Abstract
The 1909 publication of G. H. Shull was the dawn of the modern era of maize breeding. Since that time maize has been unique as a major crop of the world and a very important species for basic research. Most of the knowledge from that research has been either worthless or inaccessible to maize breeding programs and actual improvement of maize. Recently, this relationship has changed and the connections between basic research and breeding have improved. The previous 10-15 years have been especially eventful with the advent of transgenic maize and DNA sequence information for maize germplasm. There is much to learn about the maize genome. Only a small fraction of the 30,000 to 60,000 genes and other sequences have functions assigned to them on the basis of direct experimentation. The advent of the genomics era of maize breeding, even at such an early stage, has clearly underlined our abilities to empirically assess all of the promising genetic options and questions that are raised by new sources of information. Field-based phenotyping and the prioritization of phenotyping have become much more important in the genomics era of maize breeding. The gains and pains of the initial decades of maize breeding have been well documented for some traits and production environments. But, with the exception of improved resistance to biotic and abiotic stress as a basis for genetic gains in grain yield, very little fundamental information and few validated mechanisms have been identified from that era. The next era of maize breeding should be fundamentally different in the sense that the strategies will rely more on a scientific method; consequently, some of the reasons for success or failure will be known and considered for devising more efficient methods of maize improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen JR, Lubberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:554–560
Armstrong CL (1999) The first decade of maize transformation: a review and future perspective. Maydica 44:101–109
Armstrong CL, Romero-Severson J, Hodges TK (1992) Improved tissue culture response of an elite maize inbred through backcross breeding, and identification of chromosomal regions important for regeneration by RFLP analysis. Theor Appl Genet 84:755–762
Armstrong CL, Parker GB, Pershing JC, Brown SM, Sanders PR, Duncan DR, Stone T, Dean DA, Deboer DL, Hart J, Howe AR, Morrish FM, Pajeau ME, Petersen WL, Reich BJ, Rodriguez R, Santino CG, Sato SJ, Schuler W, Sims SR, Stehling S, Tarochione LJ, Fromm ME (1995) Field evaluation of European corn borer control in progeny of 173 transgenic corn events expressing an insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Crop Sci 35:550–557
Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34:20–25
Betran FJ, Menz M, Banziger M (2004) Corn breeding. In: Smith CW, Betran FJ, Runge ECA, (eds) Corn: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Bogenschutz TG, Russell WA (1986) An evaluation for genetic variation within inbred lines maintained by sib-mating and self-pollination. Euphytica 35:403–412
Brodersen P, Voinnet O (2006) The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. Trends Plant Sci 22:268–280
Brouwer C, Bruce W, Maddock S, Avramova Z, Bowen B (2002). Suppression of transgene silencing by matrix attachment regions in maize: Dual role for the Maize 5′ ADH1 matrix attachment region. Plant Cell 14:2251–2264
Brunner S, Fengler K, Morgante M, Tingey S, Rafalski A (2005). Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell 17:343–360
Charles D (2001) Lords of the Harvest. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA
Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Xe Y, Armstrong CL (2004). Invited review: factors influencing agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 40:31–45
Ching A, Caldwell KS, Jung M, Dolan M, Smith OS, Tingey S, Morgante M, Rafalski A (2002) SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genetics 3:19
Clark R, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Quijada P, Doebley JF (2006) A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene, tb1, has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nature Gen 38:594–597
Coen E, Robbins TP, Almeida J, Hudson A, Carpenter R (1989) Consequences and mechanisms of transposition in Antirrhinum majus. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile genetic elements. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 413–436
Crosbie TM, Eathington SR, Johnson GR, Edwards M, Reiter R, Stark S, Mohanty RG, Oyervides M, Buehler RE, Walker AK, Dobert R, Delannay X, Pershing JC, Hall MA, Lamkey KR (2006) Plant breeding: past, present, and future. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: the Arnel R. Hallauer international symposium Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA
Davidson EH (2006) The regulatory genome. Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Elsevier, New York
Duvick DN (2005) Contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize. In: Sparks DN (ed), Advances in agronomy, Vol. 86, Academic Press, San Diego, CA pp 83–145
Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M (2004) Changes in performance, parentage, and genetic diversity of successful corn hybrids, 1930–2000. In: Smith CW, Betran FJ, Runge ECA (eds) Corn: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Eathington SR (2005) Practical applications of molecular technology in the development of commercial maize hybrids. Proceedings of the 60th annual corn and sorghum seed research conferences. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC
Edwards M, Johnson L (1994) RFLPs for rapid recurrent selection. In: “Proceedings of symposium on analysis of molecular marker data” Am Soc Hort Sci and CSSA, Corvallis, OR pp 33–40.
Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999) Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:1295–1301
Fu H, Dooner HK (2002) Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9573–9578
Gaut BS, Doebley JF (1997) DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:6809-6814
Gethi JG, Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Smith ME, Kresovich S (2002) SSR variation in important US maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 42:951–957
Haberer G, Young S, Bharti AK, Gundlach H, Raymond C, Fuks G, Butler E, Wing RA, Rounsley S, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Mayer KFX, Messing J (2005) Structure and architecture of the maize genome. Plant Physiol 139:1612–1624
Hamilton CM, Frary A, Lewis C, Tanksley SD (1996) Stable transfer of intact high molecular weight DNA into plant chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:9975–9979
Hammer G, Cooper M, Tardieu F, Welch S, Walsh B, van Eeuwijk F, Chapman S, Podlich D (2006). Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci 11:587–593
Holland, JB (2004) Implementation of molecular markers for quantitative traits in breeding programs – challenges and opportunities. In: Fischer T et al (eds) New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September–1 October 2004, www.cropscience.org.au
Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210
Jia Y, Swanson-Wagner R, Emrich S, DeCook R, Fu Y, Guo L, Borsuk L, Ashlock D, Nettleton D, Schnable P (2006) Widespread maize natural antisense transcripts are frequently located in UTR repeat regions and conserved in other cereal transciptome using strand-specific microarray hybridized with two maize inbreds In: Smith CW, Betrán J, Runge ECA, (eds). Poster 208. 48th Annual Maize Genetics Conference
Johnson GR (2004) Marker assisted selection. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews. Vol. 24 part 1, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 293–310
Kaeppler S (2004) Biotechnology: new horizons. In: Smith CW, Betran FJ, Runge ECA (eds) Corn: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ pp 399-425
Laird NM, Lange C (2006) Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies. Nature Rev Genet 7:385–394
Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP (2005) MicroRNA172 downregulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9412–9417
Lawrence CJ, Seigfried T, Brendel V (2005) The maize genetics and genomics database. The community resource for access to diverse maize data. Plant Physiol 138:55–58
Lee M (1995) DNA markers in plant breeding programs. Adv Agron 55:265–344
Lee M (1999a) Genomic technologies and plant breeding. In: MX dos Santos (ed) XVIII Reunion Latinoamericana del Maiz. International center for maize and wheat improvement, El Batan, Mexico, pp 95–114
Lee M (1999b) Towards understanding and manipulating heterosis in crop plants: can molecular genetics help? In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 185–194
Lee M (2006) The phenotypic and genotypic eras of plant breeding. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: the Arnel R Hallauer international symposium. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, I.
Lowe KS, Gordon-Kamm WJ (2004) Methods of use of LEC1 polynucleotides and polypeptides. United States Patent Application 20040016022
Maliga, P (2004) Plastid transformation in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 55:289–313.
Melchinger AE, Longin CF, Utz HF, Reif JC (2005) Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploid lines: quantitative genetic and selection theory for optimum allocation of resources. 41st Illinois Corn Breeders’ School, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp 8–21
Moreau L, Charcosset A, Gallais A (2004) Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize. Euphytica 137:111–118
Morrow D, Ma J, Fernandes J, Walbot V (2006) Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize. Poster 162. 48th Annual Maize Genetics Conference
Niebur WS, Rafalski JA, Smith OS, Cooper M (2004) Applications of genomics technologies to enhance rate of genetic progress for yield of maize within a commercial breeding program. In: Fischer T et al (eds) New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September–1 October 2004. www.cropscience.org.au
Openshaw S, Frascaroli E (1997) QTL detection and marker-assisted selection for complex traits in maize. Proceedings of the 52nd annual corn and sorghum research conference. American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC, pp 44–53
Osterman JC (1991) Transposition of Ac-2 in response to temperature. Maydica 36:147–151
Ow DW (2002) Recombinase-directed plant transformation for the post-genomic era. Plant Mol Biol 48:183–200
Perlak FJ, Fuchs RL, Dean DA, McPherson SL, Fischoff DA (1991) Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:3324–3328.
Pixley K, Beck D, Palacios N, Gunaratna N, Guimaraes PE, Menkir A, White WS, Nestel P, Rocheford T (2007) Opportunities and strategies for biofortified maize (in review)
Rafalski A (2002) Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:94–100
Ragot M, Lee M (2007) Marker Assisted Selection in maize: current status, potential, limitations, and perspectives from the private and public sectors. In: ElcioG (ed) Marker-assisted selection in agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), United Nations Rome, Italy, pp. 117–150.
Sablowski RWM, Meyerowitz EM (1998) Temperature-sensitive splicing in the floral homeotic mutant apetala3-1. Plant Cell 10:1453–1463
Salvi S, Tuberosa R (2005) To clone or not to clone plant QTLs: present and future challenges. Trends Plant Sci 10:297–304
Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Fengler K, Meeley R, Ananiev E, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, Niu X, Li B, Hainey CF, Rafalski A, Tingey SV, Tomes D, Miao G-H, Phillips RL, Tuberosa R (2007) Conserved non-coding genomic sequences controlling flowering time differences in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11376–11381
Segal G, Song R, Messing J (2003) A new opaque variant of maize by single dominant RNA-interference-inducing transgene. Genetics 165:387–397
Senior ML, Chin ECL, Lee M, Smith JSC, Stuber CW (1996) Simple sequence repeat markers developed from maize sequences found in the GENEBANK database: map construction. Crop Sci 36:1676–1683
Shi C, Wenzel G, Frei U, Lübberstedt T (2005) From genomics to functional markers in maize. Prog Bot 67:53–70
Shou H, Frame BR, Whitham SA, Wang K (2004) Assessment of transgenic events produced by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Breed 13:201–208
Shull GH (1909) The composition of a field of maize. Rep Am Breeders’ Assoc 4:296–301
Smith JSC, Smith OS (1992) Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv Agron 47:85–140
Smith OS, Hoard K, Shaw F, Shaw R (1999) Prediction of single-cross performance. In: Coors JG and Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI pp 277–285
Stam M, Belele C, Ramakrishna W, Dorweiler JE, Bennetzen JL, Chandler VL (2002) The regulatory regions required for B′ paramutation and expression are located far upstream of the maize b1 transcribed sequences. Genetics 162:917–930
Stemmer WPC (1994) DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: In vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91:10747–10751
Stromberg LD, Dudley JW, Rufener GK (1994) Comparing conventional early generation selection with molecular marker assisted selection in maize. Crop Sci 34:1221–1225
Swanson-Wagner R, Jia Yi, DeCook R, Borsuk L, Nettleton D, Schnable P (2006) All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:6805–6810
Syvanen AC (2001) Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 2:930–942
Torney F, Frame B, Wang K (2007) Maize. In: Pua EC, Davey MR Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry Transgenic Crops IV. Springer, Berlin, pp. 73–98
Troyer AF (2004) Persistent and popular germplasm in seventy centuries of corn evolution. In: Smith CW, Betrán J, Runge ECA (eds) Corn: origin, history, technology, and production Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 133–232
Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrels ME (2005) Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci 10:621–630
Wright DA, Townsend V, Winfrey RJ Jr, Irwin PA, Rajagopol J, Lonosky PM, Hall BD, Jondle MD, Voytas DF (2005) High-frequency recombination in plants mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Plant 44:693–705
Yu J, Buckler ES (2006) Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, M. (2007). Maize Breeding and Genomics: An Historical Overview and Perspectives. In: Varshney, R.K., Tuberosa, R. (eds) Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6297-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6297-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6296-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6297-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)