Abstract
We examined the effects of climate change on the future conservation and distribution patterns of the cloud forests in eastern Mexico, by using as a species model to Fagus grandifolia Ehr. var. mexicana (Martínez) Little which is mainly located in this vegetation type, at the Sierra Madre Oriental. This species was selected because it is restricted to the cloud forest, where it is a dominant element and has not been considered for protection in any national or international law. It is probably threatened due to the fact that it plays an important social role as a source of food and furnishing. We used a floristic database and a bioclimatic modeling approach including 19 climatic parameters, in order to obtain the current potential distribution pattern of the species. Currently, its potential distribution pattern shows that it is distributed in six different Mexican Priority Regions for Conservation. In addition, we also selected a future climate scenario, on the basis of some climate changes predictions already proposed. The scenario proposed is characterized by +2 °C and −20% rainfall in the region. Under this predicted climatic condition, we found a drastic distribution contraction of the species, in which most of the remaining populations will inhabit restricted areas located outside the boundaries of the surrounding reserves. Consequently, our results highlight the importance of considering the effects of possible future climate changes on the selection of conservation areas and the urgency to conserve some remaining patches of existing cloud forests. Accordingly, we believe that our bioclimatic modeling approach represents a useful tool to undertake decisions concerning the definition of protected areas, once the current potential distribution pattern of some selected species is known.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcantara O. and Luna V.I. 1997. Florística y análisis biogeográfico del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Tenango de Doria, Hidalgo, México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánica 68: 57–106.
Alcántara O. and Luna V.I. 2001. Análisis florístico de dos áreas con bosque mesófilo de montaña en el estado de Hidalgo, México: Eloxochitlán y Tlahuelompa. Acta Botánica Mexicana 54:51–87.
Anónimo 2000. Proyecto de Norma Oficial Mexicana PROY-NOM-059-ECOL-2000, protección ambiental-especies de flora y fauna silvestres de México-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio. Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. de octubre de 2000.
Arriaga L., Espinoza J.M., Aguilar C., Martínez E., Gómez L. and Loa E. (coordinadores) 2000. Regiones Terrestres Prioritarias de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México.
Booth T.H., Nix H.A. and Hutchinson M.F. 1987. Grid matching: a new method for homoclime analysis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 39: 241–255.
Briones O.L. 1991. Sobre la flora, vegetación y fitogeografía de la Sierra de San Carlos, Tamaulipas. Acta Botánica Mexicana 16: 15–44.
Canziani O.F. and Diaz S. 1998. Latin America. In: Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H. and Dokken D.J. (eds), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Special Report of IPCC Working Group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 187–230.
Cartujano S., Zamudio S., Alcantara O. and Luna I. 2002. El bosque mesófilo de montaña en el municipio de Landa de Matamoros, Querétaro, México. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 70: 13–44.
Churchill S.P., Griffin III D. and Lewis M. 1995. Moss diversity of the Tropical Andes. In: Churchill S.P., Balslev H., Forero E. and Luteyn J.L. (eds), Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forestes. Proceedings of the Neotropical Montane Forest Biodiversity and Conservation Symposium. The New York Botanical Garden, 21–26 June 1993, New York, pp. 335–348.
ESRI (Environmental Scientific Research Institute) 2000. ArcView 3.2. ESRI. Redlands, California, USA.
Giorgi F., Meehl G.A., Kattenberg A., Grassl H., Mitchell J.F.B., Stouffer R.J., Tokiioka T., Weaver A.J. and Wigley T.M.L. 1998. Simulated changes in vegetation distribution under global warning. In: Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H. and Dokken D.J. (eds), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Special report of IPCC working group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 427–437.
Houlder D.J., Hutchinson M.F., Nix H.A. and McMahon J.P. 2000. ANUCLIM 5.1 User Guide, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies. Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra.
Houghton J.T., Callander B.A. and Varney S.K. 1992. Climate change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Hutchinson M.F. 1991. The application of thin-plate smoothing splines to continent-wide data assimilation. In: Jasper J.D. (ed.), BMRC Research Report Series. Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 104–113.
Hutchinson M.F. 1995a. Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Syst. 9: 385–403.
Hutchinson M.F. 1995b. Stochastic space-time weather models from ground-based data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 73: 237–264.
Hutchinson M.F. 1997. ANUSPLIN. Version 4.1. User guide, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra.
Hutchinson M.F. and Gessler P.E. 1994. Splines — more than just a smooth interpolator. Geoderma 62: 45–67.
Johnston M.C., Nixon K., Nesom G.L., and Martínez M. 1989. Listado de plantas vasculares conocidas de la Sierra de Guatemala, Gómez Farías, Tamaulipas, México. Biotam 1:21–33.
Kappelle M., Van Vuuren M.M.I. and Baas P. 1999. Effects of climate change on biodiversity. A review and identification of key research issues. Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 1383–1397.
Karl T.A. 1998. Regional trends and variation of temperature and precipitation. In: Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H. and Dokken D.J. (eds), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Special Report of IPCC Working Group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 411–425.
Lindenmayer D.B., Nix H.A., McMahon J.P., Hutchinson M.F. and Tanton M.T. 1991. The conservation of Leadbeater’s possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri (McCoy): a case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling. J. Biogeogr. 18: 371–383.
Little E.L. Jr. 1965. Mexican beech, a variety of Fagus grandifolia. Castanea 30: 167–170.
López M.L. and Cházaro B.M. 1995. Plantas leñosas raras del bosque mesófilo de montaña. I. Fagus mexicana Martínez (Fagaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 57:113–115.
Luna V.I., Almeida L., Villers L. and Lorenzo L. 1988. Reconocimiento florístico y consideraciones fitogeográficas del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Teocelo, Veracruz. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 48: 35–63.
Luna V.I., Alcántara A.O., Espinosa O.D.E. and Morrone J.J. 1999. Historical relationships of the Mexican cloud forests: a preliminary vicariance model applying Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity to vascular plant taxa. J. Biogeogr. 26: 1299–1306.
Luna V.I., Alcántara A.O., Morrone J.J. and Espinosa O.D.E. 2000. Track analysis and conservation priorities in the cloud forests of Hidalgo, Mexico. Div. Distribut. 6: 137–143.
Luna V.I., Morrone J.J., Ayala A.O. and Organista D.E. 2001. Biogeographical affinities among Neotropical cloud forests. Plant Systemat. Evol. 228: 229–239.
Malda G.B. 1990. Plantas vasculares raras, amenazadas y en peligro de extinción en Tamaulipas. Biotam 2: 55–61.
McNeely J.A., Gadgil M., Leveque C., Padoch C. and Reedford K. 1995. Human influences on Biodiversity. In: Heywood V.H. and Warton R.T. (eds), Global Diversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK pp. 711–821.
Moguel P. and Toledo M.V.M. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 13(1): 11–21.
Morrone J.J. and Crisci J.V. 1995. Historical biogeography: introduction to methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 26: 373–401.
Morrone J.J. and Espinosa M.D. 1998. La relevancia de los atlas biogeográficos para la conservación de la biodiversidad mexicana. Ciencia (México) 49: 12–16.
Nix H.A. 1986. A Biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In: Longmore R. (ed.), Atlas of the Elapid snakes of Australia. Flora and Fauna. 7: 4–15.
Neilson R.P. 1998. Simulation of regional climate change with global coupled climate models and regional modelling techniques. In: Watson R.T., Zinyowera M.C., Moss R.H. and Dokken D.J. (eds), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Special Report of IPCC Working Group II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 439–456.
Oldfield S.F., Lusty C. and MacKinven A. 1998. The World List of Threatened Trees. World Conservation Press.
Pearson R.G. and Dawson T.P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361–371.
Pérez P.M. 1994. Revisión sobre el conocimiento dendrológico, silvícola y un censo de las poblaciones actuales del género Fagus en México. Tesis de maestría (Biología). Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, DF, 146 pp.
Pérez P.M. 1999. Las hayas de México.Monografía de Fagus grandifolia spp. mexicana. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, México, 51 pp.
Peterson A.T. and Vieglais D.A. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51: 363–371.
Rzedowski J. 1996. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México. Acta Botánica mexicana 35: 25–44.
Pérez P.M. 1999. Las hayas de México.Monografísa de Fagus grandifolia spp. mexicana. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, México, 51 pp.
Shen C.F. 1992. A monography of the genus Fagus Tourn. ex. L. (Fagaceae). Dissertation, City University of New York, New York.
Téllez V.O. and Dávila A.P. 2003. Protected areas and climate change: a case study of the cacti in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán biosphere reserve, México. Conserv. Biol. 17(3): 846–853.
Vovides A.P., Luna V. and Medina G. 1997. Relación de algunas plantas y hongos mexicanos raros, amenazados o en peligro de extinción y sugerencias para su conservación. Acta Botánica Mexicana 39: 1–42.
Webster G.L. 1995. The Panorama of Neotropical Cloud Forests. In: Churchill S.P., Balslev H., Forero E. and Luteyn J.L. (eds), Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Forestes. Proceedings of the Neotropical Montane Forest Biodiversity and Conservation Symposium. The New York Botanical Garden, 21–26 June 1993, New York, pp. 53–77.
Williams L.G., Rowden A. and Newton A.C. 2003. Distribution and stand characteristics of relict populations of Mexican beech (Fagus grandifolia var mexicana). Biol. Conserv. 109: 27–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Téllez-Valdés, O., Dávila-Aranda, P., Lira-Saade, R. (2006). The effects of climate change on the long-term conservation of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana, an important species of the Cloud Forest in Eastern Mexico. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Forest Diversity and Management. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_3
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5207-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5208-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)