Abstract
The article considers Jürgen Habermas’s views on the relationship between postmetaphysical philosophy and religion. It outlines Habermas’s shift from his earlier, apparently dismissive attitude towards religion to his presently more receptive stance. This more receptive stance is evident in his recent emphasis on critical engagement with the semantic contents of religion and may be characterized by two interrelated theses: (a) the view that religious contributions should be included in political deliberations in the informally organized public spheres of contemporary democracies, though translated into a secular language for the purposes of legislation and formal decision making and (b) the view that postmetaphysical philosophy should seek to salvage the semantic contents of religious traditions in order to supply the evocative images, exemplary figures, and inspirational narratives it needs for its social and political projects. With regard to (a), it argues that the translation requirement impairs the political autonomy of religious believers and other metaphysically inclined citizens, suggesting that this difficulty could be alleviated by making a distinction between epistemologically authoritarian and non-authoritarian religious beliefs. With regard to (b), it argues that the salvaging operation is not as straightforward as Habermas seems to suppose and that social and political philosophy may not be able to tap the semantic power of religious traditions without relying on metaphysical assumptions; it concludes that, here, too, a distinction between authoritarian and non-authoritarian approaches to knowledge and validity may be useful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cooke, M. (1994). Language and reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooke, M. (1999). A space of one’s own: Autonomy, privacy, liberty. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 25(1), 23–53.
Cooke, M. (2000). Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48(5), 947–969.
Cooke, M. (2001a). Socio-cultural learning as a ‘transcendental fact’: Habermas’s postmetaphysical perspective. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 9(1).
Cooke, M. (2001b). Critical theory and religion. In D. Z. Phillips & T. Tessin (Eds.), Philosophy of religion in the 21st century (pp. 211–243). London: Palgrave.
Cooke, M. (2005). Avoiding authoritarianism: On the problem of justification in contemporary critical social theory: International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13(3), 379–404.
Cooke, M. (2006a). Re-Presenting the good society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cooke, M. (2006b). Säkulare Übersetzung oder postsäkulare Argumentation? Habermas über Religion in der demokratischen Öffentlichkeit. In R. Langthaler & H. Nagl-Docekal (Eds.), Jürgen Habermas über Religion. Wien/Berlin: Oldenbourg Verlag.
Habermas, J. (1973). Wahrheitstheorien. In H. Fahrenbach (Ed.), Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Pfullingen: Neske.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1), trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2), trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1991). Transzendenz von innen, Transzendenz ins Diesseits. In Texte und Kontexte Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical thinking, trans. W. M. Hohengarten. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1993). On the pragmatic, the ethical, and the moral employments of practical reason. In Justification and application, trans. C. Cronin. (pp. 1–17) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy, XCll(3), 109–131.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1998). Questions and counter-questions. In On the pragmatics of communication, edited and with an introduction by M. Cooke (pp. 403–433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2000). A Genealogical analysis of the cognitive content of morality. In C. Cronin & P. de Greiff (Eds.), The inclusion of the other (pp. 3–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2002). Wann müssen wir tolerant sein? Über die Konkurrenz von Weltbildern, Werten und Theorien. Festvortrag zum Leibniztag der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (im Juni, 2002).
Habermas, J. (2003a). The future of human nature, trans. W. Rehg, M. Penksy, and H. Beister. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2003b). Faith and knowledge. In Habermas (2003a), 101–115.
Habermas, J. (2003c). Truth versus rightness: On the sense of normative validity in moral judgments and norms. In Truth and justification, trans. B. Fultner (pp. 237–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2003d). Are there postmetaphysical answers to the question: What is the ‘good life?’ In Habermas (2003a), 1–15.
Habermas, J. (2003e). To seek to salvage an unconditional meaning without God is a futile undertaking. In Justification and Application, trans. c. cronin (pp. 133–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2005a). Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2005b). Religion in der Öffentlichkeit. Kognitive Voraussetzungen für den öffentlichen “Vernunftgebrauch” religiöser und säkularer Bürger. In Habermas (2005a), 119–154.
Habermas, J. (2005c). Die Grenze zwischen Glauben und Wissen: zur Wirkungsgeschichte und aktuellen Bedeutung von Kants Religionsphilosophie. In Habermas (2005a), 216–257.
Habermas, J. (2005d). Zur Architektonik der Diskursdifferenzierung: kleine Replik auf eine grosse Auseinandersetzung In Habermas (2005a), 84–105.
Habermas, J. (2005e). Kulturelle Gleichbehandlung — und die Grenzen des modernen Liberalismus. In Habermas (2005a), 279–323.
Habermas, J. (2005f). Vorpolitische Grundlagen des demokratischen Rechtstaats. In Habermas (2005a), 94–96.
Habermas, J (2005g). Religiöse Toleranz als Schrittmacher kultureller Rechte. In Habermas (2005a), 258–278.
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment, trans. W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Kompridis, N. (1999). Heidegger’s challenge and the future of critical theory. In P. Dews (Ed.), Habermas: A critical reader (pp. 118–150). Oxford: Blackwell.
McCarthy, T. (1994). Kantian constructivism and reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in dialogue. Ethics, 105, 44–63.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism (pp. 47–66). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason revisited: The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807.
Smith, N. (1997). Strong hermeneutics: Contingency and moral identity (pp. 144–169) London: Routledge.
Wellmer, A. (1991a) Truth, semblance, reconcilation. In A. Wellmer, The persistence of modernity, trans. D. Midgely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wellmer, A. (1991b). Ethics and dialogue. In The persistence of Modernity (pp. 113–231).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooke, M. (2006). Salvaging and secularizing the semantic contents of religion: the limitations of Habermas’s postmetaphysical proposal. In: Long, E.T. (eds) Self and Other: Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5861-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5861-5_13
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5860-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5861-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)