Skip to main content
  • 570 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this book is threefold. Firstly, I examine the methodologies that other researchers use to study college-level classes for enhanced learning using technology and collaborative strategies. Secondly, I share my learning from an action research study I conducted in my undergraduate-level General Biochemistry I class. The impetus for this study was my goal of becoming a better teacher. Thirdly, I put forth ideas for other college faculty, who are grappling with improving the learning environment in their science classrooms, and who may identify with my experiences and learn from my action research study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When first confronting the word epistemology, I had to keep going back to read the definition from Guba and Lincoln (1989, p. 83): “Epistemology is that branch of philosophy that deals with the origin, nature, and limits of human knowledge.”

  2. 2.

    John B. Thompson, the editor of a collection of chapters by Bourdieu (1991), defines habitus is a “set of dispositions which incline agents to act and react in certain ways. The dispositions generate practices, perceptions and attitudes which are ‘regular’ without being consciously coordinated or governed by any ‘rule’” (p. 12).

  3. 3.

    Swidler (1986) defines strategies of action as “persistent ways of ordering action through time” (p. 273).

References

  • Adamson SL, Banks D, Burtch M, Cox F III, Judson E, Turley JB et al (2003) Reformed undergraduate instruction and its subsequent impact on secondary school teaching practice and student achievement. J Res Sci Teach 40(10):939-957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1991) Language and symbolic power (ed: Thompson JB). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzman DP (1991) Practice makes practice: a critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee KA (1993) Collaborative learning: higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) (1994) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Djerassi C (2000, February) Contraception vs. conception - a millennial prognosis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Druger M (2002) Teaching the introductory college science course: a career specialty. J Coll Sci Teach 32:148-149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis C (1997) Evocative autoethnography: writing emotionally about our lives. In: Tierney WG, Lincoln YS (eds) Representation and the text: re-framing the narrative voice. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp 115-139

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen MM, Gergen NK (2000) Qualitative inquiry: tensions and transformations. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 1025-1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer PJ (2002) Opalescence at the triple point: teaching, research, and service. In: Taylor PC, Gilmer PJ, Tobin K (eds) Transforming undergraduate science education: social constructivist perspectives. Peter Lang, New York, pp 423-462

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer PJ (2004) Transforming university biochemistry teaching through action research: utilizing collaborative learning and teaching. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld E von (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80:121-140. [reprinted in 1998, In Matthews MR (ed) Constructivism in science education: a philosophical examination. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp. 11-30]

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfeld M, James D (1998) Bourdieu and education: acts of practical theory. Falmer, Bristol, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Janesick VJ (2000) The choreography of qualitative research design: minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 379-400

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather P (1986) Research as praxis. Harv Educ Rev 56(3):257-277

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard WH (2000) How do college students best learn science? An assessment of popular teaching styles and their effectiveness. J Coll Sci Teach 29(6):385-388

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi P (1984) The periodic table. Schocken Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Denzin NK (2000) The seventh moment: out of the past. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 1047-1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG (2000) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 163-188

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson S (2002) What it means to achieve: negotiating assessment in a biology course. In: Taylor PC, Gilmer PJ, Tobin K (eds) Transforming undergraduate science teaching: social constructivist perspectives. Peter Lang, New York, pp 245-274

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobel Prize (1980) The Nobel Prize Internet archive (Chemistry). http://www.nobelprizes.com/nobel/nobel.html. Accessed 31 Aug 2003

  • Paul R, Elder L (2007) Miniature guide to critical thinking: concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking, Dillon Beach, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L (1994) Writing: a method of inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 516-529

    Google Scholar 

  • Sienko MJ, Plane RA (1961) Chemistry, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am Sociol Rev 51:273-286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias S (1990) They’re not dumb, they’re different: stalking the second tier. Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright EL, Sunal DW, Day JB (2004) Improving undergraduate science teaching through educational research. In: Sunal DW, Wright EL, Day JB (eds) Reform in undergraduate science teaching for the 21st century. Information Age, Greenwich, CT, pp 1-11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilmer, P.J. (2009). Introducing the Study. In: Transforming University Biochemistry Teaching Using Collaborative Learning and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4981-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics