Abstract
My claim in this article is that the 1950 paper in which Turing describes the world-famous set-up of the Imitation Game is much richer and intriguing than the formalist ersatz coined in the early 1970s under the name “Turing Test”. Therefore, doing justice to the Imitation Game implies showing first, that the formalist interpretation misses some crucial points in Turing’s line of thought and second, that the 1950 paper should not be understood as the Magna Chartaof strong Artificial Intelligence (AI) but as a work in progressfocused on the notion of Form. This has unexpected consequences about the status of Mind, and from a more general point of view, about the way we interpret the notions of Science and Language.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boden, M., ed., 1990, Introduction, in: The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brouwer, L. E. J., 1913, Intuitionism and formalism, Bulletin of the American MathematicalSociety20: 81–96.
Cantor, G., 1932, Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Miterläuternden Anmerkungen sowie mit Ergänzungen aus dem Briefwechsel Cantor-Dedekind, E. Zermelo, ed., Springer, Berlin.
Church, A., 1937, Review of Turing 1936, The Journal of Symbolic Logic2: 42–43.
Dupuy, J.P., 2000, The Mechanization of the Mind: On the Origins of Cognitive Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Feferman, S., 1987, Weyl vindicated: “Das Kontinuum” 70 years later, in: Temi e Prospettiva dellalogica e della filosofia della scienza contemporanea, CLUEB, Bologna, pp. 59–93.
French, R. M., 1990, Subcognition and the limits of the Turing Test, Mind99: 53–65.
Frege, G., 1884, Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Marcus, Breslau.
Gandy, R., 1988, The confluence of ideas in 1936, in: The Universal Turing Machine; a Half-Century Survey. R. Herken, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 55–111.
Girard, J.Y., 2001, Locus solum, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science11(3).
Gödel K., 1931, Über formal entscheidbare sätze der principia mathematica und verwandter systeme, Monatshefte für Math. Physik, 38: 173–198; reprinted in 1986, Gödel’s CollectedWorks, S. Feferman, et al., eds., 1: 144–195.
Guillaume, M., 1994, La logique mathèmatique en sa jeunesse : Essai sur l’histoire de la logique dans la première moitiè du vingtième siècle, in: Development of Mathematics 1900–1950. J. P. Pier, ed., Birkhaüser Verlag, Basel.
Hallett, M., 1994, Hilbert’s axiomatic method and the laws of thought, in: Mathematics and Mind, A. George, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 158–200.
Haugeland, J., 1985, Artificial Intelligence, the Very Idea, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hilbert, D., 1899, Grundlagen der Geometrie, Teubner, Berlin.
Hilbert, D., 1917, Axiomatisches denken, Mathematische Annalen78(1918): 405–415.
Hilbert, D., 1923, Die logischen grundlagen der mathematik, Mathematische Annalen88(1923): 151–165.
Hilbert, D., 1925, Über das unendliche, Mathematische Annalen95(1926): 161–190.
Hodges, A., 1988, Alan Turing and the Turing machine, The Universal Turing Machine, R. Herken, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–15.
Hodges, A., 1997, Turing: A Natural Philosopher, Phoenix, London.
Hofstadter, D. and Dennett, D., 1981, The Mind’s I, Basic Books, New York.
Lachterman, D. R., 1989, The Ethics of Geometry: A Genealogy of Modernity, Routledge, New York/London.
Lassègue, J., 1993, Le test de Turing et l’ènigme de la diffèrence des sexes, in: Les Contenants dePensèe, D. Anzieu et al., ed., Dunod, Paris, pp. 145–195.
Lassègue, J., 1996, What kind of Turing Test did Turing have in mind? Tekhnema; Journal ofPhilosophy and Technology3: 37–58; http://tekhnema.free.fr/contents3.html
Lassègue, J., 1998a, Turing, l’ordinateur et la morphogenèse”, La Recherche305(Jan): 76–77.
Lassègue, J., 1998b, Turing, Les Belles Lettres, Paris, published, (2003), as De la logique du mental à la morphogenèse de l’idèe, dossier Les constructivismes in: Intellectica, M. -J. Durand, ed., Paris; http://www.ltm.ens.fr/chercheurs/lassegue/travaux.html
Leiber J., 1991, An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Longo, G., 1999, The difference between clocks and Turing machines, in: Functional Models ofCognition, Kluwer, Boston, MA; http://www.di.ens.fr/users/longo/download.html
Longo, G., 2001, Laplace in Locus Solum (see Girard J. Y.); http://www.di.ens.fr/users/longo/download.html
Longo, G., 2005, The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics and its cognitive roots, in: Geometries of Nature, Living Systems and Human Cognition: New Interactions of Mathematicswith Natural Sciences, L. Boi, ed., World Scientific.
Longo, G., 2008, Laplace, Turing and the “Imitation Game”. In R. Epstein, G. Roberts and G. Beber, eds., Parsing the Turing Test, Springer, Dortrecht, The Netherlands.
McCulloch W. S. and Pitts W. H., 1943, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5: 115–133.
Michie, D., 1974, On Machine Intelligence, Wiley New York.
Peano, G., 1899, Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita, Augustae Taurinorum, ed., Bocca, Turin.
Penrose, R., 1989, The Emperor’s New Mind : Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws ofPhysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Poincarè, H., 1913, Dernières pensèes, Flammarion, Paris.
Riemann, B., 1854, Über die hypothesen, welche der geometrie zu grunde liegen, Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, in: Göttingen 13: 133–150; http://www.emis.de/classics/Riemann/Geom_OnlinePDF.pdf
Stewart, J., 2000, Teleology in biology, Tekhnema; Journal of Philosophy and Technology6: 14–33.
Turing, A. M., 1936, On computable numbers with an application to the Entscheidung’s problem, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society42: 230–265; reprinted in: R. O. Gandy and C. E. M Yates,eds., Collected Works of A. M. Turing, vol. 4, Mathematical Logic4: http://www.abelard.org/turpap2/tp2-ie.asp
Turing, A. M., 1939, Systems of logic based on ordinals, Proceedings of the London MathematicalSociety45(ser 2): 161–228; reprinted in: R. O. Gandy and C. E. M. Yates, , eds., CollectedWorks of A. M. Turing, vol. 4, Mathematical Logic4.
Turing, A. M., 1949, The word problem in semi-groups with cancellation, Annals of Mathematics52(2): 491–505; reprinted in: J. L. Britton, ed., Collected Works of A. M. Turing, vol. 2, PureMathematics2.
Turing, A. M., 1950, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind59(236): 433–460.
Turing, A. M., 1952, The Chemical basis of morphogenesis, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 237: 37–72; reprinted in: P. T Saunders, ed., Collected Works of A. M. Turing, vol. 3, Morphogenesis2: 1–36.
Wagner, P., 1994, Machine et pensèe: l’importance philosophique de l’informatique et del’intelligence artificielle, Doctoral thesis, Universitè Paris 1.
Weyl, H., 1918, Das Kontinuum: Kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis, Veit Verlag, Leipzig.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lassègue, J. (2009). Doing Justice to the Imitation Game. In: Epstein, R., Roberts, G., Beber, G. (eds) Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9624-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6710-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)