Science Advocacy: Challenging Task, Difficult Pathways

Abstract

The practice of scientists acting as advocates in their own political cause is a relatively recent one around the world. The primary cause of their advocacy is their desire to maintain or increase funding. Despite a natural reluctance to undertake lobbying activities, science has learned that it must engage with policymakers if it wishes to maintain its influence and funding. The chapter details a number of the formal and informal methods science has used, drawing examples from the United States, Britain, Australia and Canada. It charts the emergence of science advisers to governments, either as individuals or committees. It looks at the formation of advocacy groups, and contrasts their strategy and activities with lobby groups representing non-science interests. The paper concludes that advocacy is not always a natural and easy course for scientists, but one they must undertake. The voice of science advocacy is not strong, but it is there.