Skip to main content

Stakeholder-driven, enquiry-driven, or stakeholder-relevant, enquiry-driven science?

  • Chapter
Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change
  • 1917 Accesses

Abstract

There is currently debate within the international hydrological community on whether hydrological science should give priority to providing measurements, knowledge, and understanding pre-determined as being needed by stakeholders, or priority to more basic enquiry-driven science that will stimulate the continued health and growth of hydrology as an important Earth science discipline. Two recent major international initiatives in hydrology reflect these two perspectives. One, the Hydrology for the Environment, Life, and Policy (HELP) program, is primarily fostered by UNESCO-IHP and is focused on stimulating the stakeholder-driven hydrological science required in specific catchments that have become members of a global network. The second, the decade on Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), which is appropriately managed by IAHS, is primarily driven by scientific enquiry and is focused on creating new scientific methods and understanding, albeit with practical application ultimately in mind. This paper summarizes the nature, origins, growth, and progress of these two international programs but also describes the subtly different approach that has been adopted by the U.S. National Science Foundation’s (NSF’s) Center for Sustainability of semi-Arid Hydrology and Riparian Areas (SAHRA). NSF is a federal agency whose primary goal is to “enable the future” by stimulating novel science. Because SAHRA is a federally-funded entity supported by an agency with this goal, the Center clearly cannot operate in stakeholder-driven, response mode in competition with the already effective private U.S. consultancy industry. Nonetheless, SAHRA’s mission is to create knowledge and build understanding that will enhance the prospects of sustainable water management in semi-arid regions, especially the southwestern U.S. To resolve this apparent conflict, SAHRA looks ahead to future stakeholder needs and builds its research agenda around selected critical stakeholder-relevant questions that require substantial and sustained investment in basic, multidisciplinary, enquiry-driven science. This paper describes SAHRA’s approach and reports on associated research and outreach activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BHS (2005a) available via http://ewre-www.cv.ic.ac.uk/bhs/exeter.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs B, Phillips F, Hogan J, Eastoe C, Hawley J, Granados A, Hutchison B (2003) Hydrogeologic and isotopic study of the groundwater resources of the Hueco Bolson aquifer, El Paso, Texas/Juarez, Mexico area. Hydrological Science and Technology 19(1–4):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultine KR, Scott RL, Cable WL, Williams DG (2004) Hydraulic redistribution by a dominant, warm desert phreatophyte: seasonal patterns and response to precipitation pulses. Functional Ecology 18:530–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAHS (2005a) Discussion documented at http://www.cig.ensmp.fr/~iahs/ via the PUB Corner and then IAHS Strategic Science Discussion links

    Google Scholar 

  • IAHS (2005b) Final draft of PUB Science Plan downloadable via http://www.cig.ensmp.fr/~iahs/

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch NP, Painter TH, Bales RC, Dozier J (2004) Incorporating remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model. Geophysical Research Letters 21:L03501–L03505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005a) see http://www.sahra.arizona.edu/

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005b) www.sahra.arizona.edu/newswatch/

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005c) www.sahra.swhydro.arizona.edu

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005d) www.sahra.arizona.edu/software/index_main.html

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005e) www.sahra.arizona.edu/kt/media

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005f) www.sahra.arizona.edu/kartchner/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005g) www.sahra.arizona.edu/water/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005h) www.sahra.arizona.edu/education/teachers/rio_grande.html

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHRA (2005i) www.sahra.arizona.edu/education/k-12/camp.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott RL, Huxman TE, Williams DG, Goodrich DC (2005) Ecohydrological impacts of woody plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2005) Evaluation of the 2003–2004 global call for HELP proposals (http://portal.unesco.org/sc_nat/ev.php?URL_ID=4324&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201 &reload=1107306140)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shuttleworth, W.J. (2006). Stakeholder-driven, enquiry-driven, or stakeholder-relevant, enquiry-driven science?. In: Craswell, E., Bonnell, M., Bossio, D., Demuth, S., Van De Giesen, N. (eds) Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5591-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics