Abstract
It has been said that, even if human reproductive cloning become some day a safe and secure procedure, a clone would suffer some sort of harm. This assertion obviously depends on the way the concept of harm is defined. It is argued that someone is harmed when living in a condition that is harmful, no element of comparison with a previous unharmed condition being required. It is concluded that a clone would not suffer any ontological or existential harm; but it would certainly suffer some psychological distress, resulting from irrational expectations on it
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayertz K (1994) Genethics. Technological intervention in human reproduction as a philosophical problem, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [1987].
Brock DW (1998) Cloning human beings: an assessment of the ethical issues pro a nd con. In: Nussbaum MC, Sunstein CR (eds) Clones and clones. Facts and fantasies about human cloning. W.W. Norton, New York-London, pp 141–164.
Callahan D (1997) Cloning: The work not done. The Hastings Center Report 27(5):18–20.
Chadwick R (1982) Cloning. Philosophy 57:201–209.
Evers K (1999) The identity of clones. J Med Philos 24(1):67–76.
Feinberg J (1984) Harm to others. The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York.
Feinberg J (1986) Harm to self. The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford University Press, New York
Feinberg J (1992) The child’s right to an open future. In Freedom and fulfilment. Philosophical essays. Princeton University Press, Princeton [1980], pp 76–97.
Harris J (1993) Wonderwoman and superman. The ethics of human biotechnology. Oxford University Press paperbacks, Oxford, NY [1992].
Jonas H (1966) The phenomenon of life. Toward a philosophical biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Jonas H (1973) Biological Engineering – A Preview. In Philosophical essays From ancient creed to technological man. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp 141–167.
Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & londres, 1984 [1981].
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1998) Cloning human beings. In: Pence G (ed) Flesh of my flesh. The ethics of cloning humans, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 45–65.
Pence G (1998) Introduction in: Pence G (ed), Flesh of my Flesh. The ethics of cloning humans, IX–XV, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
Ramsey P (1970) Fabricated man. The ethics of genetic control, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Robertson JA (1994) The question of human cloning. Hastings Center Report 24(2):6–14.
Robertson JA (1998) Liberty, identity, and human cloning. The Tex Law Rev 76(6):1371–1456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goffi, JY. (2007). The Harm of Being a Clone. In: Fagot-Largeault, A., Rahman, S., Torres, J.M. (eds) The Influence of Genetics on Contemporary Thinking. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5664-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5664-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5663-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5664-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)