Skip to main content

The Sceptical Evaluation of Technê and Baconian Science

  • Chapter
Renaissance Scepticisms

Part of the book series: International Archives of the History of Ideas ((ARCH,volume 199))

ČWho yet knows how far and to what discoveries this invention may be improved?č This question regarding the magnet, asked by a sceptical member of the Royal Society, Joseph Glanvill, is key to understanding how scepticism about a metaphysical type of knowledge was combined with belief in a new way through which knowledge could develop. These two positions merge into what could be called Čthe technological turnč in early modern science. Given the lack of an answer to his question, Glanvill claims, ČThe Royal Society, by their Care and Endeavors in the using this Instrument [the magnet], give us hopes, that they will let none of its useful Applications to escape us.č1

This paper analyses how early modern science combined scepticism and belief in the advancement of knowledge. We consider two questions: How did a sceptical perspective help to legitimise a practical shift in natural philosophy? And how was Francis Bacon, one of the main proponents of this shift, connected to the early modern history of scepticism? We argue that Francis Bacon's work was an important step in the transition from the Renaissance scepticism developed by Sanchez, Montaigne and Charron to the mitigated and constructive scepticism of Wilkins, Boyle and Glanvill. We hold, against Richard H. Popkin and Henry G. van Leeuwen, that Bacon should not be placed in the company of those such as Descartes who tried to refute scepticism and establish a new certain science; and that the mitigated or constructive scepticism held by the early members of the Royal Society, Glanvill in particular, has Bacon as one of its sources and therefore that there is no inconsistency in Boyle and Glanvill's holding a kind of mitigated scepticism and, at the same time, taking Bacon as their main patron in natural philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bacon, F. 1963. The works of Francis Bacon, eds. R.L. Ellis, J. Spedding, and D.D. Heath, 14 vols. (London, 1857–1874). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. Jr. 1996. Measures of science. Theological and technological impulses in early modern thought. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univevrsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. 1963. Francis Bacon: the temper of a man. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Daubert. 1982. Charron et l'Angleterre. Recherches sur le XVIIe Siècle 5: 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charron, P. 1986. De la sagesse. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.L. 1980. Some historical remarks on the Baconian conception of probability. Journal of the History of Ideas 41: 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doeuff, M. ed. 1995. Introduction. Francis Bacon, La Nouvelle Atlantide, 7–75. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, B. 1964. The philosophy of Francis Bacon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. 2002. Sextus Empiricus. The transmission and recovery of Pyrrhonism. Studies in Classical History and Society, Vol. 46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funkestein, A. 1987. Scholasticism, scepticism and secular theology. In Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, eds. Popkin, R., and C.B. Schmitt, 51–84. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, S. 2001. Francis Bacon and the transformation of early-modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanvill, J. 1970. Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation (facsimile to 1676 publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanvill, J. 1978. Scepsis Scientifica. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation (facsimile of the 1665 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granada, M. 1982. La Reforma Baconiana del Saber: Milenarismo Cientificista, Magia, Trabajo y Superación del Escepticismo. Teorema 12: 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, R. 1995. The sceptics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, M. 1995. ‘Be sober and reasonable’: the critique of enthusiasm in the seventeenth and early eightheenth centuries. New York: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. 1974. Knowledge and the known. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, M. 1973. In defence of Francis Bacon: a criticism of the critics of the inductive method. Studies in the History and Philosophy or Science 4: 241–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, W. 1988. Social change and epistemic thought. In Scientific knowledge socialized, eds. Hronsky, I. et al., 165–178. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, H.G. Van. 1963. The problem of certainty in English thought 1630–1690. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowith, K. 1968. Verum et Factum Convertuntur. In Omaggio a Vico, 94. Napoli: Morano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maia Neto, J.R. 1997. Academic scepticism in early modern philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas 58: 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maia Neto, J.R. 2002. Scepticisme, Cartésianisme et Religion chez Glanvill et Huet. Annuaire de l'école Pratique des Hautes Études — Section des Sciences Religieuses 2000 – 2001 109: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maia Neto, J.R., and E.C. Pereira Maia. 2002. Boyle's Carneades. Ambix 49: 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcondes, D. 1998. Scepticism and language in early modern thought. Language &Communication 1: 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. 1992. Francis Bacon, the state, and the reform of natural philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, A. 1972. Humanism and the rise of science in Tudor England. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. 1997. Foundations of Valerius Terminus. Journal of History of Ideas 5: 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondolfo, R. 1971. Il Verum Factum Prima di Vico. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne, M. 1991. The complete essays (trans: by Screech M. A.). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, P.-F. ed. 2001. Le Scepticisme au XVIe et au XVIIe Siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, B.J. 2002. Francis Bacon e a Fundamentação da Ciência como Tecnologia. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, M. ed. 1996. The Cambridge companion to Bacon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Ramoz, A. 1985. Bacon in the right spirit. Annals of Science 42: 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Ramoz, A. 1988. Francis Bacon idea of science and the maker's knowledge tradition. Oxford: Alden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Ramoz, A. 1993. Francis Bacon and man's two-faced kingdom. In The Renaissance and the seventeenth century rationalism, ed. Parkinson, G. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittion, J.-P. 1987. Scepticism and medicine in the Renaissance. In Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, eds. Popkin, R., and C.B. Schmitt, 103–132. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, R. 1992. The third force in seventeenth-century thought. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, R. 2003. The history of scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1st edition Van Gorcum 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, R., and C.B. Schmitt eds. 1987. Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. 1981. An unpublished manuscript by Francis Bacon: Sylva Sylvarum drafts and other working notes. Annals of Science 28: 377–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. 1984. Francis Bacon's natural philosophy: a new source. London: The British Society for the History of Science. Monographs 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. ed. 2000. Introduction, notes, commentaries, to Bacon's The Instauratio Magna. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. 1970. Philosophy, technology, and the arts in the early modern era. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • SÁ, A. 1947. Francisco Sanches, filósofo e matemático. Tese. Universidade de Lisboa. Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, F. 1988. That nothing is known (trans: Douglas Thomson). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The invention of autonomy: a history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus. 1933. Outlines of Pyrrhonism (trans: Bury, R.G). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus. 1949. Against the professors (trans: Bury, R.G.). The Loeb Classical Library. Vol. IV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Julie R. 1998. Objectivity in the making. Francis Bacon and the politics of inquiry. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, H. 1671. The Lord Bacons Relation to the Sweating-Sickness Examined, in a Reply to George Thomson, also, a Relation Concerning the Strange Symptomes Rappening upon the Bite of an Adder, and, a Reply by Way of Preface to the Calumnies of Eccebolius Glanvile. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmor, S. 1981. Glanvill: the uses and abuses of scepticism. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetel, M. 1987. Journal de Voyage de Italie. In L'Invention au XVI e Siècle, ed. Dubois, C.-G, 185–195. Talence: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux. Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, P. 1987. Francis Bacon's philosophy of science: an account and a reappraisal. Chicago, IL, La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vert, F. 1986. Notes et Commmentaire. In Le Valerius Terminus (ou de l'Interprétation de la Nature) ed. Bacon, F. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. 1994. Francis Bacon: select works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villey, P. 1913. Montaigne et Bacon. Revue de la Renaissance 5: 80–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiley, M. 1966. Creative sceptics. London: George Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorin, P. 1998. Francis Bacon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. 1928. The development of Bacon's essays and Montaigne. Journal of English and Germanic Philology. 27: 496–519.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliveira, B.J., Neto, J.R.M. (2009). The Sceptical Evaluation of Technê and Baconian Science. In: Paganini, G., Neto, J.R.M. (eds) Renaissance Scepticisms. International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 199. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8518-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics