Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Ia. Governance in Connected Arenas – Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems

  • Atkinson, M.M. / W.D. Coleman, 1992: Policy Networks, Policy Communities and the Problem of Governance, in: Governance 5, 154–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandemer, S., 2001: Benchmarking, in: Blanke, B. et al. (eds.), Handbuch der Verwaltungsreform, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 2nd. ed., 406–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., 1998: Postparlamentarische Demokratie? Demokratische Legitimation im kooperativen Staat, in: Greven, M.Th. (ed.), Demokratie – Eine Kultur des Westens?, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., 2003: Konstruktive Vetospieler in Mehrebenensystemen, in: Mayntz, R. / W. Streeck (eds.), Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden, Frankfurt, New York, Campus, 205–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., 2004a: Leistungswettbewerbe in der regionalen Raumentwicklungspolitik, in: DISP Dokumente und Informationen zur Schweizerischen Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung, Zürich, 4–10; (DISP-online http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/index.php/de/content/view/full/875/).

  • Benz, A., 2004b: Path-dependent Institutions and Strategic Veto-Players. National Parliaments in the European Union, in: West European Politics 29(5), 875–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A., 1996: Tipping the balance. autopoiesis and governance, in: Administration and Society 28(3), 299–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J., 1989: Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.M., 1992: Introduction. Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination, in: International Organization 1(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrom, P. / R. Swedberg (eds.), 1998: Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., 1999: Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Escaping Deadlock, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., 2002a: Introduction, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., 2002b: New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making without Legislating, in: idem (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. / I. Maher, 2001: The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance. The Case of Soft Economic Policy Coordination, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 39, 719–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D., 1999: Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., 1998: The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure. the Case of Economic Development, in: International Social Science Journal, 155, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., 2002: The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. / R. Eising (eds.), 1999: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, K. / N. Dose, 1993: Instrumente und Formen staatlichen Handelns, Köln et al., Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., 2002: Governance. A Socio-Political Perspective, in: Grote, J.R. / B. Gbikpi (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Benchmarking auf dem Prüfstand. Kosten, Nutzen und Wirkungen interkommunaler Leistungsvergleiche in Deutschland, in: Verwaltungsarchiv 94, 99–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, S. / U. Schimank, 2004: Einführung, in: Lange, S. / U. Schimank (eds.), Governance und gesellschaftliche Integration, Wiesbaden, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 9–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G., 1999: Verhandlungsdemokratie, Entscheidungsblockaden und Arenenverflechtung, in: Merkel, W. / A. Busch (eds.), Demokratie in Ost und West, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 402–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G., 2000: Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im Institutionengefüge der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütz, S., 2003: Governance in der politischen Ökonomie – zum Stand der Debatte, in: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 44, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, D. / R.W.A. Rhodes, 1992: Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., 1992: Interessenverbände und Gemeinwohl. Die Verbändestudie der Bertelsmann Stiftung, in: idem (ed.), Verbände zwischen Mitgliederinteressen und Gemeinwohl. Gütersloh, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., 1998: New Challenges to Governance Theory. Jean Monnet Chair Paper 50, Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute, Florenz, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., 2002: Common Goods and Governance, in: Héritier, A. (ed.), Common Goods. Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., 2003: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makrosozialer Aussagen, in: idem (ed.), Akteure – Mechanismen – Modelle, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Steuerung und Selbstorganisation in staatsnahen Sektoren, in: idem (eds .), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt a.M. / New York, Campus, 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.J. / T.M. Moe, 1986: The Positive Theory of Hierarchies, in: Weisberg, H. (ed.), Political Science. The Science of Politics, New York, Agathon Press, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nullmeier, F., 2000: Politische Theorie des Sozialstaats, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. / H. Wiesenthal, 1980: Two Logics of Collective Action. Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form, in: Political Power and Social Theory 1, 67–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (ed.), 2000: Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. / B.G. Peters, 2000: Governance, Politics and the State, London, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., 2004: Politics in Time. History, Institutions and Social Analysis, Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W., 1997: Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N., 1998: Governance and Democracy in a Globalizing World, in: Held, D. / A. McGrew (eds.), 2000: The Global Transformation Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate, Cambridge, Blackwell, 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. / E.-O. Czempiel (eds.), 1992: Governance Without Government. Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W., 1988: The Joint-Decision-Trap. Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in: Public Administration 66, 239–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W., 1997: Games Real Actors Play. Boulder / Col., Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W., 1999: Governing in Europe. Efficient and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. / B. Reissert / F. Schnabel, 1976: Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Kronberg, Scriptor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppert, G.F., 2000: Verwaltungswissenschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smismans, S., 2006: The Legitimacy of Functional Participation in European Risk Regulation: A Case Study of Occupational Health and Safety, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., 2002: Democratic Theory and Network Governance, in: Administrative Theory and Praxis 24(4), 693–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, K. / F. van Waarden, 2004: “Governance” as a Bridge between Disciplines. Cross-disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy, in: European Journal of Political Research 43, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. / M. Wright, 1987: Conclusion: Comparing Government-Industry Relations: States, Sectors and Networks, in: idem (eds.), Comparative Government-Industry Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 274–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K.-D., 2006: Private Actors and the Legitimacy of Governance Beyond the State Conceptional Outlines and Empirical Explorations, in: Benz, A. / Y. Papadopoulis (eds.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and Transnational Experiences, London, Routledge, 200–227.

    Google Scholar 

Ib. Governance of Research – Nine Comments on Arthur Benz

  • Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. / M. Benninghoff, 2003: Policy Learning in Swiss Research Policy. The Case of the National Centres of Competence in Research, in: Research Policy 32(10), 1849–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J. / S. Kuhlmann, 2005: Towards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies, in: Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 14(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, T. / S. Kuhlmann, 2007: Analysis of Heterogeneous Collaboration in the German Research System with a Focus on Nanotechnology, Chapter B IV in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemlin, S. / C.M. Allwood / B. Martin (eds.), 2004: Creative Knowledge Environment. The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, H.W. / U. Schimank, 1990: Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem. Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung, Frankfurt/M., Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, R., 2002: Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twenthieth-century Science. A Case of Excellence in Biomedical Research, Berlin, WZB Discussion Paper, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., 2003: Evaluation as a Source of “Strategic Intelligence”, in: Shapira, Ph. / S. Kuhlmann (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Elgar, 352–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., 2001: Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe. Three Scenarios, in: Research Policy 30, issue 6/01, 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. / F.W. Scharpf, 1995: Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus, in: idem (ed.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung, Frankfurt / New York, Campus, 39–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. / P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), 1991: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago / London, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R., 1995: Institutions and Organizations, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Blumenthal, J., 2005: Governance. Eine kritische Zwischenbilanz, in: Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 15(4), 1149–1180.

    Google Scholar 

Ic. Comment – An Organizational Economics View

  • Benz, A., 2007: Governance in Connected Arenas. Political Science Analysis of Coordination and Control in Complex Rule Systems, Chapter A Ia in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. / B.M. Kehm / J. Enders, 1999: Institutional Mechanisms of Problem Processing of the German University System. Status Quo and New Developments, in: Braun, D. / F.-X. Merrien (eds.), Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View, London et al., 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. / D. Sadowski, 2004: Performancemanagement in der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Eine unlösbare Aufgabe?, in: Die Verwaltung 37, 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittek, R., 2007: Governance from a Sociological Perspective, Chapter A IIIa in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benz, A., Kuhlmann, S., Sadowski, D. (2007). Governance – A Political Science Perspective. In: Jansen, D. (eds) New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics