Skip to main content

Under Vehicle Inspection with 3d Imaging

Safety and Security for Check-Point and Gate-Entry Inspections

  • Chapter
3D Imaging for Safety and Security

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 35))

Abstract

This research is motivated towards the deployment of intelligent robots for under vehicle inspection at check-points, gate-entry terminals and parking lots. Using multi-modality measurements of temperature, range, color, radioactivity and with future potential for chemical and biological sensors, our approach is based on a modular robotic “sensor brick” architecture that integrates multi-sensor data into scene intelligence in 3D virtual reality environments. The remote 3D scene visualization capability reduces the risk on close-range inspection personnel, transforming the inspection task into an unmanned robotic mission. Our goal in this chapter is to focus on the 3D range “sensor brick” as a vital component in this multi-sensor robotics framework and demonstrate the potential of automatic threat detection using the geometric information from the 3D sensors. With the 3D data alone, we propose two different approaches for the detection of anomalous objects as potential threats. The first approach is to perform scene verification using a 3D registration algorithm for quickly and efficiently finding potential changes to the undercarriage by comparing previously archived scans of the same vehicle. The second 3D shape analysis approach assumes availability of the CAD models of the undercarriage that can be matched with the scanned real data using a novel perceptual curvature variation measure (CVM). The definition of the CVM, that can be understood as the entropy of surface curvature, describes the under vehicle scene as a graph network of smooth surface patches that readily lends to matching with the graph description of the aprioriCAD data. By presenting results of real-time acquisition, visualization, scene verification and description, we emphasize the scope of 3D imaging over several drawbacks with present day inspection systems using mirrors and 2D cameras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Dickson, J. Li, Z. Zhu, A. Hanson, , E. Riseman, H. Sabrin, H. Schultz and G. Whitten, “Mosaic Generation for Under-Vehicle Inspection,” IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 251-256 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.A. Freiburger, W. Smuda, R.E. Karlsen, S. Lakshmanan and B. Ma, “ODIS the under-vehicle inspection robot: development status update”, Proc. of SPIE Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology V, Vol.5083, 322-335 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Autonomous Solutions Inc., “Spector: Under vehicle inspection system”, Product Brochure (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Smuda, E. Schoenherr, H. Andrusz, and G.Gerhart, “Deploying the ODIS robot in Iraq and Afghanistan”, in the Proceedings of SPIE Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Vol. 5804, 119-129, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Koschan, D. Page, J.-C. Ng, M. Abidi, D. Gorsich, and G. Gerhart, “SAFER Under Vehicle Inspection Through Video Mosaic Building,” International Journal of Industrial Robot, Vol.31, 435-442 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Albus, “A reference model architecture for intelligent systems design”, in An Introduction to Intelligent Autonomous Control, Kluwer Publishers, 27-56 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. WMD Response Guide Book, U. S Department of Justice and Louisiana State University, Academy of Counter-Terrorism Education.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Qian, D. Page, A. Koschan, and M. Abidi, “A ‘Brick’-Architecture-Based Mobile Under-Vehicle Inspection System,” Proc. of the SPIE Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, Vol. 5804, 182-190 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Blais, “Review of 20 years of Range Sensor Development,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, Vol.13(1), 231-240 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, T. Duchamp, J. McDonald, and W. Stuetzle, “Surface Reconstruction from Unorganized Points,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, Vol. 26(2), 71-78(1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Page, A. Koschan, Y. Sun, and M. Abidi, “Laser-based Imaging for Reverse Engineering,” Sensor Review, Special issue on Machine Vision and Laser Scanners, Vol.23(3),223-229 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.J. Besl and N.D McKay, “A Method for Registration of 3D Shapes,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 14(2), 239-56 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Turk and M. Levoy, “Zippered Polygon Meshes from Range Images”, Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 311-318 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. T. Hayes, A. Martinoli, and R. M. Goodman, “Distributed odor source localization”, IEEE Sensors, Vol. 2(3), 260-271 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Dorai and A. K. Jain, “COSMOS – A Representation Scheme for 3D Free-Form Objects,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 19, 1115-1130 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Arman and J. K. Aggarwal, “Model-based object recognition in dense range images,” ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 25(1), 5-43, (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. V. Vranic, “An Improvement of Rotation Invariant 3D Shape Descriptor Based on Functions on Concentric Spheres,” Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 3, 757-760 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Hetzel, B. Leibe , P. Levi, and B. Schiele, “3D Object Recognition from Range Images using Local Feature Histograms,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, 394-399 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Ohbuchi, T. Minamitani, and T. Takei, “Shape Similarity Search of 3D Models by using Enhanced Shape Functions”, Proc. of Theory and Practice in Computer Graphics, 97-104 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Körtgen, G. J. Park, M. Novotni, and R. Klein, “3D Shape Matching with 3D Shape Contexts,” Proc. of the 7th Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Khotanzad and Y. H. Hong, “Invariant image recognition by Zernike moments,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 12(5), 489-497 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Johnson and M. Hebert, “Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 21(5), 433-444 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Zhang and M. Hebert, “Harmonic Maps and Their Applications in Surface Matching,” Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, 524-530 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Besl, “Triangles as a primary representation: Object recognition in computer vision,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 994, 191-206 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Osada, T. Funkhouser, B. Chazelle, and D. Dobkin, “Shape Distributions,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 21(4), 807-832 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Surazhsky, E. Magid, O. Soldea, G. Elber, and E. Rivlin, “A comparison of gaussian and mean curvature estimation methods on triangle meshes,” Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1, 1021-1026 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Lin and M. J. Perry, “Shape description using surface triangulation,” Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision: Representation and Control, 38-43 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. W. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, UK (1986).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. M. P. Wand and M. C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing, Chapman and Hall, London (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, 379-423 (1948).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. A. P. Mangan and R. T. Whitaker, “Partitioning 3D surface meshes using watershed segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Visual Computer Graphics, Vol. 5(4), 308-321 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. L. G. Shapiro and G. C. Stockman, Computer Vision, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sukumar, S.R., Page, D.L., Koschan, A.F., Abidi, M.A. (2007). Under Vehicle Inspection with 3d Imaging. In: Koschan, A., Pollefeys, M., Abidi, M. (eds) 3D Imaging for Safety and Security. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6182-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6182-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6181-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6182-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics