Skip to main content

Structural Bioinformatics in the Discovery of Novel Drugs

  • Chapter
Innovations in Chemical Biology

There have been extensive advancements in structural genomics during the last years, especially after the sequencing of the human genome. With the augment of computational power, the in silico systems afford detailed insights into the structure-function relationships (SFR). The in silico analysis includes, prediction, virtual-engineering and modeling of mechanism, stability, specificity, and protein-protein and protein-drug (small molecule ligands) interactions as well as screening of drug candidates, both in silico and in vitro . During the last two decades, in the post-genomic era, the number of sequence-known proteins has increased rapidly. Several of these are possible “ druggable ” targets. A large number of recent methods and tools for the structural bioinformatics and computational chemistry have been published which provide the means to exploit the wealth of new informatics in drug discovery approaches. Not surprisingly, the biopharmaceutical industry has been quick to recognize the benefits of these new maturities and starting to accept them. In this review, some of the recent methods discussed briefly concerning their aspects of docking, virtual screening and virtual library design in drug discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berman, H. M., Bhat, T. N., Bourne, P. E., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Weissig, H. and Westbrook, J., 2000, Nat. Struct. Biol., 7 Suppl, 957–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Chen, L., Yang, H. and Berman, H. M., 2003, Nucleic Acids Res.,31, 489–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Congreve, M., Murray, C. W. and Blundell, T. L., 2005, Drug Discov. Today, 10 (13), 895–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thiel, K. A., 2004, Nat. Biotech., 22(5), 513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blundell, T. L., 1996, Nature, 384, 6604 Suppl, 23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Altman, R. B. and Klein, T. E., 2002, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 42, 113–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I. and Rosato, A., 2006,J. Proteome Res., 5(1), 196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I., Luchinat, C. and Rosato, A., 2004, J. Proteome Res., 3(1), 21–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brive, L. and Abagyan, R., 2002, Ernst Schering Res. Found Workshop, 38, 149–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Altman, R. B. and Dugan, J. M., 2003, Methods Biochem. Anal., 44, 3–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Service, R. F., 2002, Science, 298 (5595), 948–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinemann, U., Bussow, K., Mueller, U. and Umbach, P., 2003, Acc. Chem. Res.,36(3), 157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rupp, B., 2003, Acc. Chem. Res.,36 (3), 173–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesley, S. A., Kuhn, P., Godzik, A., Deacon, A. M., Mathews, I., Kreusch, A., Spraggon, G., Klock, H. E., McMullan, D., Shin, T., Vincent, J., Robb, A., Brinen, L. S., Miller, M. D., McPhillips, T. M., Miller, M. A., Scheibe, D., Canaves, J. M., Guda, C., Jaroszewski, L., Selby, T. L., Elsliger, M. A., Wooley, J., Taylor, S. S.,Hodgson, K. O., Wilson, I. A., Schultz, P. G. and Stevens, R. C., 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99 (18), 11664–11669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blundell, T. L., Sibanda, B. L., Montalvao, R. W., Brewerton, S., Chelliah, V., Worth, C. L., Harmer, N. J., Davies, O. and Burke, D., 2006, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 361 (1467), 413–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ananthalakshmi, P., Samayamohan, K., Chokalingam, C., Mayilarasi, C. and Sekar, K., 2005, Appl. Bioinformatics, 4 (2), 141–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I. N. and Bourne, P. E., 2000, Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutcliffe, M. J., Haneef, I., Carney, D. and Blundell, T. L., 1987, Protein Eng.,1 (5), 377–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guex, N., 1999, Trends Biochem. Sci., 24, 364–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sali, A. and Blundell, T. L., 1993, J. Mol. Biol.,234, 779–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Venclovas, C., Zemla, A., Fidelis, K. and Moult, J., 2003, Proteins, 53,585–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sousa, S. F., Fernandes, P. A. and Ramos, M. J., 2006, Proteins, 65(1), 15–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alvesalo, J. K., Siiskonen, A., Vainio, M. J., Tammela, P. S. and Vuorela, P. M., 2006, J. Med., Chem. 49 (7), 2353–2356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T. E., 1982, J. Mol. Biol., 161, 269–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Apostolakis, J. and Caflisch, A., 1999, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen., 2 (2), 91–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulz-Gasch, T. and Stahl, M., 2003, J. Mol. Model. (online), 9(1),47–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. J., Murcko, M. A. and Walters, W. P., 1999, J. Med. Chem., 42 (25), 5100–5109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark, R. D., Strizhev, A., Leonard, J. M., Blake, J. F. and Matthew, J. B., 2002, J. Mol. Graph., Model. 20 (4), 281–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stahl, M. and Rarey, M., 2001, J. Med. Chem., 44 (7), 1035–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H. and Nussinov, R., 2002, Proteins, 47 (4), 409–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bissantz, C., Bernard, P., Hibert, M. and Rognan, D., 2003, Proteins, 50 (1), 5–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hird, N., 2000, Drug Discov. Today, 5 (8), 307–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hann, M. M., Leach, A. R. and Harper, G., 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41(3), 856–864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Teague, S. J., Davis, A. M., Leeson, P. D. and Oprea, T., 1999, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 38 (24), 3743–3748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Verdonk, M. L. and Hartshorn, M. J., 2004, Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel., 7 (4), 404–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McInnes, C., 2006, Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel., 9 (3), 339–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abagyan, R. and Totrov, M., 2001, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 5 (4), 375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kitchen, D. B., Decornez, H., Furr, J. R. and Bajorath, J., 2004, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3 (11), 935–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Alvarez, J. C., 2004, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8 (4), 365–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R. and Taylor, R., 1999, Rational Drug Design, Novel Methods and Practical Applications. ACS Symposium Series 719, 271–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rarey, M. and Lengauer, T., 2000, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design 20 (1), 63–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun, Y., Ewing, T. J., Skillman, A. G. and Kuntz, I. D., 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 12 (6), 597–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fejzo, J., Lepre, C. A., Peng, J. W., Bemis, G. W., Ajay, A., Murcko, M. A. and Moore, J. M., 1999, Chem. Biol., 6 (10), 755–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahlstrom, M. M., Ridderstrom, M., Luthman, K. and Zamora, I., 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45 (5), 1313–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Allu, T. K. and Oprea, T. I., 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model.,45 (5), 1237–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Alonso, H., Bliznyuk, A. A. and Gready, J. E., 2006, Med. Res. Rev.,26 (5), 531–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Oprea, T. I. and Matter, H., 2004, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8 (4), 349–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Oprea, T. I., 2002, Molecules, 7, 51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Aronov, A. M. and Bemis, G. W., 2004, Proteins, 57(1), 36–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmud Tareq Hassan Khan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khan, M.T.H., Sylte, I. (2009). Structural Bioinformatics in the Discovery of Novel Drugs. In: Şener, B. (eds) Innovations in Chemical Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6955-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics