Abstract
There is currently debate within the international hydrological community on whether hydrological science should give priority to providing measurements, knowledge, and understanding pre-determined as being needed by stakeholders, or priority to more basic enquiry-driven science that will stimulate the continued health and growth of hydrology as an important Earth science discipline. Two recent major international initiatives in hydrology reflect these two perspectives. One, the Hydrology for the Environment, Life, and Policy (HELP) program, is primarily fostered by UNESCO-IHP and is focused on stimulating the stakeholder-driven hydrological science required in specific catchments that have become members of a global network. The second, the decade on Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB), which is appropriately managed by IAHS, is primarily driven by scientific enquiry and is focused on creating new scientific methods and understanding, albeit with practical application ultimately in mind. This paper summarizes the nature, origins, growth, and progress of these two international programs but also describes the subtly different approach that has been adopted by the U.S. National Science Foundation’s (NSF’s) Center for Sustainability of semi-Arid Hydrology and Riparian Areas (SAHRA). NSF is a federal agency whose primary goal is to “enable the future” by stimulating novel science. Because SAHRA is a federally-funded entity supported by an agency with this goal, the Center clearly cannot operate in stakeholder-driven, response mode in competition with the already effective private U.S. consultancy industry. Nonetheless, SAHRA’s mission is to create knowledge and build understanding that will enhance the prospects of sustainable water management in semi-arid regions, especially the southwestern U.S. To resolve this apparent conflict, SAHRA looks ahead to future stakeholder needs and builds its research agenda around selected critical stakeholder-relevant questions that require substantial and sustained investment in basic, multidisciplinary, enquiry-driven science. This paper describes SAHRA’s approach and reports on associated research and outreach activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BHS (2005a) available via http://ewre-www.cv.ic.ac.uk/bhs/exeter.html
Hibbs B, Phillips F, Hogan J, Eastoe C, Hawley J, Granados A, Hutchison B (2003) Hydrogeologic and isotopic study of the groundwater resources of the Hueco Bolson aquifer, El Paso, Texas/Juarez, Mexico area. Hydrological Science and Technology 19(1–4):109–119
Hultine KR, Scott RL, Cable WL, Williams DG (2004) Hydraulic redistribution by a dominant, warm desert phreatophyte: seasonal patterns and response to precipitation pulses. Functional Ecology 18:530–538
IAHS (2005a) Discussion documented at http://www.cig.ensmp.fr/~iahs/ via the PUB Corner and then IAHS Strategic Science Discussion links
IAHS (2005b) Final draft of PUB Science Plan downloadable via http://www.cig.ensmp.fr/~iahs/
Molotch NP, Painter TH, Bales RC, Dozier J (2004) Incorporating remotely-sensed snow albedo into a spatially-distributed snowmelt model. Geophysical Research Letters 21:L03501–L03505
SAHRA (2005a) see http://www.sahra.arizona.edu/
SAHRA (2005b) www.sahra.arizona.edu/newswatch/
SAHRA (2005c) www.sahra.swhydro.arizona.edu
SAHRA (2005d) www.sahra.arizona.edu/software/index_main.html
SAHRA (2005e) www.sahra.arizona.edu/kt/media
SAHRA (2005f) www.sahra.arizona.edu/kartchner/index.html
SAHRA (2005g) www.sahra.arizona.edu/water/index.html
SAHRA (2005h) www.sahra.arizona.edu/education/teachers/rio_grande.html
SAHRA (2005i) www.sahra.arizona.edu/education/k-12/camp.html
Scott RL, Huxman TE, Williams DG, Goodrich DC (2005) Ecohydrological impacts of woody plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment
UNESCO (2005) Evaluation of the 2003–2004 global call for HELP proposals (http://portal.unesco.org/sc_nat/ev.php?URL_ID=4324&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201 &reload=1107306140)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shuttleworth, W.J. (2006). Stakeholder-driven, enquiry-driven, or stakeholder-relevant, enquiry-driven science?. In: Craswell, E., Bonnell, M., Bossio, D., Demuth, S., Van De Giesen, N. (eds) Integrated Assessment of Water Resources and Global Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5591-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5591-1_5
Received:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5590-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5591-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)