Skip to main content

New Online Learning Technologies: New Online Learner Competencies. Really?

  • Chapter
Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape

Part of the book series: Lifelong Learning Book Series ((LLLB,volume 12))

Numerous organizations contend that online learning is different from learning in a classroom and that to be successful online it is essential to possess specific skills and characteristics. On the other hand, several studies comparing online and face-to-face learning argue that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of both learning modes, thus suggesting that there may not be a significant difference either in the competencies required to get the same results whether learning online or face-to-face. The usual question is, are the online learner competencies different from those of the face-to-face learner? Our belief is that this is the wrong question. Rather, we argue, the specific set of competencies required in any setting for a particular learning event is driven by the strategy of the event, not whether it is online or face-to-face. Our analysis is based on the characteristics and skills of the online learner as described by the hints and tips some higher education organizations offer to their target public to become successful online learners. Given that most online learning now imitates classroom instruction, it is likely that the new competencies required specifically for online learning, if any, have not yet emerged. We suggest that three factors, the use of technology, the degree of collaboration, and the extent to which students or the instructor manage the use of time are far more important determinants of the competencies required than whether a class is online or face-to-face. We invite the reader to consider other factors to further explore the topic, believing that a clearer understanding of the online learner competencies will produce more informed choices and, consequently, more effective interventions in online learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2003). Seizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002–2003. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education. Retrieved September 12, 2007 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/ survey/pdf/sizing_the_opportunity.pdf.

  • Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (Chap. 2). Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/index.html.

  • Arnold, L. (2006). Understanding and promoting autonomy in UK online higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 3(7), n.p. Retrieved September 30, 2007, from http://itdl.org/Journal/Jul_06/article03.htm.

  • Bouchard, P. (2003). Four dimensions of learner autonomy. Retrieved September 30, 2007, from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/CASAE/cnf2003/2003_papers/paulbouchard-2CAS03eng.pdf.

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockband, A., & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. A, & Miller, D. E. (2007). The active learner: Successful study strategies (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheetham, G., & Chivers, G. (2005). Professions, competence and informal learning. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2005). Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Community Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ComputerSchools.com (2001). Tips and strategies for the successful online student. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.computerschools.com/interviews/elearning/.

  • Creswell, C., Schwartzmyer, N., & Srihari, R. (2007). Information extraction for multi-participant, task-oriented, synchronous, computer-mediated communication: a corpus study of chat data. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-2007 workshop on analytics for noisy unstructured text data (pp. 131–138). Retrieved September 12, 2007 from http://research.ihost.com/and2007/cd/Proceedings_files/p131.pdf.

  • De la Teja, I. (2005, October). Reflections on the online learner competencies. In J. Visser (Chair), Presidential Workshop and Panel Session on Learners in a changing learning landscape: New roles and expectations—A dialogue motivated by an ibstpi research project. International Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Orlando, FL, October 15–18, 2005. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from www.learndev.org/dl/ibstpi-AECT2005-DeLaTeja.pdf.

  • Do Nacimento, H. D. (2005). User hints: A guide to interactive optimization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 21(7), 1177–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eLearning Guild (2005). 834 Tips for successful online instruction. eLearning Guild. Retrieved on September 12, 2007 from http://www.elearningguild.com/content.cfm?selec tion = doc.541.

  • Gardner, R. III., Heward, W., & Grossi, T. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, M. A, Tondora, J., & Marrelli, A. F. (2005), The fundamentals of workforce competency: Implications for behavioral health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 32(5), 509–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hseih, W. -L., Smith, B. K., & Stephanou, S. E. (2004). It is more about telling interesting stories: Use explicit hints in storytelling to help college students solve ill-defined problems. ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED485034. Retrieved September 30, 2007, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/a7/21.pdf.

  • Illinois Online Network (2007). Illinois online network: Supporting online education throughout the world. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.ion.illinois.edu/ resources/tutorials/pedagogy/tips.asp.

  • International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction (n.d.). Web site of the international board of standards for training, performance and instruction (ibstpi). Retrieved September 30, 2007, from www.ibstpi.org.

  • Jennings, L. (1991, November). A critical analysis of the competency-based approach in education and training. Paper presented at The National Conference of Australian Association for Research in Education, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ka márová, A. (2005). Internet chatting inside out. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2(1), 55–84. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL02/05.pdf.

  • Kassop, M. (2003). Ten ways online education matches, or surpasses, face-to-face learning. The Technology Source, May/June. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://technologysource.org/article/ten_ways_online_education_matches_or_surpasses_facetoface_learning.

  • Kerka, S. (1998). Competency-based education and training: Myths and realities. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.calpro-online.org/eric/docgen.asp?tbl = mr&ID = 65.

  • Kierstead, J. (1998). Competencies and KSAOs. Retrieved March 12, 2008 from http://www.psagency-agencefp.ca/research/personnel/comp_ksao_e.pdf.

  • Kizlik, R.J. (2007). Monster learning skills. Retrieved Sept. 12, 2007 from http://www.adprima.com/MLS/mlsinfopage.htm.

  • Klein, J. D., Spector, M. J., Grabowski, B., & De la Teja, I. (2004). Instructor competencies: Standards for face-to-face, online, and blended settings. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994) Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., Lerner, D., & Pool, I. de S. (1952). The comparative study of symbols: An introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucia, A., & Lepsinger, R. (1999). The art and science of competency models: Pinpointing critical success factors in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmolejo, E., Wilder, D., & Bradley, L. (2004). A preliminary analysis of the effects of response cards on student performance and participation in an upper division university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(3), 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrelli, A. (2001). Introduction to competency modeling. New York: American Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masie, E. (2004). 701 eLearning tips. The Masie center. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.masie.com/701tips/book/701_e-Learning_Tips.pdf.

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for ‘intelligence.’ American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. (2004). Computer literacy skills for computer information systems majors: A case study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, P. (1997). Competencies: The next generation. Training and Development Journal, 51(5), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher education report, Volume 29, Number 4. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirabile, R. (1997). Everything you wanted to know about competency modeling. Training and Development Journal, 51(8), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R. (1994). The media effects question: Unresolveable or asking the right question. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42(2), 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenya, J., Annand, D., & Wang, E. (2004). Supporting asynchronous discussions among online learners. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (Chap. 13, pp. 319–348). Alberta, Canada. Athabasca University. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch13.html.

  • Nolan, P. (1998). Competencies drive decision making. Nursing Management, 29(3), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, G., Ricciardi-Rigault, C., De la Teja, I., & Paquin, C. (1997). Le Campus Virtuel: Un réseau d’acteurs et de resources (The virtual campus: A network of actors and resources). Revue de l’Association canadienne d’éducation à distance/Canadian Association for Distance Education, 12(1–2), 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2000). Instructional design competencies: The standards. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (2001). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Montgomery, Alabama: IDECC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, M. S. (2006). Overcoming the “No Significant Difference” phenomenon in distance education by internet. 2nd International Open and Distance Learning Symposium. Anadolu University, Turkey. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.aof.edu.tr/iodl2006/ Proceedings/book/papers/paper_16.pdf.

  • Slaidinis, I. (2004). Guide des bonnes pratiques à l’usage des acteurs du e-Learning (Best practices guide for actors in e-Learning). European Center of Excellence for e-Learning. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://conseil-recherche-innovation.net/download/EEE/Guide%20de%20bonnes%20pratiques%20%C3%A0%20l’usage%20des%20acteurs%20du%20e-learning.pdf.

  • Spector, J. M., & De la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. Eric clearing house on information and technology. Syracuse, ED456841. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2002–2/teaching.htm.

  • Tang, B. A. (2000). 10 Tips to optimize your e-Learning. Learning Circuits, ASTD. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2000/ nov2000/nov2000_elearn.html.

  • University of Guelph (2006). Open online: Online distance education at the University of Guelph. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.open.uoguelph.ca/online/online _learning/for_you.cfm.

  • Usuki, M. (2003) Learner beliefs about language learning and learner autonomy: A reconsideration. In A. Barfield & M. Nix (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy in Japan 1: Autonomy you ask! Tokyo: Learner Development Special Interest Group of the Japan Association of Language Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. (in this volume). Let the dialogue begin: An introduction. In J. Visser & M. Visser-Valfrey (Eds.), Learners in a changing learning landscape: Reflections from a dialogue on new roles and expectations (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volckaert-Legrier, O., & Bernicot, J. (2005). Le courrier électronique au collège: comparaison avec l’oral par téléphone et l’écrit traditionnel envoyé par fax (Email in college: Comparison with oral communication by telephone and traditional written communication by fax). Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.unice.fr/ LPEQ/Jetcsic/DOCUMENTS/JETCSIC%20Volckaert-legrier.pdf.

  • Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2000). Principles of pedagogy and evaluation for web-based learning. Educational Media International, 37(2), 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnakulasooriya, R., & Prichard, D. (2005). Hints really help! Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://relate.mit.edu/hints.pdf.

  • Watkins, R. (2005). Preparing learners for online success. Learning Circuits: ASTD. Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2005/sep2005/ watkins.htm.

  • Wayne County Community College District (2005). Is distance learning for you? Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.wcccd.edu/distance_learning/distance_learning.asp.

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Rogers, B. T. (1985). Comprehension monitoring: The neglected learning strategy. Journal of Developmental Education, 9(1), 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Nevada Community College (2007). Counseling services: Developing college study skills. Retrieved on September 12, 2007, from http://www.wnc.edu/studentservices/counseling/studyskills.php.

  • White, K. W., & Baker, J. D. (Eds.) (2004). The student guide to successful online learning: A handbook of tips, strategies, and techniques. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • WorldWideLearn (1999). Traits of successful online students: Is online learning for you? Retrieved September 12, 2007, from http://www.worldwidelearn.com/elearning-essentials/learning-online.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de la Teja, I., Spannaus, T.W. (2008). New Online Learning Technologies: New Online Learner Competencies. Really?. In: Visser, J., Visser-Valfrey, M. (eds) Learners in a Changing Learning Landscape. Lifelong Learning Book Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics