Abstract
The research literature clearly indicates that many student misconceptions in chemistry stem from an inability to visualize structures and processes at the molecular level. A selection of these misconceptions was targeted in the VisChem project by producing a suite of molecular-level animations. The animations were produced with care to balance the often-competing demands of scientific accuracy, technical constraints, and clarity of communication.
The effectiveness of a selection of these animations was evaluated when used in a conventional lecture context to assist students to build useful mental models of structures and processes at the molecular level. This research revealed that, if used appropriately, students perceived most of the intended ‘key features’ and incorporated them in their mental models. There was evidence that students could transfer their ideas to similar situations, but no evidence of transfer to new topics. This indicated that these key features were not ‘internalised’.
With this background we then embedded the animations as learning objects in learning activities, within a constructivist learning design. The VisChem Learning Design was developed to 1) motivate students to focus attention on the key features of their own prior mental model to explain test-tube level observations, 2) produce cognitive dissonance if their model fails, 3) actively look for new features in VisChem animations to reconcile any dissonance, and 4) then apply their refined model to new chemical topics.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersson, B. (1990a). Pupils conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12–16). In P. L. Lijnse, H. M. C. Eijkelhof, P. Licht, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomenon to microscopic particles (pp. 12–35). University of Utrecht.
Andersson, B. (1990b). Pupil’s conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12–16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53–85.
Atkins, P. (1999) Chemistry: the great ideas. Pure Applied Chemistry, 71(6), 927–929.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students’ visualisation of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, 24(4), 117–120.
Ben-Zvi, R., Silberstein, J., & Mamlok, R. (1990). Macro-micro relationships: a key to the world of chemistry. In P. L. Lijnse, H. M. C. Eijkelhof, P. Licht, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomenon to microscopic particles (pp. 183–197). University of Utrecht.
Bergquist, W. and Heikkinen, H. (1990). Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of chemical Education, 67(12), 1000–1003.
Bodner, G. M. (1991). I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 385–388.
Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B. E. (2006). Chemistry: The central science. 10th Ed. Pearson Education, Inc., NJ.
Burke, K. A., Greenbowe, T. J., & Windschitl, M. A. (1998). Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(12), 1658–1661.
Butts, B., & Smith, R. (1987). HSC Chemistry students’ understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds. Research in Science Education, 17, 192–201.
Dalton, R. M. (2003). The development of students’ mental models of chemical substances and processes at the molecular level. PhD Thesis, University of Western Sydney.
Dalton, R. M., & Tasker, R. F. (2006). Expert and novice interpretations of a Redox reaction: Comparison of participant narrations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Submitted for publication.
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548–553.
Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (2000). Improving introductory chemistry students’ ability to visualise the particulate basis of chemical reactions. Chemeda: Australian Journal of Chemical Education, 51, 52, 53, 45–56.
Gorodetsky, M., & Gussarsky, E. (1986). On the concept ‘Chemical Equilibrium’: The associative framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 197–204.
Greenbowe, T. J. (1994). An interactive multimedia software program for exploring electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(7), 555–557.
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628.
Haidar, A. H., & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919–938.
Hand B., Treagust D. F. (1997). Monitoring teacher’s referents for classroom practice using metaphors. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 183–192.
Harper, B., O’Donoghue, J., Oliver, R., & Lockyer, L., (2001). New designs for Web-based learning environments. In C. Montgomerie, & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2001, World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications(pp. 674–675), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Tampere, Finland.
Hill, D. (1988). Misleading Illustrations. Research in Science Education, 18, 290–297.
Hinton, M. E., & Nakhleh, M. B. (1999). Students’ microscopic, macroscopic, and symbolic representations of chemical reactions, The Chemical Educator, 4, 1–29.
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro and microchemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377–379.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 7, 701–703
Jones, L., Jordon, K., & Stillings, N. (2001). Molecular visualisation in science education. Report Prepared for the 2001 Gordon Research Conference on Science Education and Visualisation,Arlington.
Jones, L., & Tasker, R. (2002), CD, workbook, and web site. Bridging to the lab: media connecting chemistry concepts with practice. WH Freeman & Co., New York.See http://bcs.whfreeman.com/bridgingtothelab/ and view the free sample, last accessed on December 18, 2005.
Kleinman, R. W., Griffin, H. C., & Kerner, N. K. (1987). Images in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 766–770.
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949–968.
Kozma, R. B., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding, In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl. (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 41–60). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levy Nahum, T., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Bar-Dov, Z. (2004). Can final examinations amplify students’ misconceptions in chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 301–325.
Lijnse, P. L., Licht, P., Waarlo, A. J., & de Vos, W. (Eds.). (1990). Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. Proceedings of Conference at Utrecht centre for science and mathematics education. University of Utrecht, and references therein.*
Lowe, R. (2001). Beyond ‘Eye-candy’: Improving learning with animations. Paper Presented at the Apple University Consortium Conference, Townsville.
Milheim, W. D. (1993). How to use animation in computer assisted learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 171–178.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191–196.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 52–55.
Nakhleh, M. B., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). Conceptual learning vs. problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 190–192.
Niaz, M. (1995). Relationship between student performance on conceptual and computational problems of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 343–355.
Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187–196.
Nurrenbern, S. C., & Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 508–510.
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838.
Pereira, M. P., & Pestana, M. E. M. (1991). Pupils’ representations of models of water. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 313–319.
(0000)Russell, J. W., Kozma, R. B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N. & Davis, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronised macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 330–334.
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Students’ misconceptions in electrochemistry: Current flow in electrolyte solutions and the salt bridge. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(7), 819–823.
Sanger, M. J., Phelps, A. J., & Fienhold, J. (2000). Using a computer animation to improve students’ conceptual understanding of a can-crushing demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(11), 1517–1520.
Sequeira, M., & Leite, L. (1990). On relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles at the junior high school level. In P. L. Lijnse, H. M. C. Eijkelhof, P. Licht, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomenon to microscopic particles (pp. 220–232). University of Utrecht.
Sleet, R. J. (1993). Attitudes and images in chemistry. In C. Fogliani (ed.), Australian chemistry resource book(pp. 53–63). Charles Sturt University-Mitchell.
Taber, K. S. (1994). Misunderstanding the ionic bond. Education in Chemistry, 31, 100–102.
Taber, K. S. (1997). Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus electrostatic framework? School Science Review, 78(285), 85–95.
Tasker, R. (1992). Presenting a chemistry youth lecture. Chemistry in Australia, 59, 108–110.
Tasker, R., Bucat, R., Sleet, R., & Chia, W. (1996). The VisChem project: Visualising chemistry with multimedia. Chemistry in Australia, 63, 395–397; and Chemistry in New Zealand, 60, 42–45.
Tasker, R. (1999). CD for Chemistry: molecules, matter and change. In L. Jones & P. Atkins (4th ed.). New York: WH Freeman & Co.
Tasker, R. (2001). CD and Web Site for ChemCom — Chemistry in the community. An American Chemical Society Project. In H. Heikkinen (4th ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. See http://www.whfreeman.com/chemcom and go to ‘Interactive ChemCom Media for Instructors and Students’, Last accessed on December 18, 2005.
Tasker, R., Dalton, R., Sleet, R., Bucat, B., Chia, W., & Corrigan, D. (2002). VisChem: visualising chemical structures and reactions at the molecular level to develop a deep understanding of chemistry concepts, Last accessed on December 18, 2005, from the Learning Designs Web site: http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/exemplars/info/LD9/index.html.
Tasker, R., Bell, J., & Cooper, M. (2003). Web Site for General Chemistry - an American Chemical Society Project. In J. Bell (ed.), New York: WH Freeman & Co. See http://www.whfreeman.com/acsgenchemhome/, click on ‘Web Companion’, last accessed on December 18, 2005.
Tasker, R. (2004). Web Site for Chemical principles, the quest for insight. In P. Atkins & L. Jones (3rd ed.), New York: WH Freeman & Co. See http://www.whfreeman.com/chemicalprinciples/ and go to ‘Animations’, last accessed on December 18, 2005.
Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into practice: visualisation of the molecular world using animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 141–159.
Velazquez-Marcano, A., Williamson, V. M., Ashkenazi, G., Tasker, R. F., & Williamson, K. C. (2004). The use of video demonstrations and particulate animation in general chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 315–323.
Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521–534.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tasker, R., Dalton, R. (2008). Visualizing the Molecular World – Design, Evaluation, and Use of Animations. In: Gilbert, J.K., Reiner, M., Nakhleh, M. (eds) Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5266-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5267-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)