Abstract
Researchers have proposed that to foster epistemological development, students should engage in the discussion of controversial issues, conduct open-ended inquiry projects, discuss, and analyze ill-structured problems, work on group learning, peer interactions or so-called constructivist-based instructional activities. Clearly, the Internet-based learning environments contain rich information and a variety of perspectives and viewpoints for inquiry exploration or the debates of controversial issues. They also allow numerous ways of group learning and peer interactions, either synchronous or asynchronous. The purpose of this study was to investigate a group of Taiwanese high school students’ epistemological development by involving in some Internet-based inquiry learning activities in science. The students were asked to find more online information to explore scientific knowledge taught in science class further. Also, they were requested to search Internet information to resolve some controversial issues, and they were allowed some opportunities to participate in some online discussions and debates. Students’ standards of evaluating online information and their epistemological beliefs toward science were probed before and after the treatment instruction by using questionnaires. Through comparing the students’ responses, it was found that their judgmental standards of assessing online information became more sophisticated, and their epistemological beliefs toward science, in some aspects, were enhanced. Some of the findings were interpreted through a cultural lens. Future research issues were also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.
Bilal, D. (2000). Children’s use of the yahooligans! web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646–665.
Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s use of the yahooligans! web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52, 118–136.
Bilal, D. (2002). Children’s use of the yahooligans! web search engine: III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53, 1170–1183.
Braten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027–1042.
Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325–351.
Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Journal of Educational Research, 42, 697–726.
Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199–224.
Duell, O. K., & Schommer, M. (2001). Measures of people’s beliefs about knowledge and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 419–449.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for teaching and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353–383.
Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–55.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistemological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46, 731–768.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Rodriguez, L., & Cano, F. (2006). The epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and study orchestrations of university students. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 617–636.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559–580.
Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761–784.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & Pines, A. L. (Eds.), Cognitive structures and conceptual change (pp. 211–231). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Tsai, C. -C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473–489.
Tsai, C. -C. (1999a). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654–674.
Tsai, C. -C. (1999b). The progression toward constructivist epistemological views of science: A case study of the STS instruction of Taiwanese high school female students. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1201–1222.
Tsai, C. -C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, 193–205.
Tsai, C. -C. (2001a). The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its applications to Internet-based instruction in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 401–415.
Tsai, C. -C. (2001b). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in Internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 970–974.
Tsai, C. -C. (2004a). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of the Internet as an “epistemological” tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 525–536.
Tsai, C. -C. (2004b). Information commitments in web-based learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 105–112.
Tsai, C. -C., & Chuang, S. -C. (2005). The correlation between epistemological beliefs and preferences toward Internet-based learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 97–100.
Tsai, C. -C., & Liu, S. -Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.
Wu, Y. -T., & Tsai, C. -C. (2005). Information commitments: Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 374–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsai, CC. (2008). The Use of Internet-based Instruction for the Development of Epistemological Beliefs: A Case Study in Taiwan. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6595-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6596-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)