Abstract
This paper explores the reasons why economic instruments of climate change are reluctantly applied and stresses the need for interdisciplinary research linking economic theory and empirical testing to deliberative political procedures. It is divided in three parts. The first one recalls the main issues in implementing Cost-Benefit Analysis such as information problems, uncertainties, discounting the future and irreversibilities. The second part shows how these issues can be treated in integrated assessment and techno-economic models and presents a case study, which shows that
-
The chosen scenario tends to stabilize atmospheric CO2 concentration at around 550 ppm in the long run.
-
Exclusion of possibility to trade CO2 emission permits under a cap regime would increase the cost of emission abatement for OECD countries.
-
Combining different flexibility instruments might lead to significant gains in the overall cost of climate policy.
The third part presents results of a survey conducted among the main economic and environmental associations in Switzerland. The survey reveals conflicting views on economic instruments. It shows how the social acceptability of these instruments can be improved in taking explicitly into account these opposing views of special interest groups. Therefore, policy scenarios should be selected in combining techno-economic models with empirical studies about their political and normative context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AEN-NEA (Nuclear Energy Agency) (2005) Projected costs of generating electricity — 2005 update. OECD-Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD/IEA. Paris, France
Anaheim HA (2002), Impacts of climate change in monetary terms? Issues for Developing Countries. In Baranzini A, Buergenmeier B (Guest Editors) Climate change: issues and opportunities for developing countries. Special Issue of the Int J Global Env Issues, November 2002, 2(3/4):223–239
Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York
Arrow KJ, Lind RC (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Am Econ Rev 60(3):364–378
Arrow KJ, Parikh, J, Pillet G (1996) Decision-Making Frameworks for addressing climate change, in IPCC, cit. below, pp 52–77
Bahn O, Drouet L, Edwards N, Haurie A, Kypreos S, Stocker T, Vial J-P (2006a) Optimal economic growth under climate change threats. Climatic Change, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9108-4, this issue
Bahn O, Edwards N, Knutti R, Stocker TF (2006b) Climate policy preventing an Atlantic thermohaline collapse. Climatic Change (submitted)
Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S (2000) A future for carbon taxes. Ecol Econ 32(3):395–412
Baranzini A, Chesney M, Morisset J (2003) The impact of possible climate catastrophes on global warming policy. Energy Policy 31(8):691–701
Barde JP (1997) Economic instruments for environmental protection: experience in OECD countries. in applying market-based instruments to environmental policies in China and OECD countries, Paris, OECD, pp 31–58
Buchanan J (1969) Cost and choice, an inquiry in economic theory. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Bürgenmeier B (1993) Ethical aspects of environmental protection. In: Vernet JP (ed), Environmental contamination, studies in environmental sciences, no. 55. Amsterdam, Londres, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier
Bürgenmeier B, Harayama Y, Wallart N (1997), Théorie et pratique des taxes environmentales, Economica, Paris
Bürgenmeier B (2003) Modelling equity: a debate about values, in Environment Modelling and Assessment, No 8, pp. 165–174
Bürgenmeier B, Ferrier C, Germond-Duret C, Ingold K, Perret S (2006) Acceptation des instruments de marché dans la politique climatique suisse: enquête auprès des principaux acteurs économiques suisses, forthcoming (see also Perret S (2004) “L’acceptabilité des instruments économiques dans le domaine de la politique climatique en Suisse: résultats préliminaires”, Working Paper, No WP4-25
Cropper M (2000) Has economic research answered the needs of environmental policy?. J Environ Econ Manag 39:328–350
Falk I, Mendelsohn R (1993) The economics of controlling stock pollutants: an efficient strategy for greenhouse gases. J Environ Econ Manag 25:76–88
Fankhauser S (1995) Valuing climate change. the economics of the greenhouse. Earthscan, London
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1994) The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 10:197–207
Henry C (1974) Investment decisions under uncertainty: the irreversibility effect. Am Econ Rev 64(6):1006–1012
Hettlage R (1993) Ökonomie auf dem Weg zur Sozialwissenschaft? Revue Suisse de Sociologie 19(1)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996) climate change 1995. economic and social dimensions of climate change. contribution of working group iii to the 2nd assessment report of the IPCC. WMO and UNEP, New York, Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) special report on emission scenarios, a special report of the working group iii. of intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (U.K.)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) climate change 2001: mitigation. contribution of working group iii to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press
Knutti R, Stocker TF, Joos F, Plattner G-K (2002) Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416:719–723
Loulou R, Goldstein G, Noble K (2004). Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP), October 2004
Maddison D (1995) A cost-benefit analysis of slowing climate change. Energy Policy 23(4/5):337–346
Manne AS, Richels RG (2005) Global climate decisions under uncertainty. a paper presented at annual meeting of the international energy workshop 2005, 5–7 July 2005 at the Pa-lu-lu Plaza Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
Mishan EJ (1980) How valid are economic evaluations of allocative changes? J Econ Issues XIV(1):143–161
National Research Council (2002), Abrupt climate change: inevitable surprises. The National Academics Press, Washington, DC
Nordhaus, WD (1993) Rolling the DICE: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Resou Energy Econ 15:27–50
Olson M (1971) Logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard Universty Press, revised edition, Cambridge (Mass.)
Rafaj P (2005): Analysis of policies contributing to sustainability of the global energy system using the global multi-regional MARKAL model (GMM), Ph.D. Thesis, Nr. 16122, ETH Zürich 2005
Rafaj P, Kypreos S, Barreto L (2005) Flexible carbon mitigation policies: Analysis with a global multiregional MARKAL model. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds), Coupling climate and economic dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 237–66
Rotmans J, van Asselt MBA (2002) Integrated assessment: current practices and challenges for the future. in Abaza H, Baranzini A (eds) implementing sustainable development. integrated assessment and participatory decision-making processes. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 78–116
Söderbaum P (2000) Ecological economics. Earthcan, London
Spash CL, Carter C (2001) Environmental valuation in Europe: findings from the concerted action, policy research brief, No 11, European Commission DG-XII, Cambridge Research for Environment (CRE)
Spash CL (2002) Greenhouse economics, value and ethics, Routledge, London
Thalmann, Ph (2001) The public acceptance of green taxes: two million voters express their opinion. NCCR — WP4 Working Paper 1
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): 1999, The Kyoto protocol to the convention on climate change, UNFCCC Climate Change Secretariat and UNEP, UNEP/IUC/99/10, Geneva, Switzerland
Vatter A (2002), Erfolgsfaktoren klimapolitischer Abstimmungsvorlagen, Büro Vatter
Viguier L, Barreto L, Haurie A, Kypreos S, Rafaj P (2006) Modelling endogenous learning and imperfect competition effects in climate change economics. Climatic Change, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9070-1, this issue
Wallart N (2000), The political economy of environmental taxes. Edgar Elgar, Cheltenham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bürgenmeier, B. et al. (2006). Economics of climate policy and collective decision making. In: Wanner, H., Grosjean, M., Röthlisberger, R., Xoplaki, E. (eds) Climate Variability, Predictability and Climate Risks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5714-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5714-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5713-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5714-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)