedicated degree programs for different target groups; (2) integrated knowledge of the economic, social and biophysical context of business processes; (3) anchoring of education in the future societal context where students will be employed; (4) focus at the development of creative, emphatic and analytical faculties within managers; (5) development of intercultural compe-tence and (6) contribution to community development by means of life long learning.
The implementation of each of these choices may take place at several levels. This article investigates the level of the choices made within 25 business schools. In all cases, schools foresee higher levels of implementation in the near future due to approved innovation plans. This applies most for decisions with regard to the content of the curriculum (dedicated programs, integrated knowledge, integration theory and practice) and less to the societal role of the school (personality of managers, intercultural competence and contribution to lifelong learning).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babüroglu, O. N. & Emery, M. (2000). Educational Futures: Shifting Paradigm of Universities and Education. Istanbul: Sabanci University Press.
Baets, W. (1998). Organizational Learning and Knowledge Technologies in a Dynamic Environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R and D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.
Barrows, H. S. & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer Pub. Co.
Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D. J., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: how do we link. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: a Conservation (pp. 17–34). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennis, W. G. & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83, 196–204.
Borgnakke, K. (1999). Group work and learning processes: Viewed practically and analytically. In H. H. J. Salling Olesen, J. (Ed.), Project Studies, Alate Modern University Reform? Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
Boyatzis, R. E., Cowen, S. S., & Kolb, D. A. (1995). Innovation in Professional Education: Steps on a Journey from Teaching to Learning: The Story of Change and Invention at the Weatherhead, School of Management (1st ed.)., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Brown, J. Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Cabreta, Á., & Bowen, D. (2005). Professional global management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Management Development, 24(9), 791–806.
De Woot, P. (2005). Should Promotheus be Bound. Corporate Global Responsibility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: new implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: a Conservation (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eraut, M. (2003). Transfer of knowledge between education and the workplace. In H. P. A.Boshuizen (Ed.) Expertise Development: the Transition Between School and Work (pp. 55–73). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Gibbons, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge.The Dynamics of Science in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Gijselaers, W. & Wilkerson, L. (1996). Bringing Problem-based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gijselaers, W., Arts, J., Boshuizen, E., & Segers, M. (2006). When Graduates Enter the Workplace: Trade-Offs Between Formal and Dynamic Knowledge. Unpublished manuscript, Maastricht.
Grey, C. & Mitev, N. (2004). Management education; a polemic. In C. Grey & E. Antonacopoulou, (Eds.) Esential Readings in Management Learning (pp. 151–166). London: Sage Publications.
Hayes, R. H. & Abernathy, W. J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review (July–August), 67–77.
Howe, I. S. & Martin, G. (1998). Internationalisation strategies for management education. Journal of Management Development, 17 (6), 447–462.
Khurana, R., Nohria, N., & Penrice, D. (2005). Management as a profession. In J. W. Lorsch, L. Berlowitz, & A. Zelleke (Eds.), Restoring Trust in American Business. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kjearsdam, F. & Enemark, S. (1994). The Aalborg Experiment. Project Innovation in University Education. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Kostera, M. (1995). The modern crusade: when the missionaries of modern management come to eastern Europe. Management Learning, 26(3), 331–352.
Laszlo, K. C. (2001). The Evolution of Business Learning, Innovation and Sustainability in ther 21th Century. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Conference of The International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), Asilomar, California.
Lee, G. L. & Smith, C. (1992). Engeneers in Management,International Comparison. London and New York: Routledge.
Lorange, P. (2005). Strategy means choice: also for today's business school! Journal of Management Development, 24(9), 783–790.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organization: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBA's; A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Nattrass, B. & Altomare, M. (1999). The Natural Step for Business. Wealth, Ecology, and the Evolutionary Corporation. Gabriola Island BC: British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
Pfeffer, J. & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of the business schools? Less success then meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78–95.
Savery, J. R. & Duffy, T. M. (1996).Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 135–150). Euglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Press.
Shenton, G. (2002). The Designation of Master's Degree Titles in Management Education in Europe. Brussels: European Foundation of Management Development.
Van den Bosch, H. M. J. & Kieft, M. (2001). The hybrid curriculum; the acquisition of academic competencies in the University curriculum. In W. Gijselaers (Ed.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration, Part VII, (pp. 41–56), Dordrecht: Kluwer, Academic Press.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oacks, Cal.: Sage publications.
Welsh, A. & Lewis, M. (2004). Critical Pedagogy in the 'New Paradigm'. In C. Grey & E. Antonacopoulou (Eds.), Esential Readings in Management Learning, (pp. 167–186), London: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Participating Schools
Allen University | Columbia, South Carolina, USA |
Alytus College | Alytus, Lithuania |
Bergen University College | Bergen, Norway |
Canisius College | Buffalo, New York, USA |
Cass Business School, City of London | London, United Kingdom |
Copenhagen Business School | Frederiksberg, Denmark |
Department of Information Technologies, Sofia University | Sofia, Bulgaria |
Durham University Business School | City of Durham, United Kingdom |
ESCP-EAP | Paris, France |
Fach Hochschule Bielefeld | Bielefeld, Germany |
FHW/FH-Studiengänge der Wirtschaft | Wien, Austria |
INHOLLAND University | Rotterdam, Tthe Netherlands |
London Metropolitan University | London, United Kingdom |
Maastricht University, Faculty Economics and Business Administration | Maastricht, tThe Netherlands |
Open University, School of Management | Heerlen, Tthe Netherlands |
Sultan Qaboos University | Muscat, Oman |
Superior School of Management of Troyes | Troyes, France |
The Hotelschool The Hague | The Hague, Tthe Netherlands |
Turku University of Applied Sciences | Turku, Finland |
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya | Barcelona, Spain |
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs | Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA |
Valparaiso University Utah | Valparaiso, Indiana, USA |
Via Nova Academy | Epe, Tthe Netherlands |
Virginia Commonwealth University | Richmond, Virginia, USA |
Appendix 2: Ratings for Implementation Levels of Strategic Choices
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosch, H.d. (2008). A Strategy for Business Education in a Changing World. In: Barsky, N.P., Clements, M., Ravn, J., Smith, K. (eds) The Power of Technology for Learning. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8747-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8747-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8746-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8747-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)