Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((CSBE,volume 95))

The disposition of abandoned frozen embryos remains a topic of intense discussion as pressure to sanction human embryonic destruction for stem cell research continues to build. Debates about “embryo adoption” have intensified as part of this discussion. A number of children have been born this way, and their presence serves to vividly remind us that each frozen embryo is not an anonymous grouping of cells, but a child with his or her own specific traits. These children also remind us how “unwanted” or “abandoned” embryos can be given other possible trajectories besides being discarded or destroyed for research. My aim in this paper, nonetheless, is to offer several interconnected reasons I believe embryo adoption is illicit and unlikely ever to be sanctioned by the Catholic Church. I also intend to briefly consider the related question of the fate of the many cryopreserved embryos currently in storage.

The core question under consideration revolves around the final step typically undertaken during the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, and whether that step of transferring an embryo into a woman’s uterus is morally licit. Some such as Tollefsen and Brown and Eberl in this volume, would argue that embryo transfer as part of the in vitro fertilization process is wrong, but not when it is carried out as a form of “rescue” or “adoption.” I believe such a view is internally inconsistent and will attempt to argue in this paper that embryo transfer of any kind involves the participants in a fundamentally disordered kind of action. The process of deriving moral conclusions can be complicated by the fact that grave and systematic violations of the moral law may have already preceded and conditioned the situation. We find ourselves today in the strikingly unnatural situation of routinely handling human embryos in a sterile laboratory setting, far removed from a woman’s womb. As a consequence, we have seen tremendous depersonalizing and objectifying forces skew the discussion about early embryonic life. It has become nearly routine to see scanning electron micrographs of early human embryos sitting on the point of a sewing pin, or being poked with micromanipulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pacholczyk, R.T. (2007). On the Moral Objectionability of Human Embryo Adoption. In: Brakman, SV., Weaver, D.F. (eds) The Ethics of Embryo Adoption and the Catholic Tradition. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6211-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6211-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6210-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6211-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics